Jump to content

★[PGT] Canucks vs CBJ Jan 27, 2024


Jaimito

Recommended Posts

20.6 On-Ice Video Review of Major Penalties – Referees shall review all plays that result in the assessment of any Major Penalty (other than a Major Penalty for Fighting) for the purpose of confirming (or modifying) their original call on the ice.

 

The Referee shall have the following options after video review of his own call: (i) confirming his original Major Penalty call; (ii) reducing his original Major Penalty call to a lesser penalty; or (iii) rescinding the original Major Penalty altogether.

 

So they.... modified the original call...?

  • Confused 1
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good first 

horrible second 

great third 

refs making up rules  but  Myers with a Myers move 

Ot Win

33 wins which more than any team 

tops in the league 

 

 

Brock with 30 and a hat trick 

Time for a break get heathy and rested. 
IMG_3974.thumb.jpeg.2413ca969c05704e1e6d3e171bc7d452.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was the non calls on Kuraly that lead to the Myers elbow.  I'm glad he did it.  Kuraly was asking for it.  But it was darn strange how they arrived at that call.  TBH it should have been two minors but how they cancelled one major and added another on one replay is incomprehensible.  GCG!

  • Cheers 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Miss Korea said:

20.6 On-Ice Video Review of Major Penalties – Referees shall review all plays that result in the assessment of any Major Penalty (other than a Major Penalty for Fighting) for the purpose of confirming (or modifying) their original call on the ice.

 

The Referee shall have the following options after video review of his own call: (i) confirming his original Major Penalty call; (ii) reducing his original Major Penalty call to a lesser penalty; or (iii) rescinding the original Major Penalty altogether.

 

So they.... modified the original call...?

Rescinded and then modified the call.  That's probably gonna be the explanation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tocchet.A.Hockey.God said:

Refs have to be accountable and the league needs to explain that decision 

Decision was wrong

 

refs look terrible here

 

nowhere in the rulings say that a major penalty can be transferred to another player

 

they should have shut their mouths kept the interference call and moved on

 

but if there is no discipline for this botched call then it sets a dangerous example for refs to start ego tripping more than ever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...