old guy Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 (edited) 17 hours ago, Bob Long said: it did show us Podkolzin is ready. You can't just bark about your downside view of things. Amen, lemonade! Edited March 19 by old guy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ploughcat07 Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 2 hours ago, AnotherCanucksFan said: Yeah kind of pissed at Joshua for fighting when he's become far more valuable to the team. Frustrating to lose a great character player....but that's why he fought. He was protecting Garland because he's a great character player. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 2 hours ago, old guy said: Amen, lemonade! its true. You really have to look at the +'s of things like injuries, its how you find your next gem. Podz may in fact have to take over for Joshua, if he's pricing himself out of the market for us as a UFA. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnotherCanucksFan Posted March 20 Share Posted March 20 4 hours ago, ploughcat07 said: Frustrating to lose a great character player....but that's why he fought. He was protecting Garland because he's a great character player. I understand why, but I think Joshua can't play the role of the enforcer and be scorer / checker that he was on the line. I think it was shortsighted and really upset the team chemistry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnotherCanucksFan Posted March 20 Share Posted March 20 Winnipeg showing how you hold onto a lead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted March 21 Share Posted March 21 On 3/19/2024 at 12:43 PM, ploughcat07 said: Frustrating to lose a great character player....but that's why he fought. He was protecting Garland because he's a great character player. Sorry, that juice is not worth the squeeze. They had a great thing going and, not only do you lose him long term, there's a good chance that chemistry could be gone too. Over something silly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted March 21 Share Posted March 21 10 minutes ago, stawns said: Sorry, that juice is not worth the squeeze. They had a great thing going and, not only do you lose him long term, there's a good chance that chemistry could be gone too. Over something silly Why would the chemistry be gone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted March 21 Share Posted March 21 19 minutes ago, Bob Long said: Why would the chemistry be gone? Chemistry is fickle thing and when you've got it and lose it, it's hard to get back. That's the main part of a coach's job, looking for chemistry and that's why they switch lines so much..........I'm not saying they can't get it back, but that's a long time for that line to be separated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted March 21 Share Posted March 21 55 minutes ago, stawns said: Chemistry is fickle thing and when you've got it and lose it, it's hard to get back. That's the main part of a coach's job, looking for chemistry and that's why they switch lines so much..........I'm not saying they can't get it back, but that's a long time for that line to be separated I might be concerned if we were talking about more offensive player chemistry, but the foundations of each player are based on less finesse. I'd be pretty surprised if the got back together on that line and sucked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted March 21 Share Posted March 21 (edited) Edited March 21 by elvis15 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted March 21 Share Posted March 21 Lindholm came broken? Shucks. Load manage him one of these games too. I don't care where win finishes in the standings as long as we're as close to healthy as possible when playoffs roll around. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanuckMan Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 Nice to have the D depth that we can actually load manage. When has that ever been possible in the last 10 years. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldFaithfulcap Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 (edited) Lindholm not at sunday practice Joshua in non-contact Edited March 24 by OldFaithfulcap Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 And photo evidence: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 Anyone have info on Lindy's injury woes? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 (edited) They're keeping pretty tight lipped so far. Edited March 24 by elvis15 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 22 minutes ago, elvis15 said: They're keeping pretty tight lipped so far. Tight lipped, on this, and basically every injury. I was hoping having so many gambling 'partners' would force the league/teams to be way more open about injuries and timelines. I am wondering if Lindy was damaged goods before the trade, and if so, did Calgary know and did the Canucks know? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinatcc Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 On 3/22/2024 at 12:52 AM, JeremyCuddles said: Lindholm came broken? Shucks. Load manage him one of these games too. I don't care where win finishes in the standings as long as we're as close to healthy as possible when playoffs roll around. Makes you wonder if Flames management knew something was bothering him. If so Canucks might have gotten played by the Flames Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 39 minutes ago, iinatcc said: Makes you wonder if Flames management knew something was bothering him. If so Canucks might have gotten played by the Flames I would be shocked if they didn't know. But I mean, we had the chance to offload him on Boston at the TDL. So potentially we didn't know, meaning the Flames might not have, or they knew and we somehow didn't even as late as the TDL. Really hoping the 2nd option isn't true but we'll never truly know unless for some reason Conroy admits they knew he was damaged. Which he'd have no reason to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks curse Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 3 hours ago, Gurn said: Anyone have info on Lindy's injury woes? 650 said upper body and that it is affecting his shooting, they said a one of his slap shots was clocked at 68.2...from a few games ago 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted March 25 Share Posted March 25 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 (edited) Edited March 26 by elvis15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 2 hours ago, elvis15 said: When he says shutting him down does he mean for the season? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 When you're talking about 10 games left in the season, shutting someone down to heal an injury isn't quite as ominous. Take it how you like at this point. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 45 minutes ago, elvis15 said: When you're talking about 10 games left in the season, shutting someone down to heal an injury isn't quite as ominous. Take it how you like at this point. I mean that’s 3 weeks and it would mean he doesn’t get any games to ramp it up before playoffs. It would indicate it’s more than just a minor injury too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.