Popular Post PhillipBlunt Posted January 7 Author Popular Post Share Posted January 7 23 minutes ago, Jaimito said: Drance is an absolute stool sample. 4 2 1 1 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted January 7 Author Share Posted January 7 45 minutes ago, Captkirk888 said: Yah, he's bussin and keepin it 100. Such a fleek dude it's lit! He's really pushin P lol Fleek? Wha? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.AM.THE.WALRUS Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 1 hour ago, CanuckFanForever said: If the Canucks had no Quinn Hughes and this is a back end of a back to back for the Canucks, the Canucks lose truth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moeknows Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 3 minutes ago, Kragar said: Dude, you need to stop digging. You are getting so in over your head once more. If you are going to use game logs as the tool, and you actually checked his game log before making such an inane comment, you would see he has had a number of stinkers this year. And, often at home (philly, ducks, blue jackets to name a few) Yes, the game should have been better. Demko and a number of others had a rough outing, and the rest of the team carried the load. But your BS, pretty much game in, game out, is laughable. You have some legit points, but the hyperbole you use instead of facts shows you to be more full of crap than you probably are. No he's that full of crap! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocket-68 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Tusk said: We had Manny Malhotra for that before. Was successful for Horvat and Sedins if I recall. You are right, after Malholtra's eye injury, I seem to recall he did join the staff on some level helping with faceoffs for a little bit ... not sure what his title was but it wasn't a Faceoff Coach. Edited January 7 by Rocket-68 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted January 7 Author Share Posted January 7 3 minutes ago, Taphouse Canuck said: So long New Jersey and your shitty city The monkey has been removed 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Sharpshooter Posted January 7 Popular Post Share Posted January 7 2 minutes ago, Randy Marsh said: How do we know if someone is 'trolling'? Maybe a person really believes what they are saying? Whether a person should believe what they believe is another question, but seems a bit presumptuous to label? Maybe that's just me. Also may I ask why is your name is colored blue? How do I make mine a different color? There are Site Rules posted. Trolling is generally understood for about 20 years now on the internet. If anyone isn’t aware about what Inciting or Trolling or Passive Aggressive posting is, then look it up. I won’t coddle anyone. Be an adult and you’ll be treated like one. Act like a petulant child and you’ll be Moderated as such. 1 3 3 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Buzzsaw- Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 2 minutes ago, Tusk said: its kinda what you would expect, one line was amazing and the Garlund Blue Josh line looked better than the other. This team needs its two top lines to both be threats. It is a mistake to load up the top line with both our top centers. The Coilers did that on and off for years, and got nowhere... They had the McDavid and Draisaitl line and nothing else. The Miller line works decently, even if the only permanent members are Miller/Boeser. And the Pettersson line can work equally well if you put a triggerman, i.e. Kuzzy, with Pettersson. Look at all the recent Cup winners... they all had top two lines working well. That was the situation with Vegas, with Colorado and with Tampa. When you have two lines who are threats, the other team cannot key on one. Tocchet needs to find a way for both lines to succeed. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawdzukes Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 1 hour ago, Moeknows said: How do I ignore him...people talk about it but how Go and click on the 3 lines at the top right of the page click on account click on ignore users then type in users name ( totally random example) 1 hour ago, HKSR said: That's what I've been saying for awhile! Petey should be on the wing like Marner and Stone. Yup, would give us tones of versatility. They really played well together today. 1 hour ago, Mikeyman109 said: But that didn’t happen. Is he providing alternate versions of how we could have lost? He should have his own choose your own adventure book where the Canucks lose in all different ways or they win but there is still a big down side to it. It would be a best seller I'm sure. 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tusk Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 1 minute ago, -Buzzsaw- said: This team needs its two top lines to both be threats. It is a mistake to load up the top line with both our top centers. The Coilers did that on and off for years, and got nowhere... They had the McDavid and Draisaitl line and nothing else. The Miller line works decently, even if the only permanent members are Miller/Boeser. And the Pettersson line can work equally well if you put a triggerman, i.e. Kuzzy, with Pettersson. Look at all the recent Cup winners... they all had top two lines working well. That was the situation with Vegas, with Colorado and with Tampa. When you have two lines who are threats, the other team cannot key on one. Tocchet needs to find a way for both lines to succeed. Also Miller/Boeser are playing the top opposing line. Should give Petey and company room to be more fancy. Kuz is the right guy but not sure if Mik is. Maybe Mik moves down? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NucksIn50 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 29 minutes ago, luckylager said: Who goes in for him? Like, I'm glad lotto line was reunited and looked amazing, but Suter line struggled and the 4th line issues cant be pinned on Aman really. Not pinning it on Aman - I actually like him as a depth bottom 4th line player. All I’m saying is we have a good problem on our hands but the Kuz benching/press box can stop now. Let the trio Suter/Mik/Kuz gain some steam. We have 2 lines going: 6-40-9 and 8-53-81. Go Canucks! 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captkirk888 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 4 minutes ago, PhillipBlunt said: Fleek? Wha? Im 58 but i have teens. Fleek = stylin 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 Just now, Tusk said: Also Miller/Boeser are playing the top opposing line. Should give Petey and company room to be more fancy. Kuz is the right guy but not sure if Mik is. Maybe Mik moves down? Mik is a good fit with Petey and he has the game to play any role. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 We won! We dominated. Holy craperolla the fishers are out tonight. Cowpies lost. Go fish their pond! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy Marsh Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 4 minutes ago, Sharpshooter said: There are Site Rules posted. Trolling is generally understood for about 20 years now on the internet. If anyone isn’t aware about what Inciting or Trolling or Passive Aggressive posting is, then look it up. I won’t coddle anyone. Be an adult and you’ll be treated like one. Act like a petulant child and you’ll be Moderated as such. I should have clicked on your name. You're a mod. Thats why your name is blue. Point taken. Thank you kindly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonoman Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 1 hour ago, CanuckFanForever said: compared to Boston the Canucks were weak and they deserved to lose and they did Marchand roughed up a Sedin and he and the team did nothing If Hamhuis hadn’t gone down after the hip check on Lucic and Rome suspended 4 games (still a sore point for me) it might have been a different ending. Calling the Canucks weak after winning a Presidents cup and winning 3 games in the finals, tells me you're only a pretend fan. 1 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cromeslab Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 Looks like oil and Vegas will win,we’ll see 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 Just now, Randy Marsh said: I should have clicked on your name. You're a mod. Thats why your name is blue. Point taken. Thank you kindly Just a fellow Canucks supporter, just like you. Cheers. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 1 minute ago, Sonoman said: If Hamhuis hadn’t gone down after the hip check on Lucic and Rome suspended 4 games (still a sore point for me) it might have been a different ending. Calling the Canucks weak after winning a Presidents cup and winning 3 games in the finals, tells me you're only a pretend fan. That poster is a button pusher. And he’s good at it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckylager Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 (edited) 11 minutes ago, NucksIn50 said: Not pinning it on Aman - I actually like him as a depth bottom 4th line player. All I’m saying is we have a good problem on our hands but the Kuz benching/press box can stop now. Let the trio Suter/Mik/Kuz gain some steam. We have 2 lines going: 6-40-9 and 8-53-81. Go Canucks! I dunno. I'm leaning towards hoping they trade kuz plus and add a legit top 6er that can actually support Petey. Both Mik and Kuz are decent options as the 3rd piece on a Petey line, I guess, but we don't have the scoring or centre depth to support a lotto line long term. IMO of course. Edited January 7 by luckylager Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tusk Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 2 minutes ago, Alflives said: That poster is a button pusher. And he’s good at it. like Shorty saying we havent won in 10 years and all the sudden its 5-4 instead of 5-2 late in 3rd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks curse Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 16 minutes ago, PhillipBlunt said: Drance is an absolute stool sample. I would think he has to be careful if ppl get too frustrated the media can replace him easily 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cromeslab Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 26 minutes ago, Tusk said: We had Manny Malhotra for that before. Was successful for Horvat and Sedins if I recall. That’s what we need right now some direction in the face off dot,looking at u Henrik 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckylager Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 1 minute ago, canucks curse said: I would think he has to be careful if ppl get too frustrated the media can replace him easily Nah. Drama and sensationalism sell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bure10Kuzmenko96 Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 1 hour ago, Rocket-68 said: Canucks win, Flames lost now if the Oilers get thumped by Ottawa, my night is complete ... well almost. Don't think that's gonna be happening 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.