qwijjibo Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 2 minutes ago, BabcocksChin said: Why does a team like Columbus give Gaudreau nearly 10 million per season? They thought they were better than they are. But here's the thing. They didn't have to give up anything other than cap space to get him and he's signed long term. All these proposals are asking for a rebuilding teams top young assets and Pettersson could walk away in a year. The two situations aren't remotely the same Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Arrogant Worms Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 4 minutes ago, BabcocksChin said: Why does a team like Columbus give Gaudreau nearly 10 million per season? He signed a new contract. He isnt walking away in a year. Do you even know what you are talking about ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
testycal Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 to put this to bed even he said this already...could Elias simply say that he stands by his original decision not to negotiate until after the season? So simple...yes he would have to re state his position but that one statement might shut down the trade Elias threads? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BabcocksChin Posted February 29 Author Share Posted February 29 14 minutes ago, The Arrogant Worms said: He signed a new contract. He isnt walking away in a year. Do you even know what you are talking about ? This is under the assumption that an extension would be in place with his new team. Let's take a step back from the ledge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BabcocksChin Posted February 29 Author Share Posted February 29 5 minutes ago, testycal said: to put this to bed even he said this already...could Elias simply say that he stands by his original decision not to negotiate until after the season? So simple...yes he would have to re state his position but that one statement might shut down the trade Elias threads? Please don't put this to bed, it's far too entertaining. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 (edited) Rantanen + Prospect for Petey. Mikko is 6'2" 218lbs & he plays hard. We need that in our top 6. I doubt Colorado does this. If they said yes, take it and run. Edited February 29 by Canucks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BabcocksChin Posted February 29 Author Share Posted February 29 We're still trading him!! Keep the discussions going Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hammertime Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 45 minutes ago, qwijjibo said: They thought they were better than they are. But here's the thing. They didn't have to give up anything other than cap space to get him and he's signed long term. All these proposals are asking for a rebuilding teams top young assets and Pettersson could walk away in a year. The two situations aren't remotely the same So MTL is out because they won't be competing any time soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijjibo Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 1 minute ago, Hammertime said: So MTL is out because they won't be competing any time soon. Yup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremy Hronek Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 (edited) For fun, Something around Pettersson to Tampa for Cirreli and Cernak (again, I wouldn’t do this, but just a hypothetical). Suter-Miller-Boeser Hoglander-Cirreli-Lindholm Joshua-Bluegar-Garland Mikheyev-Aman-Lafferty Hughes-Cernak Soucy-Hronek Cole-Zadorov Demko DeSmith Edited February 29 by Jeremy Hronek Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BabcocksChin Posted February 29 Author Share Posted February 29 26 minutes ago, Jeremy Hronek said: For fun, Something around Pettersson to Tampa for Cirreli and Cernak (again, I wouldn’t do this, but just a hypothetical). Suter-Miller-Boeser Hoglander-Cirreli-Lindholm Joshua-Bluegar-Garland Mikheyev-Aman-Lafferty Hughes-Cernak Soucy-Hronek Cole-Zadorov Demko DeSmith Sorry bruv. I strongly disagree with this proposal. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
occ78 Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 (edited) I would do Vancouver Pettersson for Buffalo Tuch Power 2024 1st resign Lindholm 6.75m x 4-5 years trade Mikheyev resign Hronek, Joshua, Blueger Edited February 29 by occ78 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevlar Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 12 hours ago, BabcocksChin said: So I for one think Petey will eventually resign. But, i cant say Petey is in Matthew's, Mackinnon, McDavid tier for salary. So If his Salary demands are any higher than 11, I think it may be best to Start weighing our options. Fantastic player, but has he been our MVP this year? I'd say that's reserved for Hughes, Miller and Demko. Here we go. I mean there should be no shortage of teams interested. We would most likely get an absolute haul for him. Anaheim L.Carlsson Luneau 1st 2025 2nd 2024 Columbus Fantilli Mateychuk 2025 1st Hawks (if they get number 1) Celebrini Vlasic 1st Leafs 2025 I also think Sens could be bound for some sort of bold culture move. I think Tkachuk would be a possibility (close friends with Quinn). All of these moves may even make us better. While allowing us to allocate the cap properly. Thoughts? I too think he will re-sign. I don't know what his demands are but the Canucks have a 12M AAV on the table which he has not signed... so maybe higher? He is not our team MVP but I think teams will pay through the nose to get him. A young (25y/o) center producing at 100 point pace with a 200-foot game. I think the price based on the Lindholm trade... who is a 29y/o defensive center on an expiring contract and definitely not producing as well as Petey (definitely not apples to apples)... should be a young roster player, a top prospect, a mid-level prospect, a first and a second. (Am I overvaluing him?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 I know many here will get in their feels about the proposal. But for a discussion forum they do try their hardest to step on any discussion. One of the major issues though is, we don't really know who he'd sign with. Contenders make sense, but most of them don't have the pieces I'd care for. Also, I would not trade Petey to a divisional rival for anything other than one of the biggest trades in history. Lol. Say what you will about the guy, but he produces and he produces well. Send him East. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 1 hour ago, JeremyCuddles said: I know many here will get in their feels about the proposal. But for a discussion forum they do try their hardest to step on any discussion. One of the major issues though is, we don't really know who he'd sign with. Contenders make sense, but most of them don't have the pieces I'd care for. Also, I would not trade Petey to a divisional rival for anything other than one of the biggest trades in history. Lol. Say what you will about the guy, but he produces and he produces well. Send him East. Seems like we are signing him for the long term. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 1 hour ago, Alflives said: Seems like we are signing him for the long term. Petey at 27/28 could show us the best canuck performance ever. Foppa level Petey. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpeg.dc4d33b78c1c35abe470f5e426e2d1ca.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.