Popular Post Playoff Beered Posted September 28, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted September 28, 2023 1 minute ago, BlockerHigh said: Examining both sides of the argument is very important, it seems from your post you’re only getting what the main stream media wants you to see. 1 1 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the destroyer of worlds Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 2 minutes ago, BlockerHigh said: Evidence bank records Emails texts WhatsApp messages biden was on 20 calls with this son and his business partners irs whistleblower testimony business partner testimony and now this I would posit the idea of “no evidence” is clearly something the media wants you to believe and not the truth. I would suggest following the House Judiciary GOP and Kevin McCarthy on Twitter so see what you are not being informed of. Examining both sides of the argument is very important, it seems from your post you’re only getting what the main stream media wants you to see. From the very article that is in the tweet. Kinda disspells the myth that these were payments to Joe, and just payments to Hunter. Again, from the very article: The first wire transfer sent to Hunter Biden, dated July 26, 2019, was for $10,000 from an individual named Ms. Wang Xin. There is a Ms. Wang Xin listed on the website for BHR Partners. It is unclear if the wire came from that Wang Xin. The second wire transfer sent to Hunter Biden, dated Aug. 2, 2019, was for $250,000 from Li Xiang Sheng — also known as Jonathan Li, the CEO of BHR Partners — and Ms. Tan Ling. The committee is trying to identify Ling’s role. The beneficiary for the wires is listed as Robert Hunter Biden with the address "1209 Barley Mill Rd." in Wilmington, Delaware. That address is the main residence for President Biden. And Hunter Biden spent time in 2017, 2018 and 2019 living at the Biden family home in Wilmington. It is unclear if he was living at the home at the time of the wire transfers in July and August 2019. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlockerHigh Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 (edited) 3 minutes ago, the destroyer of worlds said: From the very article that is in the tweet. Kinda disspells the myth that these were payments to Joe, and just payments to Hunter. Again, from the very article: The first wire transfer sent to Hunter Biden, dated July 26, 2019, was for $10,000 from an individual named Ms. Wang Xin. There is a Ms. Wang Xin listed on the website for BHR Partners. It is unclear if the wire came from that Wang Xin. The second wire transfer sent to Hunter Biden, dated Aug. 2, 2019, was for $250,000 from Li Xiang Sheng — also known as Jonathan Li, the CEO of BHR Partners — and Ms. Tan Ling. The committee is trying to identify Ling’s role. The beneficiary for the wires is listed as Robert Hunter Biden with the address "1209 Barley Mill Rd." in Wilmington, Delaware. That address is the main residence for President Biden. And Hunter Biden spent time in 2017, 2018 and 2019 living at the Biden family home in Wilmington. It is unclear if he was living at the home at the time of the wire transfers in July and August 2019. You do know Jonathan Li is a known top level Chinese Spy right? you do know Hunter’s emails explain he is supposed to give 10% to the big guy, his business partners testified and have emails stating the Big guy is Joe, and finally that Hunter was selling the “brand” and the brand is clearly access. I suggest following the twitter accounts I mentioned, as I cannot go through it ALL here, and digging through those twitter accounts will. Edited September 28, 2023 by BlockerHigh 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RupertKBD Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 10 minutes ago, BlockerHigh said: Evidence bank records Emails texts WhatsApp messages biden was on 20 calls with this son and his business partners irs whistleblower testimony business partner testimony and now this I would posit the idea of “no evidence” is clearly something the media wants you to believe and not the truth. I would suggest following the House Judiciary GOP and Kevin McCarthy on Twitter to see what you are not being informed of. Examining both sides of the argument is very important, it seems from your post you’re only getting what the main stream media wants you to see. You can then also compare what you read and see there Vs how the media “spins” it… and then assess for yourself. trump was impeached for uncovering Biden’s corruption in Ukraine. I for one find that disturbing. But then again; the govt has a history of going after people who expose it. Assange, Snowden, etc. Soooo....you're posting a tweet from "House Republicans" as your evidence. There is none. This inquiry will amount to nothing, but Repugs don't care. The real goal is to go through the motions to appease Trump and to cause doubt in the minds of gullible fools. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 1 hour ago, Rob Eh said: I watched that live, every single person there was looking at here, like. WTF is wrong with her? The next guy pointed out they were debating 1786 not the absurdities of 2020 twitter. That person is unfit for her position. Of course someone did. But everything she did say had every level of bearing on an impeachment inquiry without evidence, without witnesses and without credibility when brought to the stage by people IGNORING that the evidence of the impeachment prior to this existed against the former president and they intentionally ignored it and called it a witch hunt 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 16 minutes ago, BlockerHigh said: Evidence bank records Emails texts WhatsApp messages biden was on 20 calls with this son and his business partners irs whistleblower testimony business partner testimony and now this I would posit the idea of “no evidence” is clearly something the media wants you to believe and not the truth. I would suggest following the House Judiciary GOP and Kevin McCarthy on Twitter to see what you are not being informed of. Examining both sides of the argument is very important, it seems from your post you’re only getting what the main stream media wants you to see. You can then also compare what you read and see there Vs how the media “spins” it… and then assess for yourself. trump was impeached for uncovering Biden’s corruption in Ukraine. I for one find that disturbing. But then again; the govt has a history of going after people who expose it. Assange, Snowden, etc. Which tiume was that? trump being impeached I mean? Your evidence, by the way thus far by the existing "witnesses" and the existing experts does not constitute any level of wrong doing on the current US presidents behalf, nor does it engender enough of a worry to warrant an actual impeachment trial. Whereas in comparison, trump was impeached twice on evidence that existed based on actions he committed to. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlockerHigh Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 4 minutes ago, RupertKBD said: Soooo....you're posting a tweet from "House Republicans" as your evidence. There is none. This inquiry will amount to nothing, but Repugs don't care. The real goal is to go through the motions to appease Trump and to cause doubt in the minds of gullible fools. So you expect the democrats to actually impeach their own? as I said, go comb through the 2 twitter accounts I mentioned and you can see some of the text messages, irs whistleblower testimony, and much of th evidence again, choosing to ignore it is, your choice. I prefer to look at facts before I make a decision / form an opinion on anything in life cheers 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Playoff Beered Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 5 minutes ago, RupertKBD said: Soooo....you're posting a tweet from "House Republicans" as your evidence. There is none. This inquiry will amount to nothing, but Repugs don't care. The real goal is to go through the motions to appease Trump and to cause doubt in the minds of gullible fools. Ya gotta admit though, it seems to be working, yeah? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24K Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 1 minute ago, Playoff Beered said: Ya gotta admit though, it seems to be working, yeah? Ofcourse it is working. US is made up of gullible fools. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Playoff Beered Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 2 minutes ago, BlockerHigh said: So you expect the democrats to actually impeach their own? as I said, go comb through the 2 twitter accounts I mentioned and you can see some of the text messages, irs whistleblower testimony, and much of th evidence again, choosing to ignore it is, your choice. I prefer to look at facts before I make a decision / form an opinion on anything in life cheers If it was credible, yes they would. they're not spineless cowards like the MAGA republicans. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24K Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 6 minutes ago, BlockerHigh said: So you expect the democrats to actually impeach their own? as I said, go comb through the 2 twitter accounts I mentioned and you can see some of the text messages, irs whistleblower testimony, and much of th evidence again, choosing to ignore it is, your choice. I prefer to look at facts before I make a decision / form an opinion on anything in life cheers Al Franken says hi. 1 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 11 minutes ago, BlockerHigh said: You do know Jonathan Li is a known top level Chinese Spy right? you do know Hunter’s emails explain he is supposed to give 10% to the big guy, his business partners testified and have emails stating the Big guy is Joe, and finally that Hunter was selling the “brand” and the brand is clearly access. I suggest following the twitter accounts I mentioned, as I cannot go through it ALL here, and digging through those twitter accounts will. Top level spy? You dont say. What about this one invited to mar a lago? Sorry. "not invited" even though she had an actual invitation as a +1 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50553805 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-maralago-china-idUSKBN2082ER As for spying, funny you mention this. Because Trump sure did have some interesting statements made about him and kept some interesting company. Like, it's genuinely interesting how many "mistakes" were made that benefitted Russia, China and the middle east. More so that the person who ended up benefitting more often than not afterwards was....Trump It's amazing almost all of these are different instances in which Trump somehow managed to oops information to foreign nations, or somehow managed to benefit them or outright managed to profit off of them after policy changes to their benefit https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/29/trump-russia-asset-claims-former-kgb-spy-new-book https://www.timesofisrael.com/kgb-groomed-trump-as-an-asset-for-40-years-former-spy-says/ https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/u-s-has-new-intel-manafort-friend-kilimnik-gave-trump-n1264371 https://www.vox.com/2019/9/9/20856915/cnn-trump-russia-spy-putin-cia https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/19/trump-first-moscow-trip-215842/ https://www.npr.org/2017/05/15/528511980/report-trump-gave-classified-information-to-russians-during-white-house-visit https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/as-russia-probe-began-trump-called-on-nsa-spy-chief-for-help https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/520362-dont-forget-the-trump-campaign-gave-its-most-sensitive-data-to-a-russian/ But whatever, this is all media bias. Or you don't have time to read it all. or it doesn't matter what happened then it's what matters and happens now. Biden is in charge and blah blah blah. Right? 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlockerHigh Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Warhippy said: Which tiume was that? trump being impeached I mean? Your evidence, by the way thus far by the existing "witnesses" and the existing experts does not constitute any level of wrong doing on the current US presidents behalf, nor does it engender enough of a worry to warrant an actual impeachment trial. Whereas in comparison, trump was impeached twice on evidence that existed based on actions he committed to. I’ll just leave this here ps this is what Trump was impeached for For looking into biden admitting he bribed Burisma to fire a prosecutor who was trying to uncover corruption at the company Hunter was on the board of, and has no experience and thus no business being on the board of. they called it a trump quid pro quo when Joe is literally on video bragging about a quid pro quo projection at its finest I for one, think impeaching the man uncovering the crime is wrong. Edited September 28, 2023 by BlockerHigh 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DSVII Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 7 minutes ago, BlockerHigh said: So you expect the democrats to actually impeach their own? as I said, go comb through the 2 twitter accounts I mentioned and you can see some of the text messages, irs whistleblower testimony, and much of th evidence again, choosing to ignore it is, your choice. I prefer to look at facts before I make a decision / form an opinion on anything in life cheers Democrats are calling for the resignation of their own senator Menendez. Hardly a peep from Republicans about George Santos. So yes, Democrats actually hold themselves to a higher standard here. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlockerHigh Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 (edited) Just now, DSVII said: Democrats are calling for the resignation of their own senator Menendez. Hardly a peep from Republicans about George Santos. So yes, Democrats actually hold themselves to a higher standard here. Yes and now let’s do Biden Edited September 28, 2023 by BlockerHigh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 10 minutes ago, BlockerHigh said: So you expect the democrats to actually impeach their own? as I said, go comb through the 2 twitter accounts I mentioned and you can see some of the text messages, irs whistleblower testimony, and much of th evidence again, choosing to ignore it is, your choice. I prefer to look at facts before I make a decision / form an opinion on anything in life cheers The bile spewed by the GOP does not qualify as facts under any sane definition. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DSVII Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 Just now, BlockerHigh said: Yes and now let’s to Biden Deflection, Republicans need to hold their own accountable too and they aren't right now. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted September 28, 2023 Author Share Posted September 28, 2023 21 minutes ago, BlockerHigh said: You do know Jonathan Li is a known top level Chinese Spy right? you do know Hunter’s emails explain he is supposed to give 10% to the big guy, his business partners testified and have emails stating the Big guy is Joe, and finally that Hunter was selling the “brand” and the brand is clearly access. I suggest following the twitter accounts I mentioned, as I cannot go through it ALL here, and digging through those twitter accounts will. Do you any legitimate source(s) for any of those items you posted? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlockerHigh Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 3 minutes ago, Warhippy said: Top level spy? You dont say. What about this one invited to mar a lago? Sorry. "not invited" even though she had an actual invitation as a +1 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50553805 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-maralago-china-idUSKBN2082ER As for spying, funny you mention this. Because Trump sure did have some interesting statements made about him and kept some interesting company. Like, it's genuinely interesting how many "mistakes" were made that benefitted Russia, China and the middle east. More so that the person who ended up benefitting more often than not afterwards was....Trump It's amazing almost all of these are different instances in which Trump somehow managed to oops information to foreign nations, or somehow managed to benefit them or outright managed to profit off of them after policy changes to their benefit https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/29/trump-russia-asset-claims-former-kgb-spy-new-book https://www.timesofisrael.com/kgb-groomed-trump-as-an-asset-for-40-years-former-spy-says/ https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/u-s-has-new-intel-manafort-friend-kilimnik-gave-trump-n1264371 https://www.vox.com/2019/9/9/20856915/cnn-trump-russia-spy-putin-cia https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/19/trump-first-moscow-trip-215842/ https://www.npr.org/2017/05/15/528511980/report-trump-gave-classified-information-to-russians-during-white-house-visit https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/as-russia-probe-began-trump-called-on-nsa-spy-chief-for-help https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/520362-dont-forget-the-trump-campaign-gave-its-most-sensitive-data-to-a-russian/ But whatever, this is all media bias. Or you don't have time to read it all. or it doesn't matter what happened then it's what matters and happens now. Biden is in charge and blah blah blah. Right? 5 minutes ago, Warhippy said: Top level spy? You dont say. What about this one invited to mar a lago? Sorry. "not invited" even though she had an actual invitation as a +1 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50553805 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-maralago-china-idUSKBN2082ER As for spying, funny you mention this. Because Trump sure did have some interesting statements made about him and kept some interesting company. Like, it's genuinely interesting how many "mistakes" were made that benefitted Russia, China and the middle east. More so that the person who ended up benefitting more often than not afterwards was....Trump It's amazing almost all of these are different instances in which Trump somehow managed to oops information to foreign nations, or somehow managed to benefit them or outright managed to profit off of them after policy changes to their benefit https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/29/trump-russia-asset-claims-former-kgb-spy-new-book https://www.timesofisrael.com/kgb-groomed-trump-as-an-asset-for-40-years-former-spy-says/ https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/u-s-has-new-intel-manafort-friend-kilimnik-gave-trump-n1264371 https://www.vox.com/2019/9/9/20856915/cnn-trump-russia-spy-putin-cia https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/19/trump-first-moscow-trip-215842/ https://www.npr.org/2017/05/15/528511980/report-trump-gave-classified-information-to-russians-during-white-house-visit https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/as-russia-probe-began-trump-called-on-nsa-spy-chief-for-help https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/520362-dont-forget-the-trump-campaign-gave-its-most-sensitive-data-to-a-russian/ But whatever, this is all media bias. Or you don't have time to read it all. or it doesn't matter what happened then it's what matters and happens now. Biden is in charge and blah blah blah. Right? So you still think trump is a russian asset even after even cnn admitted Hilary paid for the Steele Dossier got it 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted September 28, 2023 Author Share Posted September 28, 2023 2 minutes ago, BlockerHigh said: Yes and now let’s do Biden Gross. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlockerHigh Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 Just now, Sharpshooter said: Do you any legitimate source(s) for any of those items you posted? Google it dude jesus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 1 minute ago, BlockerHigh said: I’ll just leave this here ps this is what Trump was impeached for For looking into biden admitting he bribed Burisma to fire a prosecutor who was trying to uncover corruption at the company Hunter was on the board of, and has no experience and thus no business being on the board of. they called it a trump quid pro quo when Joe is literally on video bragging about a quid pro quo projection at its finest I for one, think impeaching the man uncovering the crime is wrong. Ya so this situation you're claiming. Has thus far been refuted by almost everyone int he US intelligence community as well as every Ukranian involved in it. So again. Which time are you speaking of and where are the actual credible witnesses and evidence? As of now everything stated has been oft disproven. It's like asking about her emails after numerous investigations from almost every possible committee and intelligence/law enforcement division. But we'll ignore every issue currently before the former president and instead claim that he is a victim and wonder why oh why a hearing with zero merit or bearing with zero credible evidence in which the star witnesses already have stated in their own words it's utter garbage and nothing impeachable exists and just wonder why oh why Biden the great satan is still in power 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RupertKBD Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 9 minutes ago, BlockerHigh said: So you expect the democrats to actually impeach their own? as I said, go comb through the 2 twitter accounts I mentioned and you can see some of the text messages, irs whistleblower testimony, and much of th evidence again, choosing to ignore it is, your choice. I prefer to look at facts before I make a decision / form an opinion on anything in life cheers You haven't looked at any facts. You've looked at Republican bullshit. If they had evidence, they'd be doing a formal Impeachment proceeding. Even members of their own party say they don't have the goods. https://www.axios.com/2023/09/16/gop-rep-ken-buck-slams-mccarthy-impeachment-biden Quote Republicans "itching" to impeach President Biden are "relying on an imagined history," Rep. Ken Buck wrote in an op-ed criticizing his own party and the hard-line House Freedom Caucus, of which he is a member. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6of1_halfdozenofother Posted September 28, 2023 Share Posted September 28, 2023 Just now, BlockerHigh said: Google it dude jesus @Sharpshooter you need to change your title to "dude jesus". 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted September 28, 2023 Author Share Posted September 28, 2023 Just now, BlockerHigh said: Google it dude jesus You offered the claim. I’m just asking for some source material. If a factual statement is made, then evidence should also be provided. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.