Bob Long Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 3 hours ago, Sabrefan1 said: The only reason Nikki Haley is still running on the Republican ticket. She polls even better against Biden than Trump does. from a Canadian perspective, I'd be thrilled with Haley over Trump. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 11 minutes ago, Satchmo said: You really have only two points to make right? Regardless of what else might be said these are your only counterarguments? his other points are: I'm rubber, you're glue. and I know you are but what am I? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky Ravioli Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 4 minutes ago, Satchmo said: You really have only two points to make right? Regardless of what else might be said these are your only counterarguments? Those are the only 2 that I have argued. Don't care about the other stuff as I haven't been involved/don't care too. Much prefer just lurking and dropping in when I see something egregious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 17 minutes ago, RupertKBD said: Love this courtroom sketch of Agent Orange.... Apparently, he's playing football after the trial.... He'll be a wide receiver. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 5 minutes ago, Ricky Ravioli said: Those are the only 2 that I have argued. Don't care about the other stuff as I haven't been involved/don't care too. Much prefer just lurking and dropping in when I see something egregious. I'm a bit of a word nerd and it's nice to know another definition of the word egregious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Just now, King Heffy said: He'll be a wide receiver. maybe he'll go dual sport, and be a catcher not a pitcher. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Bob Long said: maybe he'll go dual sport, and be a catcher not a pitcher. I was thinking of a rugby position he'd be good at, between two props. Edited January 25 by King Heffy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kilgore Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 11 minutes ago, King Heffy said: He'll be a wide receiver. very wide Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 3 minutes ago, kilgore said: very wide 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky Ravioli Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 17 minutes ago, Satchmo said: I'm a bit of a word nerd and it's nice to know another definition of the word egregious. Look we don't agree and that's fine. So what's the point of this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4petesake Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 2 hours ago, RupertKBD said: Since pretty much every major news outlet carried the story, I'd say it reached a lot of them. In fact, I'd say that the ones most likely to have not heard about it are the ones who avoid MSM, because of what they would call "bias"....and what I would call "reporting facts that they don't want to hear".... ....you know....like the fact that the leading candidate for the Republican presidential nomination has dinner with a known anti-Semite and his white Supremacist buddies.... Setting aside the debate over whether or not he knew who Nick Fuentes was I will assume we can all agree that he knew full well who the Proud Boys were when he said this in his debate with Biden - "Proud Boys – stand back and stand by. But I'll tell you what, somebody's got to do something about antifa and the left." 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RupertKBD Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 9 minutes ago, Satchmo said: I'm a bit of a word nerd and it's nice to know another definition of the word egregious. Same......I've also developed a new appreciation for the word "bollixed" over the past several pages..... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 4 minutes ago, Ricky Ravioli said: Look we don't agree and that's fine. So what's the point of this? It's a dig. It's a chirp. It's a disagreement on what matters and what does not. It results from regret over wasted time and pixels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabrefan1 Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 34 minutes ago, Bob Long said: from a Canadian perspective, I'd be thrilled with Haley over Trump. The only way that happens is if the SCOTUS rules against Trump and more states remove him from their ballots. Then the Republican party would remove him from the race and that would leave Haley the last person standing. Personally I think that's the only reason why she has yet to concede the primary to Trump. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RupertKBD Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 6 minutes ago, 4petesake said: Setting aside the debate over whether or not he knew who Nick Fuentes was I will assume we can all agree that he knew full well who the Proud Boys were when he said this in his debate with Biden - "Proud Boys – stand back and stand by. But I'll tell you what, somebody's got to do something about antifa and the left." It's not even so much about whether Trump knew....It's about whether the voting public should care. Seems like on one hand, we have folks with their knickers in a twist over the fact that the Canadian Parliament honored a guy with Nazi connections, even though nobody knew about those connections and all members of the House applauded him.... ....and on the other hand, we have a former (and possibly future) POTUS associating with a known White Supremacist and the reaction is "who cares"? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky Ravioli Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 2 minutes ago, Satchmo said: It's a dig. It's a chirp. It's a disagreement on what matters and what does not. It results from regret over wasted time and pixels. Or you could just move on? Instead of as you say "wasting" your time The lame "digs" and "chirps" says more about you than anything about me 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RupertKBD Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 2 minutes ago, Sabrefan1 said: The only way that happens is if the SCOTUS rules against Trump and more states remove him from their ballots. Then the Republican party would remove him from the race and that would leave Haley the last person standing. Personally I think that's the only reason why she has yet to concede the primary to Trump. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kilgore Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 22 minutes ago, Bob Long said: from a Canadian perspective, I'd be thrilled with Haley over Trump. I'd be relieved. But not happy. She was the UN ambassador under Trump. She backed everything he did. All the deplorable behaviour and lies. She'd be a MAGA mouthpiece, and like the House, she wouldn't get anything done or undone unless it was approved by Trump and his cult. And she seems okay with that. Despite her weak sauce come backs at Trump about getting her name mixed up with Pelosi's. She'd just be a puppet of the extreme right. She'd be smarter though. And less of a narcissist who demands to be adored. So she'd be a definite improvement. I want Trump to run.....and lose badly. That would be the best outcome. And I think its possible. The more charges he is convicted of, the more he declines cognitively, the more Republicans will stay home on election day, if not vote for Biden. If Haley surges, wins her own state of South Carolina maybe, so other Republicans can see she can win, and move to her, and takes momentum away from the orange dimwit, she could still win. And if that happens, then old Joe is in for trouble. No matter how backwards and out of touch Haley is with most Americans, she is fresh, young(er), speaks well, and her gender will attract a lot of female independents, as well as some traditional Democratic voters. And Republicans will vote for her in droves. She is the perfect blend of MAGA extremism, (she will initiate an abortion ban nation wide), but with a media friendly disposition the MSM will designate as "moderate". And I think if that happens, no matter how bitter the fight, Trump will stand by her side and endorse her. If only to have a future President in his court to maybe hand him a few pardons. But no....I really hope Biden can squeak out a win. Not that I agree with everything he does. Or doesn't do. Its just a matter of protecting American democracy. Which would also protect ours, and also give pause to any dumb crybaby convoy fans that think they might bring Fascism to Canada as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 48 minutes ago, Bob Long said: from a Canadian perspective, I'd be thrilled with Haley over Trump. If nothing else it might prevent the civil war that is a potential outcome of a Biden victory. Then again, maybe not. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johngould21 Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Peter Navarro standing outside the courtroom. I need close to a MILLION DOLLARS, so could all of you listening or watching me, please donate so I can appeal my sentence. I guess he learned from the best of all grifters. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 17 minutes ago, Satchmo said: If nothing else it might prevent the civil war that is a potential outcome of a Biden victory. Then again, maybe not. I just think she'd be happy to ignore us. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Just now, Bob Long said: I just think she'd be happy to ignore us. I suppose it depends if JT is still around. No woman can resist him. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Just now, Satchmo said: I suppose it depends if JT is still around. No woman can resist him. He's newly single. Omg. Hide Melania. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4petesake Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 3 hours ago, the destroyer of worlds said: It was from the part of the speech where he was advocating for the death penalty for drug dealers. Think about how insane that is. Very firm on the death penalty for drug dealers…unless there’s money to be made from selling pardons. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBH1926 Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 3 hours ago, kilgore said: I've seen 10x more senile mumbo jumbo from Trump than Biden. Astounding how some in the MSM still puts Biden's age and speaking ability as a big difference and hurdle. According to Fox, Breitbart etc. Biden is a senile man whose brain has turned into mush. On the other hand, he is is this criminal mastermind whose family profited tremendously and not to mention pulling off biggest election theft in history. So which is it? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.