Jump to content

[PGT] Let's (not) do a Thing! - Canucks Have Faith in the Current Roster - TDL Friday, Mar 8 @ 12pm PT (or 12:30 if you're Pagnotta)


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, JeremyCuddles said:

I'd rather trade for Zucker than Guentzel. If the cost of Guentzel is even remotely close to any of the speculation. Losing Hogs or Podz for a one way scoring winger. On top of trading out Lindholm. We aren't improving our roster at that point, long term or short term.

 

Zucker would be a good add. He can play wing on top six, is a great skater and can get hot scoring goals. Duclair as well is a player I would be looking at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guentzels age & contract ask make it tough for me to we willing to pay a premium.

 

Perhaps we are better off picking up a guy like Zucker on the cheap, and maybe another depth D. 

 

Zucker - Miller - Boeser

Hoglander - Lindholm - Pettersson

Joshua - Blueger - Garland

Mikheyev - Suter - Lafferty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, canucks curse said:

if they do get guentzel, I could see them trading lindholm seeing as it sounds like he will not resign here cuz he wants 8 mill/yr 

Certainly not worth that kind of money from what I've seen so far. Guentzel would be a good addition!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mike Vanderhoek said:

 

Zucker would be a good add. He can play wing on top six, is a great skater and can get hot scoring goals. Duclair as well is a player I would be looking at.

Duclair is a solid name as well. On a good team he has shown he can produce. Only makes 3mil. I'd take either of them over Guentzel everyday of the week. Just based on Guentzel's potential ask alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Bardown said:

Boston is the perfect spot for Lindholm in a 3 way. Their second line center is Charlie Coyle. 1c is a Zacha and he's only putting up points because he plays with Pasta. Lindholm could literally be their 1c

Maybe it's time I updated my sig...

  • Haha 2
  • ThereItIs 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JeremyCuddles said:

Which is funny cause they already had two separate dealings with us already. Why not complete the hat trick? Smh.

 

Zadorov made it abundantly clear he wanted out, Lindholm too by the sounds of it

 

I read that the Flames actually made a last ditch effort to extend Tanev but things were too far gone

 

More than likely they didn't care if we got Lindholm because they knew his asking price, but they probably would care if we had Tanev if their goal is to compete next season 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hammertime said:

Maybe we over sold them Kuzz. 

They probably just didn't like us returning the favour in taking their players after they took our former players for years:parrot:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...