DeNiro Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 4 minutes ago, Smashian Kassian said: Omg those are god awful. Kill it with fire. That being said they could wear sombreros on their heads and I wouldn’t care if they’re winning. 1 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rip The Mesh Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 1 minute ago, Rip The Mesh said: Hughes-Myers just doesn’t work, they’ve tried it before. Glad they went back to Hughes-Hronek. That pair allows us to dominate possession when they’re on the ice. Then the other pairs just have to be even and we’re good. 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barn Burner Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 4 minutes ago, DeNiro said: Hughes-Myers just doesn’t work, they’ve tried it before. Glad they went back to Hughes-Hronek. That pair allows us to dominate possession when they’re on the ice. Then the other pairs just have to be even and we’re good. Based on what we're working with now, I'd rather have Cole with Myers. Zadorov/Juulsen. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strawbone Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 48 minutes ago, Rip The Mesh said: More promotions? Gonna go blind. I don’t hate those like everyone else seems to. Way better than the silver of LA or gold of Vegas. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lewlowned Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Strawbone said: I don’t hate those like everyone else seems to. Way better than the silver of LA or gold of Vegas. I agree they are much better than the LA and Vegas chrome helmets. They aren't awful, but I still don't like them. Should've stuck with the matte theme and done matte blue helmets instead. Edited January 23 by Lewlowned 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Rip The Mesh Posted January 23 Popular Post Share Posted January 23 Tell it like it is, 4 2 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 22 minutes ago, DeNiro said: Hughes-Myers just doesn’t work, they’ve tried it before. Glad they went back to Hughes-Hronek. That pair allows us to dominate possession when they’re on the ice. Then the other pairs just have to be even and we’re good. I think Tocchet could see how much more Hronek needs Hughes than Hughes needs Hronek. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 2 minutes ago, Rip The Mesh said: Tell it like it is, Paterson is always searching for more soundbites. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rip The Mesh Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 10 minutes ago, PhillipBlunt said: Paterson is always searching for more soundbites. Well he got the truth on this one! LOL, probably not quite what he was expecting, mmm 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pure961089 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Crossbar Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Hughes needs Hronek as much. It's why they're dominating. Hronek is allowing him to open up. They intuitively work off each other. Hronek intuitively knows what Hughes wants to do. Great breakdown of how they work together. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buddyguy Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 If we can't land a big fish, that's ok too. I wouldn't mind if we bring in depth guys like Higgins, Lapierre types. They won't really interrupt the chemistry we already have, but they are capable of adding some scoring depth when the time comes. We could also use another bottom pairing or depth dman to cover for injuries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Lotto line still together. Hmm 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 16 hours ago, Tofu_Bud said: Im getting sooooo bored w these W’s Ahahaha. Something doesn't feel right does it.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pure961089 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 (edited) Quinn Hughes Puck Possession So to break it down into tiers there is the first line 1st tier Quinn Hughes 54:27 there is no second tier - Nobody in the 40s The 3rd tier Edited January 23 by Pure961089 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolboarder Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 To be honest, I am happy with the way the roster is working and I feel that we do not need to trade for 2C even though Suter is not 2C. If Kuzmenko is getting better, and is playing the way RT wants him to play and I feel that he is doing what RT asked him to do and it takes time to become a habit. If anything, we can get Petterson and Miller split up when it is needed if Kuzmenko is reverting back in the form and Mik getting better with hiss speed and the hands is catching up to the speed. Lotto line will always be an option if we ever need some sparks in our game down the road. Why waste an asset at the risk of breaking up the chemistry. I feel that all of 4 lines are having a good chemistry together even if it's low-scoring game. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 1 hour ago, Dr. Crossbar said: Hughes needs Hronek as much. It's why they're dominating. Hronek is allowing him to open up. They intuitively work off each other. Hronek intuitively knows what Hughes wants to do. Great breakdown of how they work together. You'll probably get some push back on this even though it isn't warranted. 1 hour ago, Pure961089 said: Something about them looks less tacky than the king's and knights buckets Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spook007 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 6 hours ago, stawns said: Going "all in" this year probably significantly decreases your chances in the next 3-4 years, which is when I think they truly become contenders I guess it depends on what "all in" means, in terms of what they give up Well only if they can keep a hold of Petey and QH... If QH leaves at the end of his contract it may start to fall apart... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 11 minutes ago, Pure961089 said: Quinn Hughes Puck Possession So to break it down into tiers there is the first line 1st tier Quinn Hughes 54:27 there is no second tier - Nobody in the 40s The 3rd tier Hughes controls the game like a select few. Orr, Lidstrom, Harvey. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Just now, spook007 said: Well only if they can keep a hold of Petey and QH... If QH leaves at the end of his contract it may start to fall apart... As with Petey, I assume they wouldn't let them just walk. A trade involving either player would completely re-stock the org. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKSR Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 2 hours ago, Pure961089 said: Haha he's such a grumpy fella... love it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Just now, spook007 said: Well only if they can keep a hold of Petey and QH... If QH leaves at the end of his contract it may start to fall apart... IMHAO we will be adding Jack and Luke Hughes at some point. The boys grew up in TO. Quinn plays in a rabid hockey market. Jack and Luke will want to join him. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spook007 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 1 minute ago, stawns said: As with Petey, I assume they wouldn't let them just walk. A trade involving either player would completely re-stock the org. True, but a restock doesn't give them back players of their caliber... It will likely be lesser players, and prospects/picks... So its a huge question mark, what happens next. I believe, we have 2 windows... this year and next, and in 3 and onwards... But it depends on us holding on to the core players. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spook007 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 3 minutes ago, Alflives said: IMHAO we will be adding Jack and Luke Hughes at some point. The boys grew up in TO. Quinn plays in a rabid hockey market. Jack and Luke will want to join him. Maybe... doubt it I think more likely they all end up somewhere in a US tax haven if they really want to leave their teams. Personally I'd prefer Bedard, but doubt that happens aa well... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.