Canuckfanforlife82 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 3 minutes ago, Kragar said: Avs only played 25 minutes, therefore they deserved to lose more than the Canucks did? I agree that the team's lackluster effort in the third was a big component of the loss. I just think the awful reffing was a bigger factor. It was a factor but that’s adversity for you. You are going to face it in the playoffs. You can’t be soft on pucks. You have to overcome or you will lose a series. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Just now, stawns said: Or they don't look for bogus excuses to explain their poor play. They owned up to it, as they should have It’s the latter. And tonight they are valid concerns now matter how much you plug your ears and stamp your feet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 2 minutes ago, wai_lai416 said: i'm more pissed soucy tried to backhand the puck off the board out of the zone with 8 seconds left instead of just pin it against the board or sit on top of it or something He's been very solid when he's healthy. He's human. And normally he does the smart play. He made a mistake. Learn from it and carry on. I'm more ticked at the Mason penalty, that should have been 5 and a game. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Just now, Canuckfanforlife82 said: It was a factor but that’s adversity for you. You are going to face it in the playoffs. You can’t be soft on pucks. You have to overcome or you will lose a series. So again. They deserved to lose. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Crossbar Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 3 minutes ago, stawns said: The 70's and 80's are over dude, despite the Bon Jovi we hear between whistles. Not true. Simple Minds is our goal song, so ... Hey, hey, hey, hey ... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshua.Guy Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 We wouldn't even be talking about the refs if the Canucks had 1 power play goal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyD Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 5 minutes ago, fanfor42 said: Deb what are you doing? Why do you whine about the refs and diving and the other team? You realize that the Canucks are finally going to the playoffs this year right? Ok so let's get behind the team and support them and get tough. If we geta penalty say good I wish he cracked that mofo's skull. Stop leading the fanbase to be whiners. In 2011 all the whining in the world meant nothing. Toughen up buttercup. Miller is not a whiner so you need to stop being one. I wonder how long your suspension is gonna be for trolling. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Just now, King Heffy said: Intimidation is still a factor in hockey. The team needs to make it clear that either the NHL needs to start forcing the refs to call an honest game or there is no alternative but to seek other solutions. The refs have no right to feel safe when their misconduct is a hazard to player safety. Intimidation is definitely not a factor any more, at all. Neither is fighting and fighting doesn't deter dirty play anyway. If it did, the 70's and 80's would have been the cleanest era in hockey. Instead, it was the opposite of that. It's like saying more guns stops gun violence.......it don't Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Crossbar Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 We have to be so good the refs don't matter. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 1 minute ago, MikeyD said: I wonder how long your suspension is gonna be for trolling. That's not trolling, but I bet he gets banned anyway 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuckfanforlife82 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 (edited) 2 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said: So again. They deserved to lose. Thanks. I will give what you so desperately are seeking: Now you can go to bed knowing your the smartest person on this board. Edited March 14 by Canuckfanforlife82 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Just now, Miss Korea said: There's nothing wrong with reading something you might not necessarily agree with. You can choose to be ignorant to more information and more insight, but that attitude certainly doesn't make your opinion a valid one whatsoever. The article itself calls it an "alternate view". No one in their right mind who has watched the series thinks that Kompalla was calling an honest game, unless you think Team Canada voiced their objections so vigorously for no reason. There's nothing that Kompalla can say that will make me think his conduct was acceptable prior to Parise making him realize that he might have to suffer the consequences. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyD Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 1 minute ago, stawns said: Intimidation is definitely not a factor any more, at all. Neither is fighting and fighting doesn't deter dirty play anyway. If it did, the 70's and 80's would have been the cleanest era in hockey. Instead, it was the opposite of that. It's like saying more guns stops gun violence.......it don't More guns do stop gun violence. You telling me you're gonna fuck with this man?! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 3 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said: It’s the latter. And tonight they are valid concerns now matter how much you plug your ears and stamp your feet. Or look for excuses for giving the game away. Post game interviews said if all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdeath Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 That game produced a lot of video for the Canucks to send the league if we ever face Colorado in the Conference Final. They can have the extra point for that trade honestly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimito Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Korea Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 1 minute ago, King Heffy said: The article itself calls it an "alternate view". No one in their right mind who has watched the series thinks that Kompalla was calling an honest game, unless you think Team Canada voiced their objections so vigorously for no reason. There's nothing that Kompalla can say that will make me think his conduct was acceptable prior to Parise making him realize that he might have to suffer the consequences. Then shame on you for refusing to keep an open mind on things and willing to look at different perspectives. Many Canadians who have read this book and agreed/disagreed with it have nonetheless found it enlightening. But go ahead - choose to be ignorant like I know you always are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 2 minutes ago, Canuckfanforlife82 said: I will give what you so desperately are seeking: Now you can go to bed knowing your the smartest person on this board. It’s ok to admit you were wrong that the team that only played 20 deserves to lose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuckfanforlife82 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 1 minute ago, drdeath said: That game produced a lot of video for the Canucks to send the league if we ever face Colorado in the Conference Final. They can have the extra point for that trade honestly. They haven’t lost once to us this season. They have a ton of points against us this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Korea Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Just now, Jaimito said: LOL look at him go Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyD Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 2 minutes ago, stawns said: That's not trolling, but I bet he gets banned anyway By the very definition it absolutely is... : to antagonize (others) online by deliberately posting inflammatory, irrelevant, or offensive comments or other disruptive content 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Crossbar Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Just now, Jaimito said: Accountability ^^^^^^ 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuckfanforlife82 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Just now, canuck73_3 said: It’s ok to admit you were wrong that the team that only played 20 deserves to lose. No but if you need it to have a good nights rest enjoy that made up idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 1 minute ago, stawns said: Or look for excuses for giving the game away. Post game interviews said if all. You’re naive to think that calling out bullshit refs results in zero backlash. See Auger, Stephane. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_bassi13 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 I've been to two games in person this year, and both times they've blown 3-0 leads. Granted they beat the Leafs in the first game, and they did get a point out of this still. I do have one more match against the Flames I'm going to in 10 days. If the Canucks go up 3-0 again, I'm walking out of Rogers and going home. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.