RakuRaku Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Did most of you forget he's just a rental player?? We gave up way way too much... A first round pick and a top prospect in Hunter B??? Would've been alright if Tanev was also heading our way! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteyBOI Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 1 minute ago, Northern_Nuck said: I feel we’re not done yet. I still think we go all in and ship out lekkermaki, 2025 1st + for Guentzel. possible or tanev... lots of reports he was being mentioned this weekend... tanev 2 million retained for a 2025 1st... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimito Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Just now, Sell.the.team said: This is a pure rental, right? Seems like a steep price, especially in our first year back to the show. I don't see how on earth we can resign all our core guys unless they take serious discounts. Hard to say. This front office seems to find the right players that fit well with the team and what the coaches want. If he thrives, he can sign for less than what Kuz signed for next yr. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijjibo Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Vancouver did Montreal a solid here. Taking Lindholm off the market and paying a significant price for him. Price for Monahan just went up. Won't be as much as Lindholm, but they're going to get a great return on him 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockemSockem Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Let’s go! I haven’t been this excited for Canucks hockey in a while. We’re built win it all this year and looks like we’ll be good for a while. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 1 minute ago, The Duke said: Lack daddy officially invited to the cup party. Team Chef. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 3 minutes ago, Miss Korea said: Not even close dude. The man is walking straight to July 1 if that's all we're offering him It probably starts with 7 and could go to 8ish. Would be pretty big if we are capable of re-signing him. His play style is something we lack. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Wing Posted February 1 Popular Post Share Posted February 1 1 minute ago, Dom said: I don't disagree with this evaluation. The first was always going to be a must for this type of deal. Kuzy wasn't a fit for us and took up 5.5M cap. He has more value to me because we friggin love the guy (and we still do). Hunter B has been having a great yr. How he pans out in the NHL remains to be seen. It was more important that we didn't have to give up JL or TW. 5 2 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHL rocks Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 11 minutes ago, Junkyard Dog said: Tocchet gonna love Lindholm. Absolutely Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post DeNiro Posted February 1 Popular Post Share Posted February 1 1 minute ago, Sell.the.team said: This is a pure rental, right? Seems like a steep price, especially in our first year back to the show. I don't see how on earth we can resign all our core guys unless they take serious discounts. This move is directly related to Petey re-signing IMO. Like these are the types of players we can bring in if you sign a reasonable contract. If Lindholm is a fit with Petey they’ll find a way to get it done. They won’t go into next season with only 3 top 6 forwards. They’ll find a way to squeeze him in. 3 2 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnstorm Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 1 minute ago, RWJC said: The prized worm. The type of two way worm you need for playoffs. Wormalicious. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curmudgeon Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 17 minutes ago, Dom said: Basically Kuzmenko + Bruz for Lindholm. And with Willander being the better RHD prospect, it doesn't hurt quite as much losing Brzustewicz. All the same, it would have been nice to see how he performed as a pro before losing him. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Duke Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 2 minutes ago, Northern_Nuck said: I feel we’re not done yet. I still think we go all in and ship out lekkermaki, 2025 1st + for Guentzel. As fun as that craziness would be, to me, this signals that management knows an extended run is dependent on rolling Lekkerimaki, Hoglander and Podkolzin in the near future as we let some of Joshua, Bleuger and Laffrety get their bag with other organizations. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R3aL Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 We also have to consider Colorado was bidding on him too most likely 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sell.the.team Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Jaimito said: Hard to say. This front office seems to find the right players that fit well with the team and what the coaches want. If he thrives, he can sign for less than what Kuz signed for next yr. I don't see how that happens unless he wants to stay at a few million below market. He is coming off making $4.8M - I am guessing he wants a raise. The cap is going up. I reckon he will be able to fetch upwards of $8M per season, especially if his numbers improve. Knowing this regime, they will show him off (ala Beuvillier last year) which will only increase his asking price. Edited February 1 by Sell.the.team Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Just now, DeNiro said: This move is directly related to Petey re-signing IMO. Like these are the types of players we can bring in if you sign a reasonable contract. If Lindholm is a fit with Petey they’ll find a way to get it done. They won’t go into next season with only 3 top 6 forwards. They’ll find a way to squeeze him in. If they do re-sign Lindholm that’ll be huge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 6 minutes ago, CanucksCountry said: I'm conflicted Kuzmenko and 1st and Brzustewicz Is ALOT hope it works out for the best Kuz is a perimeter player who, in RT's system would likely be benched in PO. HB has boom/bust potential, who knows? EL is a Selke level player, the EXACT player any legit PO team would want to add. We won this imo. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd. Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Definitely wasn’t as high on Brzustewicz as others. Leads the CHL in points but there’s a lot of Adam Clendening vibes I get from him. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R3aL Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Just now, DeNiro said: This move is directly related to Petey re-signing IMO. Like these are the types of players we can bring in if you sign a reasonable contract. If Lindholm is a fit with Petey they’ll find a way to get it done. They won’t go into next season with only 3 top 6 forwards. They’ll find a way to squeeze him in. I’m hoping they fit in together and want to sign reasonably to buy into that yea! Not like the Toronto culture we will find out soon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highandinside Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Rentals are always expensive. We have to take a run at it when we have a chance. We still have our top prospects! I love this deal. Lindholm is a swede , 200 foot player l, offensive stud, will help PP it checks every box Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Screw Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 I think this is the rare trade that both fan bases can appreciate. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R3aL Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Just now, Odd. said: Definitely wasn’t as high on Brzustewicz as others. Leads the CHL in points but there’s a lot of Adam Clendening vibes I get from him. Well let’s hope you are right Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grandmaster Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Good trade. We get a proper top 6 forward who plays well at center and great at faceoffs. He is 2 years removed from Selke conversation and can obviously play defence well. Our second line is now a force. Meanwhile, we get rid of Kuzy and his Cap next year. We basically used a 32nd OA pick, our 3rd or 4th best prospect and didn’t throw in JL or Willander 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Devron Posted February 1 Popular Post Share Posted February 1 Best of luck Kuzy. Up there with Vanek and Demitra as shorterm favourites for me 16 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKSR Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 1 minute ago, DeNiro said: This move is directly related to Petey re-signing IMO. Like these are the types of players we can bring in if you sign a reasonable contract. If Lindholm is a fit with Petey they’ll find a way to get it done. They won’t go into next season with only 3 top 6 forwards. They’ll find a way to squeeze him in. Yup, Petey take a little bit less and we can keep Lindholm here too. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Posted by Jaimito,
Official Trade Announcement
Recommended by Roger Neilsons Towel
10 reactions
Go to this post
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.