Provost Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 It would have been nice to get him, but Milstein over values his clients based on popularity vs. On ice play. His interviews focus on that a lot. Allvin telegraphed it a bit mentioning that they do want to explore if Hronek could carry his own pairing. Hughes-Tanev Soucy-Hronek XX-Myers We need two top four D… or one if we want to promote Soucy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wing Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 1 minute ago, DeNiro said: I do like that. Imagine telling every guy to take a discount and then paying Zadorov 6 mil. Doesn’t make sense. That's a good point. The other guys either took a fair deal or a discount. We handed too many overpaid contracts during the Benning-era. It really sucks to lose Zad, but I trust this management. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WanyeJetski Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 LA kings is my guess for this dude Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rip The Mesh Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 2 minutes ago, German Canuck said: Thats how a great GM group works The words were exactly right. Zads will not be easy to replace, but I'm thinking we now have among the top management teams is the NHL, we'll be good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post HKSR Posted June 28 Popular Post Share Posted June 28 5 minutes ago, Rip The Mesh said: Thank you Allvin for sticking to what you need to do to build a championship team. Overpaying any player takes value away from the team. I have even more respect for Allvin after this non-move. 2 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKSR Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 Trade for Marino... it would make such a difference to how we can build up our D group... check out this cap compliant roster: Suter-Miller-Boeser Hoglander-Petey-Debrusk Joshua-Blueger-Garland PDG-Aman-Karlsson Hughes-Hronek Dillon-Marino Soucy-Myers Yes, it all fits under $88M with a bit of cap to spare. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 1 minute ago, Provost said: It would have been nice to get him, but Milstein over values his clients based on popularity vs. On ice play. His interviews focus on that a lot. Allvin telegraphed it a bit mentioning that they do want to explore if Hronek could carry his own pairing. Hughes-Tanev Soucy-Hronek XX-Myers We need two top four D… or one if we want to promote Soucy Not necessarily. We flew out of the gate to a 12-3-1 record with Soucy-Myers as our second pair. We'd still do well to add one more guy (Tanev?) though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rekker Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 2 minutes ago, HKSR said: Thank you Allvin for sticking to what you need to do to build a championship team. Overpaying any player takes value away from the team. I have even more respect for Allvin after this non-move. Hurts, but it is refreshing to have a management group with a vision and plan. JB was just ffnn scattered. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicken. Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 1 minute ago, HKSR said: Trade for Marino... it would make such a difference to how we can build up our D group... check out this cap compliant roster: Suter-Miller-Boeser Hoglander-Petey-Debrusk Joshua-Blueger-Garland PDG-Aman-Karlsson Hughes-Hronek Dillon-Marino Soucy-Myers Yes, it all fits under $88M with a bit of cap to spare. no Stamkos ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 There’s no argument for the stuff we traded away to watch players walk, absolute bullshit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RupertKBD Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 Well, this is disappointing..... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DexM94 Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 1 minute ago, HKSR said: Trade for Marino... it would make such a difference to how we can build up our D group... check out this cap compliant roster: Suter-Miller-Boeser Hoglander-Petey-Debrusk Joshua-Blueger-Garland PDG-Aman-Karlsson Hughes-Hronek Dillon-Marino Soucy-Myers Yes, it all fits under $88M with a bit of cap to spare. Suter still on the first line after a complete offseason ? no thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post NoHeart Posted June 28 Popular Post Share Posted June 28 It’s a left shot 3rd pair Dman. Relax 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DexM94 Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 10 minutes ago, Rip The Mesh said: imagine if he signs for 5.5 elsewhere. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Dr. Crossbar Posted June 28 Popular Post Share Posted June 28 1 minute ago, HKSR said: Thank you Allvin for sticking to what you need to do to build a championship team. Overpaying any player takes value away from the team. I have even more respect for Allvin after this non-move. Exactly. Fans can't scream, cry, and complain about overpayments and then at the same time demand guys be overpaid. That's irresponsible. Tough calls need to be made. Has to be middle ground and make sense financially. As hard as it is to see Zad go, we're fortunate to have this management group. 2 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKSR Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 1 minute ago, Chicken. said: no Stamkos ? We could if we backed off of Marino or Dillon... Hoglander-Petey-Stamkos Suter-Miller-Boeser Joshua-Blueger-Garland Podkolzin-Aman-Karlsson Hughes-Hronek Soucy-Myers Dillon-Juulsen 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wheres Wellwood Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 If Zadorov was a RHD, he'd have been re-signed, no question. But as a LHD, Hughes and Soucy are above him. We got Soucy for under 4M as a UFA. We can find a 3LD for less than that 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 2 minutes ago, Devron said: There’s no argument for the stuff we traded away to watch players walk, absolute bullshit It was a 2027 2nd to help bring Joshua back. Big fucking deal. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 Just now, Pears said: It was a 2027 2nd to help bring Joshua back. Big fucking deal. Nothing wrong with that deal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
German Canuck Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 2 minutes ago, Devron said: There’s no argument for the stuff we traded away to watch players walk, absolute bullshit Cool down thats part of the game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJC Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 No this isn’t me right now 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 10 minutes ago, DeNiro said: I do like that. Imagine telling every guy to take a discount and then paying Zadorov 6 mil. Doesn’t make sense. Bingo, sending the right message matters 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conscience Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 Damn sucks, the little overpayments on other players really adds up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 Trading for Marino will cost us a fair bit. Zads leaving allows GMs to know that we now need a premium asset at a premium position and that won't be cheap. Marino will be multiple picks or a middling pick and a young player. Who are we giving up for Marino? Hogs? For an RHD (big need but less than last year) that is middle of the road across the board. Hesitant to start seeing this management group start dumping assets to fill holes every year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKSR Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 1 minute ago, DexM94 said: Suter still on the first line after a complete offseason ? no thanks Honestly, I look at the lines in terms of production as a whole... Suter was only on a 35 point pace, but the duo of Miller-Boeser sees a huge increase in CF and FF% when Suter is on that line. It produces better with him on it than when he's not. Suter-Miller-Boeser = 200ish points combined Hoglander-Petey-??? = 180 to 200 points combined Joshua-Blueger-Garland = 120 points combined Now if Petey got a legit top 6F ... say a Stamkos or Guentzel... Hoglander-Petey-Stamkos = 220 points combined Suter-Miller-Boeser = 200 points combined Joshua-Blueger-Garland = 120 points combined Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.