Screw Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 He will block a shot and shatter like a teacup before the playoffs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijjibo Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grumpyone Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 The Calgary Flames have completed a deal to send defenceman Chris Tanev to the Dallas Stars in exchange for a 2024 second-round pick, a conditional 2026 third-round pick and 20-year-old defenceman Artem Grushnikov. The New Jersey Devils will receive a 2026 fourth-round draft pick from the Stars as part of the deal and will send the rights to unsigned draft choice goaltender Cole Brady to the Flames. The Flames are retaining 50 per cent of Tanev's salary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Arrogant Worms Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 The Flames tank begins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil_314 Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 Wonder what the conditions are? 2nd, prospect D + 3rd for a pending UFA with retention is okay? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lionized27 Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Rekker said: Dallas looking good. Heiskanen - Tanev will be formidable, for sure. Edited February 29 by lionized27 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R3aL Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 2 minutes ago, grumpyone said: The Calgary Flames have completed a deal to send defenceman Chris Tanev to the Dallas Stars in exchange for a 2024 second-round pick, a conditional 2026 third-round pick and 20-year-old defenceman Artem Grushnikov. The New Jersey Devils will receive a 2026 fourth-round draft pick from the Stars as part of the deal and will send the rights to unsigned draft choice goaltender Cole Brady to the Flames. The Flames are retaining 50 per cent of Tanev's salary. Dallas that sounds like a great add for them damn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrammaInTheTub Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 So is it 50% or 75% retained? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijjibo Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 Just now, GrammaInTheTub said: So is it 50% or 75% retained? 75% 50% by the Flames then 50% of the remainder by NJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Korea Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 fuck it let's make a new thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lionized27 Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 1 minute ago, GrammaInTheTub said: So is it 50% or 75% retained? I'm guessing 50% CAL, 25% NJD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrJockitch Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 Dallas is going to be a tough out. Heiskanen is a fantastic player. Great goaltending. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 So.....Mik, Woo, and a 1st for Hanafin? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKSR Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 5 minutes ago, R3aL said: Dallas that sounds like a great add for them damn Totally is. As long as Tanev stays healthy, he's a top tier defensive defenceman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hammertime Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 Aww I'll feel bad when he steps infront of a Hronek blast March 28th 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lionized27 Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 5 minutes ago, Hammertime said: Aww I'll feel bad when he steps infront of a Hronek blast March 28th Username checks out. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 (edited) Double post. Edited February 29 by Ghostsof1915 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks curse Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 35 minutes ago, Screw said: He will block a shot and shatter like a teacup before the playoffs I mean that is a legit concern Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 On 2/22/2024 at 11:07 AM, Coconuts said: Teams give up 1sts for rentals every year Dallas makes a lot of sense, their biggest weak spot is probably RD and bringing in Tanev makes their already solid defensive team stronger I'm assuming whoever trades for him also tries to extend him as well, so he may very well not be a rental Benn, Seguin, and Pavelski aren't getting any younger, Dallas has a window now On 2/22/2024 at 12:40 PM, Coconuts said: Dallas is a scary central team, no doubt, Tanev could put them over the top 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boudrias Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 4 hours ago, Rekker said: Dallas looking good. Some of their key pieces getting up in age. Tanev might have a decent playoff but he has a lot of wear. I can see him eating @ puck in game 2. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 I bet the ask is a 2nd a 3rd and Artem Grushnikov 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kragar Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 I wonder what Dallas' ask will be now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coryberg Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 LeBrun was on tsn and said there was a 1st rounder on the table from another team but there was a contract with term coming with it. Could it have been Mikheyev and a 1st for Tanev? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 3 minutes ago, Coryberg said: LeBrun was on tsn and said there was a 1st rounder on the table from another team but there was a contract with term coming with it. Could it have been Mikheyev and a 1st for Tanev? For the sake of stirring the pot, yes Mikheyev cost us Tanev 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 26 minutes ago, Coconuts said: For the sake of stirring the pot, yes Mikheyev cost us Tanev 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts