Jump to content

US Politics Thread


Sharpshooter

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, bolt said:

Your delusional to think if only Trump lies.  I guess Kamala Harris is the definition of excellence.  She's sort of the American version of Trudeau who never lies and nothing is ever her fault.   

 

To use an analogy....

 

"You're delusional if you think only Alex Ovechkin scores goals....Nils Aman scores goals too!".....:classic_sleep:

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bolt said:

Your delusional to think if only Trump lies. 

I guess Kamala Harris is the definition of excellence. 

She's sort of the American version of Trudeau who never lies and nothing is ever her fault.   

1) He does some other stuff from time to time but he lies a lot.

2) No, she's the definition of preference

3) .... (not worth a comment)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bishopshodan said:

 

Today, this rings louder than ever.

 

What a massive f*ck-up. 

He has helped put the world in real danger. 

It's all trumps fault from over 4 years ago.  We clearly should have gave Iran more money and access to nuclear enrichment, as the Iranian regime seems very trustworthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bishopshodan said:

 

Today, this rings louder than ever.

 

What a massive f*ck-up. 

He has helped put the world in real danger. 

It's all trumps fault from over 4 years ago.  We clearly should have gave Iran more money and access to nuclear enrichment, as the Iranian regime seems very trustworthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bolt said:

Vs whats happening in 2024 under the failed leadership of Democrats.  But only the "numbskulls" vote for Trump/

 

Yeah, those "failing" Democrats....why can't they clean up Trump's big steaming pile of shit?

 

As far as the second sentence goes, I'd say that's the first thing we've ever agreed on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bishopshodan said:

 

Today, this rings louder than ever.

 

What a massive f*ck-up. 

He has helped put the world in real danger. 

 

People also seem to forget the plane load full of Canadians that was shot down over Iranian airspace, because they thought it was another American attack.

  • Cheers 1
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RupertKBD said:

 

Yeah, those "failing" Democrats....why can't they clean up Trump's big steaming pile of shit?

 

As far as the second sentence goes, I'd say that's the first thing we've ever agreed on.

12 of the last 16 years of America has been ruled by Democrats.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bolt said:

It's all trumps fault from over 4 years ago.  We clearly should have gave Iran more money and access to nuclear enrichment, as the Iranian regime seems very trustworthy.

 

Iran was complying.

 

Why would he do such a daft thing?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, RupertKBD said:

 

People also seem to forget the plane load full of Canadians that was shot down over Iranian airspace, because they thought it was another American attack.

Don't want to blame the Islamic regime for shooting down an aircraft.  It's understandable that the Iranian regime confused a aircraft that was taking off for a missile.  Trudeau was right to shake the hands of the Iranian terrorists a year after the attack because it was clearly Trumps fault.  

 

Trudeau criticized for shaking hands with Iranian foreign minister after deadly plane crash - National | Globalnews.ca

Edited by bolt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, bolt said:

Fact check Did Iran attack an American ally in Trump's 4 years? Answer: NO

The same is true for most American Presidents.   Trump is not special here.

 

Half of his term took place in a global pandemic - a time when you would not really expect wars to break out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RupertKBD said:

 

So? They weren't the ones who killed the nuclear deal. They were, however, the ones that negotiated it in the first place.

The nuclear deal wasn't a good deal.  Why do you think giving access to billions of dollars to a terrorist organization is a good thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bolt said:

The nuclear deal wasn't a good deal.  Why do you think giving access to billions of dollars to a terrorist organization is a good thing?

Can you expand on the giving access to billions of dollars to a terrorist organization part?  What's that about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bolt said:

The nuclear deal wasn't a good deal.  Why do you think giving access to billions of dollars to a terrorist organization is a good thing?

 

Yes, it was. According to everyone involved, (with the exception of the Trump administration) they were complying with the terms of the deal.

 

As to your second question, it was their money.

  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Satchmo said:

Can you expand on the giving access to billions of dollars to a terrorist organization part?  What's that about?

 

I don't believe he knows. They were Iranian assets that the US government had frozen by various countries, where it was being stored. Iraq, Qatar and maybe some others....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Satchmo said:

And we know this because Trump has told us so and he would never lie to us. 

If pumpkinhead is elected and Iran carries out it’s planned assassin of him, then JD Vance would be the Commander in Chief. 

That would be a shit show of monumental proportions. 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bolt said:

The nuclear deal wasn't a good deal.  Why do you think giving access to billions of dollars to a terrorist organization is a good thing?

 

What deal is in place now?

 

They were complying. Now there is no oversight. 

 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bolt said:

If the deal was so good why doesn't Biden and Kamala renew it?  You know they've been in power for 4 years?

 

You make it sound so easy....:classic_rolleyes:

 

Why would the Iranians agree to another deal, when they know that the Americans will probably tear it up the next time a moron like Trump takes office?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bolt said:

If the deal was so good why doesn't Biden and Kamala renew it?  You know they've been in power for 4 years?

Don't know.  I'll look it up if you really want to pursue this.  I'm replying mainly to point out how silly it is to say Biden AND Kamala.  Biden was President; not Harris.   I notice you don't mention Pence when you list all the wonderful things Trump has done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember all the criticism of Kamala for not doing interviews?

 

Well, guess which 300 lb chicken is skipping the 60 Minutes pre-election interview?

 

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/entertainment/other/trump-won-t-participate-in-interview-for-60-minutes-election-special/ar-AA1ryarS?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=5d8ec3c472b34317a24239e428049941&ei=23

 

 

Quote

 

CBS News said Tuesday that Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has declined to participate in an interview with “60 Minutes” for its election special, which will go forward next Monday with Democratic opponent Kamala Harris alone.

Television's top-rated news program regularly invites the two presidential contenders for separate interviews that air back-to-back on a show near the election. This year, it is scheduled for Monday instead of its usual Sunday time slot.

Asked for comment, the former president's campaign spokesman Steven Cheung said, “Fake news," adding that there were discussions but nothing was ever locked in.

“60 Minutes” said Trump's campaign had initially agreed to an interview before telling CBS that the former president would not appear. The network said its invitation to sit for an interview still stands, and correspondent Scott Pelley will explain Trump's absence to viewers.

Vice President Harris will appear in a pretaped interviewed with Bill Whitaker.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, bolt said:

If the deal was so good why doesn't Biden and Kamala renew it?  You know they've been in power for 4 years?

 

I never said the deal was 'so good'. But it was at least a deal that permitted oversight. That is better than nothing...

Biden wanted to renew and talked about it. 

Trump imposed maximum pressure sanctions which made support on their side plummet. The Iranians little trust of the US was gone. I believe they now demand all sanctions removed before they would talk again. The world has changed too, wars are going on including the mess in M.E.

Edited by bishopshodan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bolt said:

 

Why would anyone vote for Kamala.  It's not a coincidence that we are on the brink of war because of weakness.

Because the alternative is one of the biggest pieces of garbage on the planet who is waging a war against democracy and has already committed crimes against humanity.  No point in voting for a worthless coward who can't even treat the military with respect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...