Popular Post RWMc1 Posted June 29 Popular Post Share Posted June 29 Zadorov has known for several days what other teams are willing to pay him. Arguing about his value doesn't change that fact that he gets the final say. Allvin and co. are sticking to their internal limits. That's the business side of hockey in action. 1 2 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 What if they didn’t re-sign him because they need to free up number 91 for someone… 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris12345 Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 1 minute ago, DeNiro said: What if they didn’t re-sign him because they need to free up number 91 for someone… Drake Caggiula? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 6 minutes ago, chris12345 said: Drake Caggiula? Vitali Kravstov 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 5 minutes ago, chris12345 said: Drake Caggiula? Caggiula is still under contract for this year. Pretty sure he was talking about Anthony Duclair. Duuhhhh. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris12345 Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 5 minutes ago, DeNiro said: Vitali Kravstov Gaetan Haas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris12345 Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 5 minutes ago, MeanSeanBean said: Caggiula is still under contract for this year. Pretty sure he was talking about Anthony Duclair. Duuhhhh. Trade Demko and Hughes for Caggiula. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.AM.THE.WALRUS Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 We need Zad… this completely blows… 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemon Face Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 17 minutes ago, chris12345 said: Trade Demko and Hughes for Caggiula. Who is this Caligula?????? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fanfor42 Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 The timeline on Zadorov's negotiations is interesting. His camp said he was willing to take a discount and wanted to stay in Van. So if he is leaving now what does he expect to get in FA? I think 6M is his ceiling. He may get 6 * 6 or possibly 6 by 7 years somewhere. So was he willing to sign in Van for 5M and it was just the number of years that was the problem? I'd love to know what his ask was and what the Canucks offer was. If he would have signed here for 5M then potentially we sign him and some lesser D for 2M total 7M. Vs. what could be Tanev at 4M and Dillon at 3M for 7 total. I like Tanev and Dillon but they are old and although nice stories and guys who like it here, they will get older fast. Potentially a big mistake by management here to sign the older guys over the younger one - thinking they are being smart. Marino is interesting but he will be expensive to acquire. I think they should have signed Zad at 5M - unless he wanted 6M. (But as I started with, he said he was willing to take a discount). I guess Mngmt has decided he can't sustain his play for the next 5 or 6 years and that is why they are passing. if he plays great for the next 5 or 6 years elsewhere it is a huge mistake by management here. If not, they are right. I guess we will see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Crossbar Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 35 minutes ago, RWMc1 said: Zadorov has known for several days what other teams are willing to pay him. Arguing about his value doesn't change that fact that he gets the final say. Allvin and co. are sticking to their internal limits. That's the business side of hockey in action. Something we actually wanted the previous regime to do ... in being responsible. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwarrior Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 47 minutes ago, DeNiro said: What if they didn’t re-sign him because they need to free up number 91 for someone… Could you be referring to who I think you are? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fanfor42 Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 Just now, gwarrior said: Could you be referring to who I think you are? Or someone else? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwarrior Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 I'm not happy that he's probably leaving. But if he wants 6 million, that's too steep a price tag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 49 minutes ago, DeNiro said: What if they didn’t re-sign him because they need to free up number 91 for someone… That would be inherently stupid. A 34 year old player is not what this team needs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RolexSub Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 2 hours ago, German Canuck said: Over 11M per year? Where does this number come from? That is what people here are talking about in this thread!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chickenspear Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 9 minutes ago, gwarrior said: Could you be referring to who I think you are? Sergei Fedorov? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rip The Mesh Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tas Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 3 minutes ago, PhillipBlunt said: That would be inherently stupid. A 34 year old player is not what this team needs. you think being 34 outweighs being a 40 goal scorer and point per game player last year, a long time team captain and two time stanley cup champion? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 5 minutes ago, tas said: you think being 34 outweighs being a 40 goal scorer and point per game player last year, a long time team captain and two time stanley cup champion? Yes. He won’t be one that moves the needle the way this team needs it moved. Pettersson needs a linemate from his generation, not someone nearly a decade older than him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rip The Mesh Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 2 hours ago, RWJC said: What are you talking about? Does Milstein make him lunches and dress him too? Cmon man THE MONEY ! That's what I meant. Obviously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tas Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 1 minute ago, PhillipBlunt said: Yes. He won’t be one that moves the needle the way this team needs it moved. Pettersson needs a linemate from his generation, not someone nearly a decade older than him. why? doesn't he just need someone who can put the puck in the net? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Kirk Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 6 hours ago, Coryberg said: So we aren't allowed to sign players in free agency? This is the final roster? Darn!!! Sarcasm will get you no where ..... lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 1 minute ago, tas said: why? doesn't he just need someone who can put the puck in the net? That’s his job. He needs linemates who can keep up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwarrior Posted June 29 Share Posted June 29 21 minutes ago, Chickenspear said: Sergei Fedorov? He's WAY to old. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.