Captain Kirk Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 1 hour ago, Pears said: "iT wAs ShOuLdEr To HeAd" Nice editing job......lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Screw Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 I am really surprised with the two games. No injury and it seemed like the bonked heads. 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Kirk Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Good thing it wasn't the playoffs the League would have given Zod a ten game suspension............FIXED!@ 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmkk Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Soft calls on the penalty shot and hit. At least big Z will be back vs Det again. This time the hit will be through the boards. F the refs and Paros they dumb AF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spook007 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 (edited) 6 hours ago, Blue said: The trade is off. But who had a rough game ? The trade is on for them. Thats how this fanbase works Yeah its a bit over the top for some.... there are 5 groups 1. yeah Canucks are the best regardless 2. canucks is my team and just about perfect 3. Canucks are ok, still probably could be better with some changes. 4. Canucks need to make changes, players are not good enough, and their trades not the best. 5. Canucks suck, doesn't matter if they are top in the NHL, they suck... Luckily the vast majority is in group 2 and 3, although everytime we lose a game, a section seems to fall into group 4.... The 2-5 poster in Group 5 will never change. The could win the Cup, and they'd still moan about how or why.... And they already have their book of excuses and moans ready, should the wheels come off.... We are all Canucks... (even Group 5... maybe) Edited February 11 by spook007 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post EdgarM Posted February 11 Popular Post Share Posted February 11 1 hour ago, Elias Pettersson said: The issue isn’t even Garland himself. It’s the money he’s being paid. No way we can afford to re-sign Petey, Hronek and Lindholm if we are paying a 3rd line winger $5 million, regardless what else he does on the ice. I think we move Höglander up to teh 3rd line next year and move Garland in the summer. At least he has positive trade value now… Luckily this management group knows what we should be paying and who we should keep and who we should trade. I'm a gonna leave it up to them to make the right moves that betters this TEAM. 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 6 minutes ago, Captain Kirk said: Nice editing job......lol Missed his head in that picture and yes the follow threw both hit heads so that's accidental and both are responsible. What a joke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyD Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 3 hours ago, Gawdzukes said: You don't understand the finer points of reffing then. It's not a comparison to other points in the game. I understand them I just heavily disagree with the notion that what we saw from Hughes is an infraction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted February 11 Author Share Posted February 11 Fuck this league and it’s inconsistency. Parros is a puppet. 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spook007 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 13 minutes ago, Captain Kirk said: Two game suspension for a head on head, yeah right, what a corrupt, biases, old boys school. If Reilly doesn't get a least two games then we'll know the league is fixed. NHL player safety already preparing for the Canucks in the play offs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Attila Umbrus Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 15 minutes ago, PhillipBlunt said: Seems odd that the league made such a quick decision on Zadorov’s hit. I thought it odd as well. But since we play another early one tmrw they announced it tonight. Still BS, at least it’s only 2 games. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzle Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Two games for that???? Next thing you know they’re gonna be handing out penalty shots for light shoves…. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustRich Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 The thing I like about this years team is they adjust after having a couple of bad games , so I'll reserve judgement on the last two performances. You'd think after the last decade of pain that some of you would have adjusted as well to not getting too high with the highs, and low with the lows. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdgarM Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 4 minutes ago, Dizzle said: Two games for that???? Next thing you know they’re gonna be handing out penalty shots for light shoves…. We are already seeing penalties for clean hits, and players going after guys after clean hits. Things are a changing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 5 minutes ago, EdgarM said: We are already seeing penalties for clean hits, and players going after guys after clean hits. Things are a changing. Time to get rid of the instagter penalties as that would clean things up again. Marchant would be settled down more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elias Pettersson Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 (edited) 1 hour ago, Gurn said: Goalies get very few points, should they be getting minimum wage? Or maybe, just maybe there is more to hockey, than points? Things like a well balanced line up, and players that play well together? Goalies don’t get paid to score goals. So why even make some a dumb comparison? Everyone knows players get paid based on production. You can try and justify what Garland does versus what he gets paid, but any competent GM knows he’s overpaid. Edited February 11 by Elias Pettersson 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnthonyG Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Worst fucking penalty fucking shot fucking call fucking ever. fucking. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuckfanforlife82 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 (edited) 2 hours ago, Blue said: And in this game we battled back for the lead on the road with the backup goalie. And the only reason we didn't get 2 points was a piss weak call that resulted in a penalty shot. I heard the end of the game on the radio. After seeing it on the highlights, i am in total disbelief. It was a complete fucking joke. We had 2 players get flattened with a cross check in OT and those weren't called. The Rangers and there was another one. And yet they call this. Which is fine i guess. But it shows that we have 3 losses that weren't on merit. So without garbage calls , our record is even better. And yet this is a game that canuckfan82 and Dom are crying about. It's just unreal. Oh and we don't have Saucy. When we went on our win-lose streak , it was without saucy also Ok you stick with we lost because of garbage calls. Funny you are saying I don’t know hockey when you are blaming the refs. We were up by two and took a penalty in the offensive zone. They let this one get away. I am not going to put the blame on the refs. I am said I thought Miller and Boeser had another quiet night. So what, am I wrong? The team has not played to its staples. Tochett has even said it. So what is wrong about stating that? Stop with the we are crying when even the coach is upset about the losses. I guess he doesn’t know hockey either. You are a comic at times. Then you have to rant to try to get people to agree with you. Are you that hard up for attention. Keep pleading your case to try to get everyone to side with you. Very comical. Edited February 11 by Canuckfanforlife82 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 42 minutes ago, Captain Kirk said: Nice editing job......lol No editing at at all......lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanuckDownUnder Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 3 hours ago, coho8888 said: maybe because there are some chicken littles in here that are predicting doom and gloom for the rest of the season based on two games. Sort of. I think it is also the haunting of the last 5 years or so. A bit of "on no, here we go again". A couple good games will erase that. Another bad one or to will be an issue for everyone's confidence. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuckfanforlife82 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 2 minutes ago, CanuckDownUnder said: Sort of. I think it is also the haunting of the last 5 years or so. A bit of "on no, here we go again". A couple good games will erase that. Another bad one or to will be an issue for everyone's confidence. I haven’t heard anyone say we suck again. Made up if you ask me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdgarM Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 14 minutes ago, Elias Pettersson said: Goalies don’t get paid to score goals. So why even make some a dumb comparison? Everyone knows players get paid based on production. You can try and justify what Garland does versus what he gets paid, but any competent GM knows he’s overpaid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elias Pettersson Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 4 minutes ago, EdgarM said: Garland was on the trade block last year. His agent was even given permission to shop him around. Nobody wanted him at $5 million. It was reported that the Canucks would need to retain at least $1.5 million in order to trade him. I wonder why that is? I can’t even believe I am having a debate about whether Garland is overpaid or not… 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimito Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck You Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 17 minutes ago, Pears said: No editing at at all......lol They are after us now! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.