Integra250 Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 25 minutes ago, Shekky said: That would be a bad look on the Canucks lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 The mad lad Rekker might be onto something with Lindholm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoop Hogg Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 6 minutes ago, Integra250 said: That would be a bad look on the Canucks lol It’s buyer’s remorse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Vanderhoek Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 8 minutes ago, higgyfan said: Yes, Vatrano. Unfortunately, your or my preference isn't particularly valid in this circumstance. If the Canucks want to upgrade their top 6 at TDL, it will be at a high price. I think the price will include Podz. I doubt there are many Canuck fans that want to see Podz moved, but we have no vote in the management decisions. Not so much a preference thing, if you are saying a 1st rounder, Podkolzin and a prospect one of which was identified as possible Raty for a Vatrano ? My opinion is that is insane, my reference would be NO and I would think the Canucks would eventually stop laughing at some point in order to atleast end that call if that was the ask. I am sure Vancouver is working on multiple fronts, I just don't see them going big in on another forward. I got the impression Tocchet is a Vatrano fan sure but that is not a realistic price to pay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Vanderhoek Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 3 minutes ago, Snoop Hogg said: It’s buyer’s remorse. Only a segment of the fan base has buyers remorse on the Lindholm deal. He is a player the team targeted for quit some time and he is a very logical fit for this club. Tocchet is giddy over his addition to the club. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuck1991 Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 guentzel and toffolli. Cant win games if they dont score enough goals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby James Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 Vatrano would cost a lot but I like the 2 years on him. I'm not really interested in spending a bunch on a rental. I'd rather they go for a depth piece or two and run it as the group is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 6 minutes ago, Mike Vanderhoek said: Only a segment of the fan base has buyers remorse on the Lindholm deal. He is a player the team targeted for quit some time and he is a very logical fit for this club. Tocchet is giddy over his addition to the club. Lindholm hasn’t had a steady line mate since he got here. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim McMahon Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 18 minutes ago, Integra250 said: That would be a bad look on the Canucks lol It would actually show that management owns up to mistakes and can move on from them. Unlike the last 10 years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 19 minutes ago, Integra250 said: That would be a bad look on the Canucks lol There’s always bs at the deadline, but we’ll see 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Vanderhoek Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 1 minute ago, Devron said: Lindholm hasn’t had a steady line mate since he got here. Yeah I would prefer Tocchet goes back to the Swedish line again with Lindholm and they can simply interchange Hoglander and Mikheyev as needed. Feeling bad for him when he gets a couple games here then there then he's centering Garland, as much as I appreciate the depth by putting him on the 2A line or " 3rd " he should be top six. Oh and cut the shit out with the PP deployment adjustment already haha 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 2 minutes ago, Mike Vanderhoek said: Yeah I would prefer Tocchet goes back to the Swedish line again with Lindholm and they can simply interchange Hoglander and Mikheyev as needed. Feeling bad for him when he gets a couple games here then there then he's centering Garland, as much as I appreciate the depth by putting him on the 2A line or " 3rd " he should be top six. Oh and cut the shit out with the PP deployment adjustment already haha Agreed And yes out the best guy out there. They need to figure it out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoop Hogg Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 I heard Allvin is interested in Makar. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 1 minute ago, Snoop Hogg said: I heard Allvin is interested in Makar. I heard they offered Podkolzin and a second, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoop Hogg Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 Just now, Devron said: I heard they offered Podkolzin and a second, Allvin needs to be more aggressive and up the ante. Raymond, Ballard & 2nd round draft pick. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blitz-Pix Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 15 minutes ago, Devron said: I heard they offered Podkolzin and a second, Uhmmm we can't give up Podz...They can have Aman. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 19 minutes ago, Snoop Hogg said: I heard Allvin is interested in Makar. yea but more like a friend. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ngoway Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 1 hour ago, Shekky said: Has Chris Johnston ever had accurate insider information in regards to the Canucks as of late? As far as I can remember, I don't think so. This very much seems to be like he heard something and just tweeted it out knowing it would garner attention. If you actually think about flipping Elias Lindholm, it makes zero sense. Tocchet has stated he's not concerned with Lindholm's play at all and likes where he's at. If we use the Kuzmenko situation as reference, there were clear indications that he was losing his spot on the team and Tocchet had continually said Kuzmenko was struggling and they were trying to figure it out. Lindholm is exactly one of the pieces the team needs to compete, and if we were going to move on, it'd be in the off season. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TUSK v2.0 Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 Can someone tell me why we are not grabbing this guy? obviously not Frank but the Tony DeAngelo at cheap affordable bench warming RH D Frank Seravalli @frank_seravalli As teams continue to scour the market for right-shot defensemen, sounds like #Canes have set the ask at a 5th round pick for Tony DeAngelo and they will retain 50 percent to make it happen ($837,500). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rekker Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 Just now, VintageActualCanuckfan said: Can someone tell me why we are not grabbing this guy? obviously not Frank but the Tony DeAngelo at cheap affordable bench warming RH D Frank Seravalli @frank_seravalli As teams continue to scour the market for right-shot defensemen, sounds like #Canes have set the ask at a 5th round pick for Tony DeAngelo and they will retain 50 percent to make it happen ($837,500). Google Tony DeAngelo=Wing Nut. May help explain it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 4 minutes ago, VintageActualCanuckfan said: Can someone tell me why we are not grabbing this guy? obviously not Frank but the Tony DeAngelo at cheap affordable bench warming RH D Frank Seravalli @frank_seravalli As teams continue to scour the market for right-shot defensemen, sounds like #Canes have set the ask at a 5th round pick for Tony DeAngelo and they will retain 50 percent to make it happen ($837,500). Racist, ass hat, room cancer that's frankly not that good. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TUSK v2.0 Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 Just now, Rekker said: Google Tony DeAngelo=Wing Nut. May help explain it. Gonchar and Foote specialize in fixing problems. Its like buying an beater car, get it on the road and inspected, its like free money Plus the guy has some production in the past? Just not getting ice time? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrammaInTheTub Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 16 minutes ago, ngoway said: Has Chris Johnston ever had accurate insider information in regards to the Canucks as of late? As far as I can remember, I don't think so. This very much seems to be like he heard something and just tweeted it out knowing it would garner attention. If you actually think about flipping Elias Lindholm, it makes zero sense. Tocchet has stated he's not concerned with Lindholm's play at all and likes where he's at. If we use the Kuzmenko situation as reference, there were clear indications that he was losing his spot on the team and Tocchet had continually said Kuzmenko was struggling and they were trying to figure it out. Lindholm is exactly one of the pieces the team needs to compete, and if we were going to move on, it'd be in the off season. He just reiterated the report on a TSN Sportscentre panel. I doubt he would risk his credibility by tossing this out there without actually hearing anything. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rekker Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 (edited) 4 minutes ago, VintageActualCanuckfan said: Gonchar and Foote specialize in fixing problems. Its like buying an beater car, get it on the road and inspected, its like free money Plus the guy has some production in the past? Just not getting ice time? DeAngelo is the broken, unwanted, leftover Christmas toy with sticky candycane stains on it. Lots of baggage there. Edited March 5 by Rekker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.