dannydog Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Not a good look from our Captain. But I guess we get a point though should have had 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPA Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Miller Lindholm Boeser line didn’t look good. It was better with Suter as he was more aggressive on the forecheck. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dom Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Just now, kilgore said: Naw. Not for me yet. That penalty was a bit of a collision. I don't see Z going out of his way, losing his temper, to cost us penalties. He's a big tough Ruskie who'll be invaluable once playoff rules apply. Getting bounced in 4 in the first round. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuckfanforlife82 Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Just now, Captain Kirk said: Class guy to not keep pummelling him when he went down. At least we are winning in fights. Setting the bar high for this group. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 You could see the fire in Hughes eyes burning at the end of the game. I expect him to come back on a mission tomorrow. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Buzzsaw- Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 I see the Petey whiners have shutup at least. Game not exactly a shining example of Refereeing... how is Hughes catching up to the breakaway and pushing Walman down a penalty? Otherwise a decent effort by the team... Detroit is a good team... they will be in the top 25% of the league for a while. On to the next game. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24K Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Well if anything this should help us not win the curse that is the Presidents trophy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanuckMan Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 1 minute ago, Canuckfanforlife82 said: I could easily see us being 1-2-1 after tomorrows game. The excuse of we played yesterday and it’s an early game will likely reel it’s ugly head. Well it will be a pretty even game. Capitals are playing the Bruins right now. So both teams will play on a back to back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Saw this risky play from Zadorov in Calgary, again he is far from the perfect physical defenceman we need but he's relatively cheap and fills a role for us. Sad to see, when we sold our players and lost Tanev, Toffoli and Markstrom to Calgary they were in their prime and helped Calgary win. Now on the flip side we take Zadorov and Lindholm...so far these trades aren't looking as good as they should. To be fair to them they're both on low caps at the moment and are playing to their cap, but we paid a heck of a lot for the duo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Kirk Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Man i don't know how Miller didn't score with 8 shots on net? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlwaysACanuckFan Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 (edited) Not the bounce back result I was hoping for Edited February 10 by AlwaysACanuckFan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinatcc Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Calgary won again maybe Canucks can trade Zadorov and Lindholm back to Calgary I did something similar in GM mode 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Special shout out to how good our PP looked zipping it around but how we didn't score, we're going to really have to work on having a new style out there. Lindholm looked great as a net front presence in the Carolina game but we don't see the Miller walk in shot/pass or Petey one timer much anymore - they didn't even really try those plays tonight. They were all sort of rotating around, looked a bit different. Still very fluid, but different and not really many set plays or opportunities. Our best chances came from Hughes just wristing it on net and hoping for a tip or rebound. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boudrias Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Just now, DeNiro said: Disagree. He’s been winning faceoffs and been a great add to our pk. The offense will come. I don't have a problem if the team flatlines for a few games. It will make them review their game and then rebuild towards playoffs. What I particularly noticed in both the Canes and Bruins games were how aggressively they forechecked the Canucks. In both the ozone and dzone and on the Canuck PP. Are NHL teams now thinking better to get up and close than allowing the boys to zip the puck around? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rip The Mesh Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post DeNiro Posted February 10 Popular Post Share Posted February 10 Just now, Rip The Mesh said: Juulsen was the star of the game for me. Brilliant play from him all around. 4 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kilgore Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 1 minute ago, -Buzzsaw- said: I see the Petey whiners have shutup at least. Game not exactly a shining example of Refereeing... how is Hughes catching up to the breakaway and pushing Walman down a penalty? Otherwise a decent effort by the team... Detroit is a good team... they will be in the top 25% of the league for a while. On to the next game. Thought the same. Less of a crosscheck, more of a shove from behind. Isn't that allowed? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimito Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Demko and Laffy back in tomorrow is my guess. Who comes out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlwaysACanuckFan Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 2 minutes ago, 24K said: Well if anything this should help us not win the curse that is the Presidents trophy. I don't care if they win it or not, what I really want to see if we can win a round first Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimito Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 1 minute ago, Rip The Mesh said: Forgot Nux were playing with 5 D for big chunk of the game. Doesn't help. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlwaysACanuckFan Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 2 minutes ago, iinatcc said: Calgary won again maybe Canucks can trade Zadorov and Lindholm back to Calgary I did something similar in GM mode They haven't lost since Kuz arrived there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanuckMan Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 2 minutes ago, DownUndaCanuck said: Special shout out to how good our PP looked zipping it around but how we didn't score, we're going to really have to work on having a new style out there. Lindholm looked great as a net front presence in the Carolina game but we don't see the Miller walk in shot/pass or Petey one timer much anymore - they didn't even really try those plays tonight. They were all sort of rotating around, looked a bit different. Still very fluid, but different and not really many set plays or opportunities. Our best chances came from Hughes just wristing it on net and hoping for a tip or rebound. Special shout out to the PP today for not letting in a short handed goal. I think the problem with the PP is too much fancy passing around and not enough shooting and crashing the net. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24K Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 1 minute ago, AlwaysACanuckFan said: I don't care if they win it or not, what I really want to see if we can win a round first Think this core already proved they can win a round already. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimito Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 2 minutes ago, DownUndaCanuck said: Special shout out to how good our PP looked zipping it around but how we didn't score, we're going to really have to work on having a new style out there. Lindholm looked great as a net front presence in the Carolina game but we don't see the Miller walk in shot/pass or Petey one timer much anymore - they didn't even really try those plays tonight. They were all sort of rotating around, looked a bit different. Still very fluid, but different and not really many set plays or opportunities. Our best chances came from Hughes just wristing it on net and hoping for a tip or rebound. PP was better. Didn't give up a SHG 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 1 minute ago, DownUndaCanuck said: Special shout out to how good our PP looked zipping it around but how we didn't score, we're going to really have to work on having a new style out there. Lindholm looked great as a net front presence in the Carolina game but we don't see the Miller walk in shot/pass or Petey one timer much anymore - they didn't even really try those plays tonight. They were all sort of rotating around, looked a bit different. Still very fluid, but different and not really many set plays or opportunities. Our best chances came from Hughes just wristing it on net and hoping for a tip or rebound. Not sure why Petey continues to play that spot on the powerplay. You’re wasting his shot there when he does actually decide to shoot. If it’s not a perfect one time pass he never tries and the pkers all see it coming. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.