Coconuts Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPA Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 Pass. Laine is damaged goods. Hasn’t played over 56 games since joining CBJ. 50pt player getting $8.7M. Too rich. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasCanuck Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 3 minutes ago, Coconuts said: Got a beat up old car I'd trade for him.... 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 6 minutes ago, Coconuts said: Grossly negative value. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKSR Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 1 minute ago, BPA said: Pass. Laine is damaged goods. Hasn’t played over 56 games since joining CBJ. 50pt player getting $8.7M. Too rich. Sounds like Columbus should retain $3M and trade him to Vancouver. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olli Juolevi Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 If CBJ retains like $2M or more I'd be all over it, but then it might become a bidding war that we don't want to be a part of. He still scores goals when he's in the lineup. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasCanuck Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 1 minute ago, HKSR said: Sounds like Columbus should retain $3M and trade him to Vancouver. Actually, if they were to retain him down to about 4.5 million, I would probably take a flyer on him. With his size and shot, if he can find his game again, he'd look really good playing with Pettersson feeding him the puck. 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BPA Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 3 minutes ago, HKSR said: Sounds like Columbus should retain $3M and trade him to Vancouver. Retention would be nice. Laine ($4M retained) for Mik + 3rd 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuchaNuxtalgia Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 Man, there were some hefty disappointments from that '16 draft! Bloody minefield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker67 Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 JR and Allvin like those reclamation players. Laine has been away from hockey for mental health reasons, and now seems to want to return to the game, but get a fresh start. Is Laine salvageable? CBJ would need to retain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elias Pettersson Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 20 minutes ago, HKSR said: Sounds like Columbus should retain $3M and trade him to Vancouver. Laine for Mikheyev? 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Gurn Posted June 12 Popular Post Share Posted June 12 Anyone that is ok with Laine at 8.7 mill--- better not moan about Lindholm at $8. which is too much for either of them-for the Canucks, at least. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grandmaster Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 19 minutes ago, Olli Juolevi said: If CBJ retains like $2M or more I'd be all over it, but then it might become a bidding war that we don't want to be a part of. He still scores goals when he's in the lineup. That 2M retention and they take Mik Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olli Juolevi Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 2 minutes ago, Grandmaster said: That 2M retention and they take Mik If they're retaining $2M or more and taking Mikheyev's full contact, I think that price starts to get pretty high. Maybe Lekkerrimaki and a first? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted June 12 Author Share Posted June 12 28 minutes ago, VegasCanuck said: Got a beat up old car I'd trade for him.... 26 minutes ago, Alflives said: Grossly negative value. I imagine retainment would be in order, so not necessarily 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 7 minutes ago, Elias Pettersson said: Laine for Mikheyev? Have to be retention on Laine as well. But I doubt he'd survive one season under Tocc. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJC Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 28 minutes ago, VegasCanuck said: Got a beat up old car I'd trade for him.... It’s still a Jeep - even in that condition arguably a better purchase than Laine 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrammaInTheTub Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 Laine hasn’t sniffed 30 goals in going on six years. It’s been largely injury related so he may have paced 35-40 over 82… but that’s going on six years of not staying healthy. Add his two-way game concerns on top of that? No thank you - not cohesive with the culture we’re cultivating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grandmaster Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 5 minutes ago, Olli Juolevi said: If they're retaining $2M or more and taking Mikheyev's full contact, I think that price starts to get pretty high. Maybe Lekkerrimaki and a first? Ah no. Lane is a negative value contract. Far worse than Mik. No way we send that or even one of that 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 3 minutes ago, RWJC said: It’s still a Jeep - even in that condition arguably a better purchase than Laine As long as the frame is not bent, and not rusted. At least then you have something to work with. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 12 minutes ago, Elias Pettersson said: Laine for Mikheyev? Laine for Mik + Garland was talked about on 650. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olli Juolevi Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 1 minute ago, Grandmaster said: Ah no. Lane is a negative value contract. Far worse than Mik. No way we send that or even one of that He's still scored at a solid 30+ goal rate each of the last 3 seasons, and in you're scenario they're both retaining on him and taking the full value of Mikheyev's contract. That's going to cost some decent assets. His issues are mostly personal and there's going to be plenty of GM's willing to bet on a fresh start helping him out on and off the ice. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzy Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 I would do Laine and Chinakhov for Garland. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrammaInTheTub Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Olli Juolevi said: He's still scored at a solid 30+ goal rate each of the last 3 seasons, and in you're scenario they're both retaining on him and taking the full value of Mikheyev's contract. That's going to cost some decent assets. His issues are mostly personal and there's going to be plenty of GM's willing to bet on a fresh start helping him out on and off the ice. I hope he’s able to find his love for all the good things in life, including his love of the game Edited June 12 by GrammaInTheTub Original post made without some knowledge and original post no longer fit with my world view Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24K Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 Laine and PLD are the divas of the nhl. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts