Jump to content

[Mafia] EPL 2023/24 - MAFIA WIN


KZA

Recommended Posts

If you guys don't want to vote NIK I suggest SS. As I said I strongly believe one of them is mafia but not both. Of course that runs the risk of us choosing the wrong one and then being in LYLO, but I don't really see a "safe" lynch here. Maybe Qwags since his no-showing followed by a late vote is always scummy in a vacuum, but it's Qwags

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the thing about aladeen is that he'll throw mud at the wall and hope some of it sticks when he's wolfing, which i feel like he's doing to me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Time Lord said:

If you guys don't want to vote NIK I suggest SS. As I said I strongly believe one of them is mafia but not both. Of course that runs the risk of us choosing the wrong one and then being in LYLO, but I don't really see a "safe" lynch here. Maybe Qwags since his no-showing followed by a late vote is always scummy in a vacuum, but it's Qwags

Deep Purple - Smoke on the Water

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 112 said:

aladeen and sharpshooter are sus. i haven't quoted ss's posts last night but i felt irked by a lot of them. i think his train of thought didn't align with what a town's mindset should be,

 

SV is playing diplomat, but that's not alignment-indicative for him. i think he's been reasonable in his approach to the last couple of rounds at least. although i disagree with him that it should be a qwags/bj wagons this round i don't think he's been expressly wolfy.

so who should the wagons be?

 

@112

@Blue Jay 22

@Time Lord

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Time Lord said:

If you guys don't want to vote NIK I suggest SS. As I said I strongly believe one of them is mafia but not both. Of course that runs the risk of us choosing the wrong one and then being in LYLO, but I don't really see a "safe" lynch here. Maybe Qwags since his no-showing followed by a late vote is always scummy in a vacuum, but it's Qwags

why not beeps... hes been pretty steady on the bj train

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Blue Jay 22 said:

Oh that’s what/who beeps stands for. I thought lucky was just going “beep beep” in my head and that’s why I elephanted him

luckylager = roadrunner??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking that Aladeen might have been soft-claiming Naslund as scum, based on his opening two rounds of votes, but then I see no reason for him to abandon that pursuit this round.

Idk..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think if the day 2 wagons were v/v then qwags just voted to appear as though he was protecting town.

 

if they were v/w then he was protecting a teammate.

 

if we're doing qwags/bj then it's qwags who has to go

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dallsbeep said:

I'm just not sure how good an idea it is to base a scumread off a potential redcheck that Porscha had.

 

I think in most cases a sheriff would just hardclaim their guilty.

Yes but Porscha wasn’t sheriff is the whole premise of what I am saying.

 

1. Scum killed Porscha over Petey

2. Petey has claimed Doc

3. Scum must have thought porscha was a higher chance of being sheriff than was worth killing doc.

4. Porsha wasn’t sheriff so what I am saying is what scum likely thought not what they knew and obviously porscha wouldn’t have hardclaimed their guilt because again they weren’t sheriff. 
5. I feel like your argument to this is what a scum would say if this was the reason porscha was targeted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, KZA said:

COMUNICADO OFICIAL - VOTE COUNT

 

Blue Jay 22 (4) - iambrad, Naslund, dallsbeep, MidKnight Ego
iambrad (3) - porscha, Ilunga, 112
Sharpshooter (2) - Time Lord, luckylager
porscha (2) - Qwags, Blue Jay 22
MidKnight Ego (1) - Sharpshooter
Naslund (1) - Aladeen

 

No Vote (1) - SV.

 

5 Minutes, everyone put on some UK Drill and play some Mafia

This is significant because Time Lord wanted to vote Sharpshooter out.  Penultimate vote count before the final one

4 to Blue Jay 22
3 to iambrad
2 to Sharpshooter

20 hours ago, 112 said:

unvote vote sharpshooter

Ok. 4 - 2 - 3.  Sharpshooter gaining momentum

20 hours ago, Time Lord said:

still 4 - 2 - 3

Correct, but why even be concerned about iambrad (the 2 in this equation)

20 hours ago, Qwags said:

Unvote Vote IamBrad

Interesting.  This leaves it 4 - 3 - 3.  But if you go to any of Qwags' lists, he's been namedropping Sharpshooter as part of the scum team, so why not vote there?  Scum-contrived move or Qwags moment - you be the judge.

20 hours ago, Time Lord said:

Unvote, vote brad

4 -4 tie.

20 hours ago, 112 said:

we just got qwagged

Yeah, we did.

20 hours ago, Blue Jay 22 said:

Unvote vote Brad

5-4.  Comeback complete.

  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Aladeen said:

Yes but Porscha wasn’t sheriff is the whole premise of what I am saying.

 

1. Scum killed Porscha over Petey

2. Petey has claimed Doc

3. Scum must have thought porscha was a higher chance of being sheriff than was worth killing doc.

4. Porsha wasn’t sheriff so what I am saying is what scum likely thought not what they knew and obviously porscha wouldn’t have hardclaimed their guilt because again they weren’t sheriff. 
5. I feel like your argument to this is what a scum would say if this was the reason porscha was targeted. 

Ah, I follow your logic now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...