The objection is logical in nature Dank. Sure, scripture informs some of it (God being a perfect being for example) but the problem of evil has more to do with logical coherence.
If for example, we operate with your definition of God being flawed (rather than a perfect being), how can God be the source of morality? It is reasonable to suppose that whether we should morally do A or believe B because what ultimately grounds said obligations is flawed. Arguably, the consequences for ethics would be disastrous. But I dont think that would be acceptable for religious folk. So, we modify some of the o.g premises to fix that incoherence and round and round we go.