Devron Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 1 hour ago, tas said: E4/5 Keep seeing this. What does that mean exactly? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck You Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 5 minutes ago, Devron said: Keep seeing this. What does that mean exactly? It's a rating system used by the douche called Eklund who is mostly wrong. E 1-5..E1 means not close, E4-5 means it's happening or happened. But don't put much stock in it. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tas Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 9 minutes ago, Devron said: Keep seeing this. What does that mean exactly? eh, if you don't know already, the story is too long and pointless and with too little payoff to explain it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Alflives Posted February 10 Popular Post Share Posted February 10 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Devron said: Keep seeing this. What does that mean exactly? E = Empties. E-5 is how many empties Alf made that day. The more empties; the more accurate the prediction. This is an E-5 Edited February 10 by Alflives 8 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lionized27 Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 19 minutes ago, Alflives said: E = Empties. E-5 is how many empties Alf made that day. The more empties; the more accurate the prediction. This is an E-5 AKA: 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cromeslab Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Why would we do this.,…,,, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Hughes Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 14 minutes ago, Cromeslab said: Why would we do this.,…,,, No kidding. What are we playing Ringette? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slegr Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Phil Kessel is oooooold, his point production has almost evaporated, and he’s a -155 over his career, including six consecutive minus years over the past six seasons. Why is Tocchet so onboard with a guy like him and not with Kuz? Sure, he’s been on cup winning teams, but he’s getting so fat now. So fat. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteyBOI Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 because he is a 3 time champion about to be 4 time champion... im sure phil is skating and is fresh and feeling good... some playoff team will sign him 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rypien-Punch Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Tom Wilson is more of the type of guy Tocchet will want in his line up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Korea Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 11 minutes ago, Rypien-Punch said: Tom Wilson is more of the type of guy Tocchet will want in his line up He's locked in for a lot of money for a lot of years - $6.5M for the next 7. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rypien-Punch Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 1 minute ago, Miss Korea said: He's locked in for a lot of money for a lot of years - $6.5M for the next 7. He is well worth it 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N4ZZY Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 1 hour ago, Rypien-Punch said: He is well worth it who's moving out if Wilson is coming in? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRover Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 (edited) yenno, it really is so appropriate that it took a bunch of junk swinging yankees to light this team up again. canadians and europeans are so milque-toaste nanny state pauperists now. 1776 will return Edited February 10 by RedRover 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuinnNorris Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 This might be a dressing room move to add some personality that they lost in trading Kuzmenko. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 On 2/8/2024 at 4:11 PM, Diamonds said: Probably just because he looks like he sits at a desk all day and not like a pro athlete. Hey man, what's wrong with that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grandmaster Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 7 hours ago, Rypien-Punch said: He is well worth it Wait what? You’re saying Tom Wilson worth that albatross of a contract? Wow! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 On 2/8/2024 at 10:01 PM, Thundernuts said: Of course you do. He hasn’t played since last season. Hed just sign somewhere else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks curse Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 7 hours ago, Miss Korea said: He's locked in for a lot of money for a lot of years - $6.5M for the next 7. Ewwww lawson Crouse please then we can let Joshua go in off season Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 8 hours ago, Rypien-Punch said: He is well worth it 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck You Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 9 hours ago, Rypien-Punch said: He is well worth it You can't just keep bringing in heavy contracts that are long term..We have to clean up our backyard first, Lots of expiring contracts to re-sign. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 12 hours ago, Slegr said: Phil Kessel is oooooold, his point production has almost evaporated, and he’s a -155 over his career, including six consecutive minus years over the past six seasons. Why is Tocchet so onboard with a guy like him and not with Kuz? Sure, he’s been on cup winning teams, but he’s getting so fat now. So fat. I mean Toronto was complete dog shit when he was there so judging a career offensive player on plus minus is flawed as hell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamonds Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 3 hours ago, Bob Long said: Hey man, what's wrong with that? Nothing, just that people expect pro athletes to look a certain way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 11 hours ago, Rypien-Punch said: He is well worth it With his injury history and term and cap hit I'm not so sure and I love Tom Wilson. Hasn't played a full season since 2016/17, has played 68 or less games 5 of the last 7 and coming off surgeries. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasCanuck Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 With his multi-cup experience, as long as he was signed at a rate where we could assign him to Abbotsford if he's not working out and can't keep up, 1 year, 1 Million prorated might make sense for Canucks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.