Jump to content

[PGT] Canucks @ Avalanche Nov 22 2023


Satchmo

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, stawns said:

 

if they can add a top 4 d, without giving up a first or any significant prospect, great.  If not, I'd prefer they wait until the off season and find a better value deal or look to UFA.

 

37 minutes ago, NewbieCanuckFan said:

Can't really see that possible (getting one without giving up alot).  We only got Hronek with assets from Horvat deal as a bargaining chip (no he's not great Horvat but he was in the midst of a career type year - selling high)

Agreed, you can't get a top four defenseman without giving up something significant. If the Canucks ended up with another player like Hronek, where will they finish in the standings? If it is top five in the league, that would mean it's a late first round pick which is even later than the pick that we used from the Horvat trade to send it to detroit.

 

I guess the question is, how long is our contending window and do we have enough prospects currently to add into the mix during that window? 

 

Secondly, how long will it take a late first to be NHL ready? Is it better to trade that pick for immediate help with a guy like Hronek? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Gawdzukes said:

 

Tocchet was not as skilled as Petterson but he was still a very skilled hockey player. Not just all toughness as his 952 points in 1144 games indicates.

 

 

It may have been over officiated, especially that second where the flow got taken out of the game. Those games are hard to call though when everyone is flying around at 100 mph and being feisty on every play. Sometimes the players themselves just refuse to settle down. We really played a good tight checking playoff style, and Colorado reciprocated. Pretty good game even though we didn't get the result. Hopefully we carry this play forward to next game.

Tochett was an awesome player.   Very skilled.   It wasn't an easy era to play in either.    100% believe that the guys back then were in much better shape then the guys on our current team last season, and that he should have called them out.   Which he did.   Even late in his career, he ventilated Martin Broduer, with ALL his d-men helping.   Not just a tough guy that's for certain.

 

Edit:   Personally love Tochett.   And glad he's our coach.   I've lived through it.   Don't know why you have to ask a 20 year old to keep up to a 40-50 year old.   But it's a generational thing.    Kept having to rely on older guys to do jobs that we'd do at 20, to help the guys who were 40-50 back then.    What that generation could have done without a redline and the sticks these days. 

Edited by IBatch
  • Cheers 2
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Report card from Athletics

 

 

Canucks report cards 2023-24: Grading every Vancouver forward through 20 games

 

The Vancouver Canucks pushed in Denver on Wednesday night but struggled to generate Grade-A scoring chances in the third period against a stout Colorado Avalanche side that bested them.

 

The 5-2 loss was Vancouver’s third regulation defeat in the club’s past four games, the sort of flat stretch that’s been few and far between for one of the NHL’s best stories in the first quarter of the campaign.

 

For most of this season so far, all the Canucks have done is win. Now that we’re just about 25 percent into the season, The Athletic’s Vancouver bureau figured it’d use the next two days to assess precisely where this club stands, and grade the contributions of every Vancouver regular to this point in the campaign. We’ll start with the forwards today and then grade all of the defensemen and goaltenders on Friday.

 

Note: Grades are handed out relative to a player’s expectations. If Player X has a better grade than Player Y it doesn’t mean X has been more valuable than Y.

 

Elias Pettersson: A

2023-24 statistics: 20 GP, 8-20-28

 

Despite playing through an undisclosed ailment during the first quarter of the campaign, Pettersson remains the straw that stirs the drink for the Canucks up front.

 

Now saying that might be a bit controversial today than it would’ve been at any other point this season, given that Pettersson is coming off one of his most pedestrian performances of the year in Denver. Through the first 20 games of the campaign, however, Pettersson has been arguably the club’s most effective penalty-killing forward, remains the Canucks player with the most gravity on the man advantage, has drawn penalties at a dizzying rate and has driven play — albeit somewhat less effectively than he historically has, perhaps due to injury — at five-on-five.

 

By both Net Rating and Evolving Hockey’s Goals Above Replacement model, Pettersson has been Vancouver’s most valuable forward this season — and one of the most valuable players in the league:

 

 

 

Any way you slice it, as Pettersson goes, so go the Canucks. He is, simply put, one of the single most effective and complete centremen in hockey.

 

Ilya Mikheyev: B+

2023-24 statistics: 16 GP, 6-4-10

 

When a player comes back after an injury as severe as Mikheyev’s ACL tear, it can often take a while to shake off the rust. We haven’t seen the same type of explosive foot speed Mikheyev showed in Toronto, and the coaching staff has been careful to limit his penalty-killing minutes, but his return has otherwise been stronger than expected.

 

Since drawing back into the lineup, Mikheyev is tied with Quinn Hughes for the team lead with six five-on-five goals. He also leads the club in five-on-five shots and high-danger chances in that span. That’s pretty impressive considering his linemates Pettersson and Kuzmenko have slowed down at even strength lately.

 

Mikheyev looks confident and assertive with the puck, while even sprinkling in the type of unexpected deke or maneuver to create space that we’ve rarely seen from him previously. His line needs to start generating better five-on-five results but it’s not Mikheyev’s responsibility to be the primary driver of a top-six line. He’s a complementary piece on that line — it’s on his linemates to step up.

 

Individually, he’s performed about as well as you could have hoped given how long of a layoff he had. As he puts the injury further behind, hopefully he can regain the exhilarating explosiveness that can make him even more effective on the forecheck.

 

Andrei Kuzmenko: C+

2023-24 statistics: 19 GP, 3-11-14

 

Kuzmenko remains an absolute game breaker, but it’s been too quiet around him too often this season.

 

The obvious regression — and Kuzmenko converted shots at a 27 percent clip, a historic rate in his first NHL campaign, which was never going to last — has hit. In fact, it’s gone overboard.

 

Kuzmenko is shooting 10 percent through his first 19 games (down from 27 percent) with an individual point percentage in the mid-40s, which is down from 70 percent last season (individual point percentage is a measurement of how many goals scored when a player is on the ice they’ve credited with a point on).

 

Given Kuzmenko’s finishing skill at the net front and his knack for getting his stick on pucks in the blue paint, we’d expect him to convert at a clip north of league average going forward. Given his absurd ability to feather passes through traffic and find open teammates in soft areas of coverage, we’d expect him to be involved on more of the goals scored when he’s on the ice when the sample expands.

 

Despite there being some noise deflating his individual counting stats, Kuzmenko’s two-way contributions have been a bit uneven this season as well. He’s currently playing fourth-line minutes at five-on-five and ranks 10th among Vancouver forwards who have dressed in at least 10 games by even-strength ice time per game, and it’s clear he’s still working on earning Rick Tocchet’s trust.

 

Overall, Kuzmenko hasn’t played poorly and he’s still making a handful of plays that are unique and show off his superb skill level, but given his role — on Pettersson’s wing at evens, and on the Canucks’ vaunted first-unit power play — it’s probably fair to note he hasn’t made a full meal of his opportunities through the first quarter of the campaign.

 

J.T. Miller: A

2023-24 statistics: 20 GP, 13-17-30

 

Miller has looked like a man on a mission this year. Miller’s 30 points in 20 games have him sitting second in NHL scoring behind only Hughes and his 13 goals are one back of Kyle Connor and Auston Matthews for the league lead. He’s a massive cog for Vancouver’s elite power play because of his dual-threat playmaking and finishing skills, registering the most primary points on the man advantage among the club’s PP1 group.

 

The rave reviews of Miller’s game have a lot more to do with just offense, however.

 

After oft-criticized defensive play last year, Miller’s two-way form looks considerably sharper. He’s held up in a shutdown role against opposing top lines, which would have seemed far-fetched a year ago. There are still nights where his line gets caved — the Canucks are getting outshot and outchanced with Miller on the ice this year — but he’s been sturdy and up to the task on most nights. There’s been a significant improvement in his commitment on the backcheck and at cutting down the egregious giveaways that tainted his reputation last year.

 

Miller has been a monster and his line’s effectiveness in handling the hardest minutes on the team is a major catalyst behind the Canucks’ hot start.

 

Brock Boeser: A-

2023-24 statistics: 20 GP, 13-9-22

 

Boeser is leading all Canucks forwards in five-on-five ice time per game this season and has scored more goals than every single player in the NHL outside of Kyle Conner and Auston Matthews. That’s a dream start for Boeser, who has endured several uneven, rumour-filled campaigns in Vancouver over the past few years.

 

Although Boeser’s two-way results by the underlying numbers this season have been a bit soft, he’s battling extremely difficult matchups on Miller’s wing and the enhanced maturity and well-roundedness of his overall game has been apparent. The goal totals get the headlines, as they should, but Boeser’s work on the wall, his playmaking and his overall positional intelligence have been key in the Miller line’s success at five-on-five.

 

It should also be noted that Boeser has eight power-play points, and has been the screener on a large handful of other Vancouver goals scored with the man advantage. Boeser has perhaps been the quickest study and the player most positively impacted by the early success of Vancouver’s movement power-play scheme.

 

Phil Di Giuseppe: B

2023-24 statistics: 20 GP, 3-5-8

 

In an ideal situation, Di Giuseppe would be a bottom-six player. There’s a deficit in both his finishing touch and overall ability to drive offence that makes him a less-than-perfect fit for a complementary top-six role.

 

But in the grand scheme of things, it’s extremely impressive that an AHL/NHL tweener has capably held down a top-six matchup role for a quarter of a season. Eight points in 20 games doesn’t seem that impressive, but it’s solid considering he doesn’t get any power-play time.

 

The question now is how much longer he can last in this high-profile role.

 

Di Giuseppe is excellent as the first man in on the forecheck. Early in the season, his work as the F1 was helping Miller’s line control a lot of heavy cycling shifts in the offensive zone. The Canucks’ blue line hasn’t been quite as fast transitioning the puck on exits in recent games though, which is creating fewer opportunities for Di Giuseppe to create havoc on the forecheck. Without a conducive environment to leverage his puck retrieval skills, Di Giuseppe has been fairly quiet and his underlying two-way numbers have slipped. During the last couple of games, we’ve even seen Rick Tocchet give Anthony Beauvillier some shifts on the Miller line in Di Giuseppe’s place.

 

Dakota Joshua: B-

2023-24 statistics: 19 GP, 2-3-5

 

It hasn’t been the smoothest ride, but on balance, Joshua has been excellent as a mainstay on Vancouver’s third line.

 

The hardworking, physical forward is indispensable to Vancouver’s forward group given his unique combination of size and speed relative to his teammates. That has kept him in the lineup despite some pointed commentary from Tocchet about his fitness level during training camp, and his consistency during the season.

 

For the most part, though, Joshua has taken any pointed criticism of his game in stride and continually improved. Over the past month or so, Joshua and his linemates have provided Vancouver with significant stability on the third line. And although he’s not one of the club’s most frequently used penalty killers, Joshua’s impact in short-handed situations has been exceptional. It might even be an area where the club should strongly consider using him more frequently.

 

Conor Garland: B-

2023-24 statistics: 20 GP, 2-3-5

 

Let’s get the obvious out of the way: Two goals and five points aren’t enough for a $4.95 million forward. There has to be much more bottom-line production moving forward.

 

Garland’s overall impact far exceeds what the disappointing point totals give him credit for, though.

 

Garland has been the play-driving engine for the vastly improved bottom six. The Canucks are throttling teams to the tune of a 60 percent control of shot attempts and outscoring them 8-4 during his five-on-five shifts this season. That underlying profile is the best of any Canucks player.

 

Vancouver’s feisty undersized winger is setting up a ton of chances but what can a playmaker do when his linemates can’t bury their chances? Clever passes into the slot that would normally turn into assists are instead missed scoring chances by Teddy Blueger and Joshua. Garland needs to do a better job of capitalizing on his own chances too, but he’s a distributor first and foremost, which means he’s at the mercy of his linemates’ finishing to rack up points.

 

The way Garland’s hounding pucks, winning battles, drawing penalties and pushing the pace is essential for the third line’s current success. He’s one of the few forwards on this team who can legitimately drive even-strength offence and he barely gets scored on defensively, too. He’s a really important piece for this team, even if the point totals don’t reflect that yet.

 

Pius Suter: B

2023-24 statistics: 15 GP, 4-0-4

 

Suter’s recent injury absence has been sorely felt, particularly given the way the club’s third-line was beginning to cook prior to his injury.

 

Although the counting stats have been pedestrian, Suter’s overall two-way intelligence, high motor and honest work rate have made him a helpful supporting contributor to Vancouver’s red-hot start. He’s just played clean, subtly effective hockey over 200 feet on a consistent basis when he’s been in the lineup.

 

Teddy Blueger: B-

2023-24 statistics: 6 GP, 0-1-1

 

Blueger doesn’t have the offensive chops to hold down a top-nine role. Blueger’s profile has long indicated he’s best served as a fourth-line centre though, so he doesn’t deserve criticism for being unable to bury some of the glorious looks the third line is generating.

 

The veteran defensive centre has added value by winning 54.1 percent of his draws and displaying smart positioning and puck support in all three zones. He hasn’t hindered the third line’s ability to control play by any means and has only been tagged for one five-on-five goal against through six contests. That’s good stuff considering how far a player like Blueger can end up behind the eight ball when they miss a solid chunk of games due to injury.

 

Blueger’s calling card is his penalty-killing ability. It appears that Tocchet is mindful of Blueger’s heavier even-strength workload and is trying not to put too much on his plate until he’s farther removed from that injury because he’s played just 4:19 short-handed through his six games.

 

Nils Höglander: B+

2023-24 statistics: 18 GP, 6-3-9

 

The Canucks need to find more opportunity to get Höglander involved.

 

The waterbug fourth-liner, whom Pettersson has often referred to as a “pint-sized power forward,” has been one of Vancouver’s standouts whenever he’s been in the lineup. While playing a fourth-line role and occasionally finding himself in the press box as a healthy scratch in the early going, Höglander has nonetheless found ways to generate offence and scoring chances on a far more consistent basis than the majority of his teammates.

 

A historic PDO bender has hidden how much difficulty this Canucks team is having generating really high-quality scoring chances at even strength in the first quarter of the season. As the shooting percentage evens out, the Canucks are going to need to generate more if they’re going to continue winning games at the sort of clip they have to this point. The game in Colorado was a fine example — they simply didn’t test Alexander Georgiev frequently enough when down a goal in the third period.

 

Höglander may still have a few warts in terms of his overall defensive IQ, but his work rate is standout, and if this club isn’t generating enough quality scoring chances — and they’re not, at the moment — increasing Höglander’s ice time and the quality of his linemates is one of the most straightforward internal solutions at the club’s disposal.

 

Sam Lafferty: B

2023-24 statistics: 20 GP, 4-5-9

 

Lafferty’s speed, size and grit have added a unique dimension to the Canucks’ bottom six. He’s combined those tools with an unimpeachable work rate to put pressure on opposing defenders, whether that’s on the forecheck or even rush chances where he attacks the net hard. The Canucks have gained enormously from the four goals and nine points he’s chipped in with as well.

 

Lafferty’s underlying numbers are a bit soft but it’s worth remembering he’s played a lot of games at centre, whereas last season, he was mostly lining up on the wing.

 

Jack Studnicka: C+

2023-24 statistics: 5 GP, 1-0-0

 

Studnicka forced his way into the Vancouver lineup with a stupendous run at training camp, and looked solid and physically assertive while playing both at centre and on the wing in his five appearances this season. Studnicka will surely be back as injuries hit later on in the season and looks the part of a solid depth contributor.

 

Anthony Beauvillier: C-

2023-24 statistics: 20 GP, 2-6-8

 

Vancouver’s glut of wingers meant somebody would suffer in terms of opportunity. Beauvillier’s been the odd man out, spending most of the year in a fourth-line role. The 13:30 he’s averaging this season is a far cry from the 16:59 he averaged in 33 games with Vancouver down the stretch.

 

That reduced usage is justified because he’s been invisible offensively for the most part. Beauvillier’s only two goals were the ninth and 10th tallies in the Canucks’ 10-1 blowout of the Sharks. He has been a lot more noticeable and dangerous during the last 2-3 games and has earned shifts higher up the lineup, but he still can’t buy a bounce right now. Beauvillier has been a streaky player so hopefully the floodgates will open for a hot stretch once one finally goes in.

 

Beauvillier is reliable defensively (he rarely makes mistakes and is dilligent on the backcheck) and has positive play-driving numbers, but he needs to provide more value considering his $4.15 million cap hit.

 

(Photo of Andrei Kuzmenko celebrating with Elias Pettersson and Brock Boeser: Stan Szeto / USA Today)

 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, stawns said:

 

and I was absolutely fine with using that extra pick to get him, but I don't want to see that this year and giving up their only 1st.  They're not at that stage yet, imo

 

33 minutes ago, IBatch said:

Giving up a first for a rental no.   But a cost controlled RFA, it's worth looking into.    We still should have cash for a UFA (if we are lucky enough to get one, it's  definitely not a game of paying a little more, those guys get to choose where they want to go, and 53 versus 36.6-low 40% for a lot of teams is a big disadvantage if we pay the full premium).    A trade and sign might be ok too.  As a rental who's traded to us and signed.    And our firsts are no longer blue chip firsts.   Or at least shouldn't be, even with .500 plus some loser points,  likely around 15-16th.   Don't want to waste them on rentals either though.    Need to make the playoffs for awhile be doing that.   Gillis did it once.   That's it. 

 

Yes I'm thinking a first for a cost controlled top 4 D man a la Hronek. I think that's hundred percent worth it. Definitely not for a rental

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, IBatch said:

You bet.  Don't forget Raty either, he's still developing though.   Can see their plan kind of.   And think they've done a good job so far, both in their signings and their trades.    Buying out OEL was a statement as well.    A statement that they want to try a win now and compete now.   Just needs the follow  through.     Teams still got a lot of options next year.    Think EP is playing hurt.     If the team could pull off a trade to help the D, that would be the first thing.    The center position is a luxury item for sure.   What would Suter look like in the top six?  Or Bluegar?   Hopefully we won't need to find out. 

 Forget which game it was on the opening trip but Myers was having a brutal game and put a shot off EPs leg and he hasn’t looked the same since. 
He looks like he is struggling with his push and foot speed which makes me think it is ankle/high ankle or possibly knee. Pace is way down in his game. 
He will come round. World of faith in that guy. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, IBatch said:

What that generation could have done without a redline and the sticks these days. 

Geoff Courtnall would've scored a ton more goals heh.  Yeah he tended to float near that line waiting for a pass but he had a certain chippyness/rough edge to his game unlike his smooth skating brother.

Edited by NewbieCanuckFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Smashian Kassian said:

 

I think last night you kinda have to tip your cap to Colorado, it's easy to say they should hold onto pucks but hard to do when the other team is so fast & aggressive. They don't make it easy.

 

In some games theyve been able to hold onto the puck more, other games they haven't, and that's what playoff hockey is like. Sometimes it's a game of battles. The Twins themselves did alot of chipping the puck in to areas & being strong to win it back. 

 

Obviously you want to have possession but maybe they aren't fast enough to be a dominant possession team against everyone quite yet. They probably still need to adjust personnel in the forward group.

 

Also hurts when most of your defense aren't great at moving the puck (bottom 4 aside from Cole).

 

Our depleted dcore certainly is a large factor. Last night was a clear indication of the uphill battle this team will have against good teams who can move the puck, if we aren't able to shore up the backend via trade or a return to health. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tusk said:

to be fair to Myers, Juleson and Friedman, Cole looked like the one out of position for 2 goals against last night. Like he was trying too hard. Its hard to play systems when emotions are in the mix, playing a former team.

Cole also caused the Myers penalty to completely kill Manson's major with the bad pass back to Myers while in the Avs end.

 

Glad he's on the team... just had a rough game. 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Kragar said:

Cole also caused the Myers penalty to completely kill Manson's major with the bad pass back to Myers while in the Avs end.

 

Glad he's on the team... just had a rough game. 

He was trying to play "too big" to account for the Avs size. In watching him this year, he is better playing a disrupter role with a few big hits mixed in. Last night...he tried too hard to be physical, often taking himself out of the position to make a play with his stick..just my observation.

 

This was Myers game to shine; his size was a HUGE attribute yesterday. Ditto if Soucy would have played.

.

Edited by BC_Hawk
  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I thought the Canucks played a good game and showed they can hang with the big dogs. Our top players showed they can match up against any teams top players and there were certainly points where we were the dominant team. However, Colorado capitalized on our mistakes.

 

They mostly neutralized Pettersson but we mostly neutralized MacKinnon. Miller and Boeser both had very solid games, and Quinn (especially once he changed his skate blades) had a great game. Ultimately our lack of defensive depth became quite evident, especially when up against Colorado's deep defense corps.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, DrJockitch said:

 Forget which game it was on the opening trip but Myers was having a brutal game and put a shot off EPs leg and he hasn’t looked the same since. 
He looks like he is struggling with his push and foot speed which makes me think it is ankle/high ankle or possibly knee. Pace is way down in his game. 
He will come round. World of faith in that guy. 

That was a hard Myers shot and I hope Myers keeps doing it. I bet Petty jumps next time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, IBatch said:

Well if anyone's interested, i'd give the team solid B+, A- what's the difference. 

I think it depends how you break it down. 
I mean for what this team is and what they have they have done remarkably. Coaching gets an A+ there.
The D was changed dramatically but is still very thin.  Great work by PA but given cap restraints, remarkable what he has done, yet we are still a top 4 RD short. 
Forwards have stepped up. EP playing through something and still near league lead, his D/possession game has suffered though, JTM has been remarkably good on both sides. Still way too small upfront but good depth of scoring when healthy. 
No way for PA to fix everything in the time he has had. The pairing of Benning and Aqua left too many messes. 
‘But with what this team has to be where they are a quarter of the way into the season is A all the way. 
‘Do I quibble about what I see as some missed opportunities sure but this team is way ahead of where they reasonably should be given what the last couple of years have looked like. 

Edited by DrJockitch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, aGENT said:

 

Who suggested Miller wasn't a good player?

 

come on agent, you should know by now, there's only one way to skin a cat.  If you advocated for miller being moved, then you must absolutely hate him and think he's trash........and cheer for the Canucks to lose every game

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, BC_Hawk said:

He was trying to play "too big" to account for the Avs size. In watching him this year, he is better playing a disrupter role with a few big hits mixed in. Last night...he tried too hard to be physical, often taking himself out of the position to make a play with his stick..just my observation.

 

This was Myers game to shine; his size was a HUGE attribute yesterday. Ditto if Soucy would have played.

.

I think Wolanin and Woo would have completely changed the game instead of Friedman and Juul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, wai_lai416 said:

lol coming in here watching the EP bashing just shows how toxic this fan base is.. you want to know why EP line is struggling 5v5? coz the 2 defenceman he plays with majority of the time 5v5 creates 0 space can't push tempo can't get the puck up to the forwards..

 

JT miller spent 160 mins with QH and Hronek compared to EP only spending 80mins with QH and Hronek.. easy to do well 5v5 when your defenceman is creating so much space for you on offence. guess what.. Miller's line looks terrible 5v5 offensively whenever they are not playing with QH and Hronek either which is rare... EP can dominate with inferior defenceman when the other teams are bad which is majority of the teams we played this year.. and when the tougher team shows up.. he can't do it by himself without the 2 defenceman.. it's literally playing 3v5 right now

100% this. I've pointed it out a few times but falls on deaf ears. That said, Pettersson can't or won't shoot the puck right now. He's just not a threat and teams key in on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Goal_thecup said:

Makar was actually crying/whining on the bench; guy is a talent; but a whiney female dog.

Absolutely embarrassing... it was blatant pens, every single one of them.

Cross check Boeser in the face and complain he goes down... Big man Manson, cross checking lady bing in the face... Really want us to sign a boy that can take them on...

 

To see Makar battling Petey behind the goal also really wanted me to see one of the other guys run him over... big time.

  • Cheers 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...