stawns Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 1 minute ago, Rip The Mesh said: This, at first glance might seem gloomy. / I take it as he's close !! So who starts, DeSmith or Silovs. My money is on CD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKSR Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 Just now, stawns said: So who starts, DeSmith or Silovs. My money is on CD Silovs 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bob Long Posted May 5 Popular Post Share Posted May 5 So "Dom" from the Athletic says his model gives the Canucks a 26% chance. He was wrong about us sweeping the Oily's in the regular season. He was wrong about us winning the Pacific. He was wrong about us beating Nashville. 2 4 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
testycal Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 The team is learning what it takes to win.....Mr. Tocchet has been preaching what it takes to win from December onwards but until the team is actually experiencing it, they could not internalize. They are now internalizing that and they are starting to connect the dots of what it actually takes. I am not stating this so that we can feel good about making it this far as sometimes raw energy and being naïve is preferred....not always the tried and true takes the day. Rough around the edges has its benefits sometimes and I am excited to see how this series plays out. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rip The Mesh Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-dlc- Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 5 minutes ago, Elias Pettersson said: Thing is, he's often more a liability than an asset. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-dlc- Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 2 minutes ago, Bob Long said: So "Dom" from the Athletic says his model gives the Canucks a 26% chance. He was wrong about us sweeping the Oily's in the regular season. He was wrong about us winning the Pacific. He was wrong about us beating Nashville. Three strikes you're out. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kettlevalley Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 We gotta play Silovs while he is playing this well and Demko is hurt. Desmith isn't bad but Silovs is way closer to Demko. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Future Considerations Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 12 minutes ago, Grinch said: Petterson needs to stay in his feet, every shift he goes down too easy - you can tell he is trying to sell a penalty that may come back to bite him in the ass Pettersson is light on his feet and this is what makes him so fast and elusive. Don't be a grinch and take away Petey's magic. Petey, do your dekes! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elias Pettersson Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 1 minute ago, -dlc- said: Thing is, he's often more a liability than an asset. True, but he's the perfect guy to have on the ice if you want to "run" McDavid. Losing Reaves would actually make your team stronger not weaker... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darius Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 7 minutes ago, Bob Long said: So "Dom" from the Athletic says his model gives the Canucks a 26% chance. He was wrong about us sweeping the Oily's in the regular season. He was wrong about us winning the Pacific. He was wrong about us beating Nashville. Wasn’t he the guy that categorized QH as a tier 3b defenceman at the start of the year? Don’t know how some of these ‘analytics’ guys have seemingly replaced legit sports journalists. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Crossbar Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 9 minutes ago, HKSR said: Silovs Run with the hot hand. It would also be a good test to see how he does against EDM out of the gate. Although DeSmith has the experience from his most recent showing against the Oilers. Albeit McDavidless. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck You Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 Look at these losers! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Crossbar Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 10 minutes ago, Bob Long said: So "Dom" from the Athletic says his model gives the Canucks a 26% chance. He was wrong about us sweeping the Oily's in the regular season. He was wrong about us winning the Pacific. He was wrong about us beating Nashville. He'll be wrong again. It's been happening all season. Yet people keep doubling down on the wrong side of the fence. We're better on D, deeper in net, better bottom forward depth, can forecheck heavy, have better size ... we need to contain the Oilers Top 6 and PP. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 10 minutes ago, -dlc- said: Thing is, he's often more a liability than an asset. he's so done. I'm surprised they played him at all vs Boston tbh, just useless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe King Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 37 minutes ago, spook007 said: F that.... then put a nobody with size to take out McD, and get a major + suspension. If the cards aren't dealt fairly, you make your own luck. Thing is teams shouldn't have to make adjustments according to how the officials are deciding to call a game. In other trades if you suck at your job your gone. There needs to be consistency. The stripes shouldn't be the stars of the show. And it should be regular season and play offs. It can be frustrating. As soon as my team bows out so do I. To many inconsistencies for me to put up with, for me to want to support anything other than the team I love 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 1 minute ago, Canuck You said: Look at these losers! oh Ray, how could you. Fredo!!!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 4 minutes ago, Darius said: Wasn’t he the guy that categorized QH as a tier 3b defenceman at the start of the year? Don’t know how some of these ‘analytics’ guys have seemingly replaced legit sports journalists. yes thats him. His whole shtick is "expected goals". Well, I expect JT will have his way with Nugget-Hophead. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 5 minutes ago, Bob Long said: oh Ray, how could you. Fredo!!!! Ferraro is an assclown 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 Just now, PhillipBlunt said: Ferraro is an assclown I'd like to hear him explain it to Cammi. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Bob Long said: I'd like to hear him explain it to Cammi. Ray is going to suffer. Edited May 5 by PhillipBlunt 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rip The Mesh Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks curse Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 any update on when game 1 will be ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Crossbar Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 Just now, canucks curse said: any update on when game 1 will be ? Tuesday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Darius Posted May 5 Popular Post Share Posted May 5 Media Predictions mean Jack squat 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.