Jump to content
All Thread Titles Must Contain Tags

[PGT] Holy Cow we did Things!! - Free Agency Thread - July 1st

Honkin Hronek
 Share

Who stays, who goes?  

153 members have voted

  1. 1. Which of the following Canuck forwards will still be Canucks at the start of Pre-Season?

  2. 2. Which of the following Canuck defencemen will still be Canucks at the start of Pre-Season?

  3. 3. Which of the following Canuck goalies will still be Canucks at the start of Pre-Season?

    • Thatcher Demko
      154
    • Arturs Silovs (RFA)
      144
    • Casey DeSmith (UFA)
      8

Recommended Posts

Ghostsof1915 All-Star

Ghostsof1915

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jim Tim said:

Still lacking a top 4 D... how do we feel about trading for Ekblad w/ salary retained? 1 year left on his contract, could always flip him later on. There's also Carrier who looks to have 2nd pairing 2-way upside.

Ekblad has a lot of wear and tear and mileage on him. 50% retained would be what it would take, and I don't see Florida doing that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Duke All-Star

The Duke

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, wai_lai416 said:

so Juulsen replaces zadorov? You know soucy was the least deployed defenseman in tight games or tied games last season right not including ur 2 offensive guy Hughes and hronek? Now he’s going to be the #1 or 2 guy in those situation 


We didn’t start the year with Zadorov.

 

I’m also not sure where you’re going with that obscure stat. Forbort is a defensive defenceman with PK utility - holding down a lead should be something he can help with. 
 

Im sure Cole was up there for us, but he declined as the year went on.  Why can’t Soucy or Myers do that, either? 

Edited by The Duke
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jim Tim AHL Prospect

Jim Tim

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

Ekblad has a lot of wear and tear and mileage on him. 50% retained would be what it would take, and I don't see Florida doing that.

For sure, I wouldn't be comfortable signing him long term but if we could retain on him and fit him under the salary cap, might be a good win-now type of move?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BTueyCanucksFan Minor Leaguer

BTueyCanucksFan

Posted
Posted
Just now, Jim Tim said:

For sure, I wouldn't be comfortable signing him long term but if we could retain on him and fit him under the salary cap, might be a good win-now type of move?

It could,  but realistically you could take the same risk and get Zaitsev for cheaper

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sika21 Prospect

Sika21

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, The Duke said:


We didn’t start the year with Zadorov.

 

I’m also not sure where you’re going with that obscure stat. Forbort is a defensive defenceman with PK utility - holding down a lead should be something he can help with. 
 

Im sure Cole was up there for us, but he declined as the year went on.  Why can’t Soucy or Myers do that, either? 

Did Dillon sign anywhere yet?

2 hours ago, Chon derry said:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RupertKBD All-Star

RupertKBD

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

Edmonton shows they really don't learn.

They signed Perry.

 

Obviously they were super impressed with Perry's trolling prowess....

 

417955.thumb.webp.36899b46c67ad39d030f092648cb38f1.webp

 

Pretty sure this was CP's most significant contribution against the Canucks.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Duke All-Star

The Duke

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Nucker67 said:

Shit. Leafs improved their D, again

 

Tanev

OEL

Hakanpaa


Injury concerns with that group but I’d be happy if I were a Leafs fan. Treliving does like his blue lines. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ghostsof1915 All-Star

Ghostsof1915

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, hockeyfan-observer said:

Must be running out of cap space pretty soon with all their signings - or do the Leafs get an extension like Vegas 🙂

Two different rulebooks, two different salary caps? Sounds right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
R3aL All-Star

R3aL

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Nucker67 said:

Shit. Leafs improved their D, again

 

Tanev

OEL

Hakanpaa

Hakanpaa was a good signing OEL I don’t know and tanev deal won’t age well 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
-dlc- All-Star

-dlc-

Posted
Posted

I think most of us agree that losing Big Z is a HUGE loss. You just don't find players that bring what he does. And having him on our side made us that much more difficult to play against. And Boston!???!!! No.

 

With that, I think the ball was in his court and he'd decided to take it to free agency and wasn't going to accept an offer here based on that. I don't know that if we'd gone to $5.5 he would've bit...he wanted to "see" for himself. Especially knowing multiple teams were interested and that could drive up his price.

 

He chased the money and we can't blame him for that. Except hopefully he'll regret his decision.

  • Cheers 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
-dlc- All-Star

-dlc-

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, hockeyfan-observer said:

Must be running out of cap space pretty soon with all their signings - or do the Leafs get an extension like Vegas 🙂

Their signings are in yen.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
canuck73_3 All-Star

canuck73_3

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

Edmonton shows they really don't learn.

They signed Perry.

At least they guaranteed another finals loss. Unless they pull a big brain move and trade him to Boston and beat them in the finals 😂

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ghostsof1915 All-Star

Ghostsof1915

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, -dlc- said:

I think most of us agree that losing Big Z is a HUGE loss. You just don't find players that bring what he does. And having him on our side made us that much more difficult to play against. And Boston!???!!! No.

 

With that, I think the ball was in his court and he'd decided to take it to free agency and wasn't going to accept an offer here based on that. I don't know that if we'd gone to $5.5 he would've bit...he wanted to "see" for himself. Especially knowing multiple teams were interested and that could drive up his price.

 

He chased the money and we can't blame him for that. Except hopefully he'll regret his decision.

I posted this on the Zads thread. But it bears repeating.

 

 

unnamed.jpg

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RupertKBD All-Star

RupertKBD

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, -dlc- said:

I think most of us agree that losing Big Z is a HUGE loss. You just don't find players that bring what he does. And having him on our side made us that much more difficult to play against. And Boston!???!!! No.

 

With that, I think the ball was in his court and he'd decided to take it to free agency and wasn't going to accept an offer here based on that. I don't know that if we'd gone to $5.5 he would've bit...he wanted to "see" for himself. Especially knowing multiple teams were interested and that could drive up his price.

 

He chased the money and we can't blame him for that. Except hopefully he'll regret his decision.

 

We don't know for sure, but my guess is that he chased term, rather than money. PA likely made the 5 million offer as was reported, but likely weren't going to go 6 years....

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...