King Heffy Posted Monday at 05:27 PM Share Posted Monday at 05:27 PM 3 minutes ago, Cranston said: An author's opinion. Noted. Yes, I was looking for the purest factual info in answer to a posters request. I note author opinion in the text, but understand it will be full of half truth and omission. I guess the real issue is how many migrants cross and are now resident in the US on the gov't tit between administrations. Surely it's a total Biden blowout. This last part I already replied to. A tweet that agrees with me lol? The border patrol is endorsing Trump. It doesn't get any worse for your position than that. Internet phrases? What are you referring too?Anyway, maybe you wanted me to address the first part of your previous post so I brought it back up. My thought on concerns outlined in this vague concerns in this article are...Do your jobs and quit playing politics. I doubt this is anything but a bomb threat style hoax (from either side of the aisle) and aid workers should be willing to accept risk like this during disaster relief. You think domestic terrorism is an acceptable risk during a disaster. Wow. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Warhippy Posted Monday at 05:31 PM Popular Post Share Posted Monday at 05:31 PM 1 hour ago, SilentSam said: 1 hour ago, SilentSam said: Now in fairness I don't like Trump at all. I like his supporters even less. But I never actually liked the comparisons to Hitler because they seemed like insane fear mongering. Now Trump is demanding military support on his campaign. he is threatening the enemy within. he is calling immigrants animals and genetically inferior and if that isn't DIRECTLY the same play list that an individual from Austira committed to in Germany from 1924 through 1935 before all hell broke loose than people are absolutely not reading their history books. 2 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted Monday at 05:35 PM Share Posted Monday at 05:35 PM (edited) 12 minutes ago, Cranston said: An author's opinion. Noted. Yes, I was looking for the purest factual info in answer to a posters request. I note author opinion in the text, but understand it will be full of half truth and omission. I guess the real issue is how many migrants cross and are now resident in the US on the gov't tit between administrations. Surely it's a total Biden blowout. This last part I already replied to. A tweet that agrees with me lol? The border patrol is endorsing Trump. It doesn't get any worse for your position than that. Internet phrases? What are you referring too?Anyway, maybe you wanted me to address the first part of your previous post so I brought it back up. My thought on concerns outlined in this vague concerns in this article are...Do your jobs and quit playing politics. I doubt this is anything but a bomb threat style hoax (from either side of the aisle) and aid workers should be willing to accept risk like this during disaster relief. Not 15 hours before they endorsed him trump held a meeting with the border patrol council promising to increase pay and hire 10,000 new border agents after sinking the bi-partisan border bill which would have done essentially the same. it's almost as if. Maybe just maybe, this isn't actually adding up properly. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-pitches-plan-hire-border-agents-opposing-bipartisan-bill-rcna175216 Former President Donald Trump said Sunday that if elected he would ask Congress to pass legislation boosting the number of border patrol agents — several months after he thwarted a bipartisan measure that included staffing increases. The proposal would include the hiring of 10,000 new agents and a 10% raise for existing agents, as well as $10,000 for retention and signing bonuses, a Trump senior adviser said. “I will be asking Congress immediately to approve a 10% raise,” Trump said at a campaign rally in Prescott Valley, Arizona. "We have a tremendous shortage because they haven’t been treated right." U.S. Customs and Border Protection did not immediately respond to requests for comment Sunday. Edited Monday at 05:36 PM by Warhippy 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted Monday at 05:44 PM Share Posted Monday at 05:44 PM 2 minutes ago, Cranston said: An author's opinion. Noted. Yes, I was looking for the purest factual info in answer to a posters request. I note author opinion in the text, but understand it will be full of half truth and omission. I guess the real issue is how many migrants cross and are now resident in the US on the gov't tit between administrations. Surely it's a total Biden blowout. This last part I already replied to. A tweet that agrees with me lol? The border patrol is endorsing Trump. It doesn't get any worse for your position than that. Internet phrases? What are you referring too?Anyway, maybe you wanted me to address the first part of your previous post so I brought it back up. My thought on concerns outlined in this vague concerns in this article are...Do your jobs and quit playing politics. I doubt this is anything but a bomb threat style hoax (from either side of the aisle) and aid workers should be willing to accept risk like this during disaster relief. I get it now. Democrats can do no good. Republicans can do no wrong. There is a pre-packaged response to any argument that says otherwise. I'm going to just focus on these statements for now: My thought on concerns outlined in this vague concerns in this article are...Do your jobs and quit playing politics. I doubt this is anything but a bomb threat style hoax (from either side of the aisle) and aid workers should be willing to accept risk like this during disaster relief. I'll ignore the first incomprehensible sentence. You are implying that either side could have done this. Like in Springfield? Those bomb threats to the city hall and schools were just as likely from the left as the right? Can you list the recent bomb threats that most likely came from the left? You are implying that it was the left played politics by voicing out and out lies concerning the work done by the White house and FEMA to come to people's aid? And these new bomb threats are no biggie? Just the cost of doing business? That the aid workers have not already willingly faced risk of personal harm as they worked to rescue people? That the acceptable risks to hurricane relief should be flood waters, falling structures as they search for survivors, AND bomb threats? As I read and re-read that closing statement I am still left with the question: WTF are you talking about? 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Arrogant Worms Posted Monday at 08:09 PM Share Posted Monday at 08:09 PM Trump Calls On Kamala Harris to ‘Pass a Test on Cognitive Stamina and Agility’ — Despite Not Releasing His Own Medical Records https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-calls-on-kamala-harris-to-pass-a-test-on-cognitive-stamina-and-agility-despite-not-releasing-his-own-medical-records/ 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Arrogant Worms Posted Monday at 08:13 PM Share Posted Monday at 08:13 PM 68 Percent of Economists Surveyed By Wall Street Journal Deem Trump Worse For Inflation Than Harris https://www.mediaite.com/election-2024/nearly-7-out-of-10-economists-surveyed-by-wall-street-journal-deem-trump-worse-for-inflation-than-harris/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted Monday at 09:00 PM Share Posted Monday at 09:00 PM 50 minutes ago, The Arrogant Worms said: Trump Calls On Kamala Harris to ‘Pass a Test on Cognitive Stamina and Agility’ — Despite Not Releasing His Own Medical Records https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-calls-on-kamala-harris-to-pass-a-test-on-cognitive-stamina-and-agility-despite-not-releasing-his-own-medical-records/ So.... Fat Orange Dumpy Lying Waste Tv Camera Like that? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24K Posted Monday at 09:35 PM Share Posted Monday at 09:35 PM (edited) 2 hours ago, The Arrogant Worms said: 68 Percent of Economists Surveyed By Wall Street Journal Deem Trump Worse For Inflation Than Harris https://www.mediaite.com/election-2024/nearly-7-out-of-10-economists-surveyed-by-wall-street-journal-deem-trump-worse-for-inflation-than-harris/ I question the credentials of the other 32. Edited Monday at 10:46 PM by 24K 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bishopshodan Posted Monday at 10:19 PM Share Posted Monday at 10:19 PM Kamala Harris Rolls Out National Marijuana Legalization Plan, Pledging To Make It ‘The Law Of The Land’ https://www.marijuanamoment.net/kamala-harris-rolls-out-marijuana-legalization-plan-pledging-to-make-it-the-law-of-the-land/ This should help her get the jorb. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Duodenum Posted Monday at 10:25 PM Popular Post Share Posted Monday at 10:25 PM I don't know if this is funnier or the fact that @bolt is sitting around waiting for this news from a random nobody twitter user. 1 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistolPete13 Posted Monday at 10:29 PM Share Posted Monday at 10:29 PM 4 hours ago, Satchmo said: I get it now. Democrats can do no good. Republicans can do no wrong. There is a pre-packaged response to any argument that says otherwise. I'm going to just focus on these statements for now: My thought on concerns outlined in this vague concerns in this article are...Do your jobs and quit playing politics. I doubt this is anything but a bomb threat style hoax (from either side of the aisle) and aid workers should be willing to accept risk like this during disaster relief. I'll ignore the first incomprehensible sentence. You are implying that either side could have done this. Like in Springfield? Those bomb threats to the city hall and schools were just as likely from the left as the right? Can you list the recent bomb threats that most likely came from the left? You are implying that it was the left played politics by voicing out and out lies concerning the work done by the White house and FEMA to come to people's aid? And these new bomb threats are no biggie? Just the cost of doing business? That the aid workers have not already willingly faced risk of personal harm as they worked to rescue people? That the acceptable risks to hurricane relief should be flood waters, falling structures as they search for survivors, AND bomb threats? As I read and re-read that closing statement I am still left with the question: WTF are you talking about? By gum, I think you have the right of it. He was just following dear leader’s orders. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4petesake Posted Monday at 10:48 PM Share Posted Monday at 10:48 PM 5 hours ago, Satchmo said: I'm going to just focus on these statements for now: My thought on concerns outlined in this vague concerns in this article are...Do your jobs and quit playing politics. I doubt this is anything but a bomb threat style hoax (from either side of the aisle) and aid workers should be willing to accept risk like this during disaster relief. I'll ignore the first incomprehensible sentence. You are implying that either side could have done this. Like in Springfield? Those bomb threats to the city hall and schools were just as likely from the left as the right? Can you list the recent bomb threats that most likely came from the left? You are implying that it was the left played politics by voicing out and out lies concerning the work done by the White house and FEMA to come to people's aid? And these new bomb threats are no biggie? Just the cost of doing business? That the aid workers have not already willingly faced risk of personal harm as they worked to rescue people? That the acceptable risks to hurricane relief should be flood waters, falling structures as they search for survivors, AND bomb threats? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RupertKBD Posted Monday at 10:51 PM Share Posted Monday at 10:51 PM 30 minutes ago, bishopshodan said: Kamala Harris Rolls Out National Marijuana Legalization Plan, Pledging To Make It ‘The Law Of The Land’ https://www.marijuanamoment.net/kamala-harris-rolls-out-marijuana-legalization-plan-pledging-to-make-it-the-law-of-the-land/ This should help her get the jorb. It should definitely get her the snowboarder vote.... Pretty sure she already had Bill Maher and Willie Nelson.... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted Monday at 10:51 PM Share Posted Monday at 10:51 PM 31 minutes ago, bishopshodan said: Kamala Harris Rolls Out National Marijuana Legalization Plan, Pledging To Make It ‘The Law Of The Land’ https://www.marijuanamoment.net/kamala-harris-rolls-out-marijuana-legalization-plan-pledging-to-make-it-the-law-of-the-land/ This should help her get the jorb. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted Monday at 11:01 PM Share Posted Monday at 11:01 PM 10 minutes ago, 4petesake said: But... 'aid workers should be willing to accept risk like his during disaster relief.' 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bishopshodan Posted Monday at 11:02 PM Share Posted Monday at 11:02 PM (edited) 37 minutes ago, RupertKBD said: It should definitely get her the snowboarder vote.... Pretty sure she already had Bill Maher and Willie Nelson.... It could be bigger than people realise. When JT did it, 70% of Canadians were in support of the move. It was a big reason the Libs got my vote that year. JT promised legalisation and electoral reform. I wanted both, he failed on ER obviously but it is cool that people that consume a drug way less harmful than Alc dont have to be considered criminals anymore. I will likely be buying some pot stocks tmr. Edit: Found this. 68% support in the states for legalisation. https://news.gallup.com/poll/405086/marijuana-views-linked-ideology-religiosity-age.aspx Yep, good move Harris. Edited Monday at 11:30 PM by bishopshodan 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cranston Posted Tuesday at 12:19 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 12:19 AM 6 hours ago, King Heffy said: You think domestic terrorism is an acceptable risk during a disaster. Wow. If someone calls in a bomb threat and I'm sitting in school I leave. If someone calls in a bomb threat and I'm busy saving people, I ignore it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cranston Posted Tuesday at 12:29 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 12:29 AM 6 hours ago, Satchmo said: I get it now. Democrats can do no good. Republicans can do no wrong. There is a pre-packaged response to any argument that says otherwise. SPR release was good. 6 hours ago, Satchmo said: I'm going to just focus on these statements for now: My thought on concerns outlined in this vague concerns in this article are...Do your jobs and quit playing politics. I doubt this is anything but a bomb threat style hoax (from either side of the aisle) and aid workers should be willing to accept risk like this during disaster relief. I'll ignore the first incomprehensible sentence. But you didn't ignore it did you? 6 hours ago, Satchmo said: You are implying that either side could have done this. Like in Springfield? Those bomb threats to the city hall and schools were just as likely from the left as the right? Can you list the recent bomb threats that most likely came from the left? You are implying that it was the left played politics by voicing out and out lies concerning the work done by the White house and FEMA to come to people's aid? And these new bomb threats are no biggie? Just the cost of doing business? That the aid workers have not already willingly faced risk of personal harm as they worked to rescue people? That the acceptable risks to hurricane relief should be flood waters, falling structures as they search for survivors, AND bomb threats? As I read and re-read that closing statement I am still left with the question: WTF are you talking about? I will ignore the bolded and don't know what's difficult to understand about the last statement one but here's help. If I'm sitting in a schoolroom I leave when there's a bomb threat. If I'm busy saving lives and there's a bomb threat, I ignore it. 6 hours ago, Satchmo said: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bolt Posted Tuesday at 12:59 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 12:59 AM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted Tuesday at 01:00 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 01:00 AM 17 minutes ago, Cranston said: SPR release was good. But you didn't ignore it did you? I will ignore the bolded and don't know what's difficult to understand about the last statement one but here's help. If I'm sitting in a schoolroom I leave when there's a bomb threat. If I'm busy saving lives and there's a bomb threat, I ignore it. ok. I think it was more unavoidable than good. Yes, I did. The bolded bit referred to your statement 'Do your jobs and quit playing politics'. Is having a rational fear of being blown up a way of playing politics? Now we know how you would react to a bomb threat. That's up to you. If you haven't noticed, what I and others have commented on is how you are belittling the presence of bomb threats, and refusing to see the connection between Trump's lies concerning FEMA and the bomb threats to FEMA. As far as I know, FEMA has no history of bomb threats. Trump uses FEMA as a means to discredit his political opponent and voila! Bomb threats and armed thugs. Now that's playing politics. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duodenum Posted Tuesday at 01:03 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 01:03 AM How it feels trying to get Republicans to understand something. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted Tuesday at 01:03 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 01:03 AM 1 minute ago, bolt said: Because its bullshit and not a good description of what's actually going on. Now, investigate the nonsense that Republicans are doing in Georgia. That should be the biggest story in America right now. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted Tuesday at 01:22 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 01:22 AM 16 minutes ago, Satchmo said: Because its bullshit and not a good description of what's actually going on. Now, investigate the nonsense that Republicans are doing in Georgia. That should be the biggest story in America right now. Trump is a lying sick fat ass. What are the recent ones he’s encouraging? The Dems are letting people in who are eating pets. Waltz is gay. It’s crazy shat Trump supports. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistolPete13 Posted Tuesday at 01:38 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 01:38 AM 35 minutes ago, bolt said: Youngkin serving up nothing burgers. Can’t explain why Repubs didn’t correct the “problem” went they had the chance under Bush and under Dolt 45. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Gurn Posted Tuesday at 01:44 AM Popular Post Share Posted Tuesday at 01:44 AM 38 minutes ago, Duodenum said: How it feels trying to get Republicans to understand something. What a MORON 10 million people coming over the border every day. 10 mil x 365 =three Billion six hundred and fifty million people a year. DA FUQ 2 1 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.