RWJC Posted June 23 Share Posted June 23 List Of Players Getting Trade Protection On July 1st June 23rd, 2024 at 9:00am CST • By Brennan McClain In the current Collective Bargaining Agreement between the NHL and NHLPA, the league players can procure three types of No-Move Clauses in their contracts. The only stipulations to these clauses are that the player in question must be 27 years of age or older and must have accrued seven years of service time at the NHL level. The three types of No-Move Clauses are as follows: No Movement Clause (NMC), No Trade Clause (NTC), and Modified NMC or NTC. Per the current CBA, an NMC means that a player cannot be waived, assigned to minors, or traded without their consent, and they also must be protected in the event of an Expansion Draft. An NTC is straightforward — giving the player protection from being traded without their approval. Lastly, a modified NMC or NTC sets an arbitrary number of teams and a time frame when a player can use this protection. In just over a week, an assortment of players will receive trade protection on their current contracts, and CapFriendly has broken it down. No Movement Clauses D Charlie McAvoy (Boston) F Sebastian Aho (Carolina) D Devon Toews (Colorado) F Roope Hintz (Dallas) D Gustav Forsling (Florida) F Kirill Kaprizov (Minnesota) F Joel Eriksson Ek (Minnesota) F Jesper Bratt (New Jersey) F Timo Meier (New Jersey) G Ilya Sorokin (NY Islanders) F Pierre-Luc Dubois (Washington) No Trade Clauses F Ross Colton (Colorado) D Nick Seeler (Philadelphia) D Vince Dunn (Seattle) F Clayton Keller (Utah) D Erik Cernak (Tampa Bay) D Mikhail Sergachev (Tampa Bay) Modified No Trade Clauses F Jordan Greenway (Buffalo) – eight-team no-trade list F Tage Thompson (Buffal0) – five-team no-trade list D Rasmus Andersson (Calgary) – six-team no-trade list D Samuel Girard (Colorado) – nine-team no-trade list F Miles Wood (Colorado) – six-team no-trade list F Alex DeBrincat (Detroit) – 16-team no-trade list F Adrian Kempe (Los Angeles) – 10-team no-trade list F Nico Hischier (New Jersey) – 10-team no-trade list D John Marino (New Jersey) – eight-team no-trade list D Jonas Siegenthaler (New Jersey) – 10-team no-trade list F Mathew Barzal (NY Islanders) – 22-team no-trade list D Thomas Chabot (Ottawa) – 10-team no-trade list F Tanner Jeannot (Tampa Bay) – 16-team no-trade list F Kyle Connor (Winnipeg) – 10-team no-trade list https://www.prohockeyrumors.com/2024/06/list-of-players-getting-trade-protection-on-july-1st.html#ref=home 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted June 23 Share Posted June 23 I wonder what Tampa wants for Jeannot.... or more correctly what they can get. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.Am.Ironman Posted June 23 Share Posted June 23 Obviously the LAK wanted out from PLD before his protection kicked in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern_Nuck Posted June 23 Share Posted June 23 7 minutes ago, Bob Long said: I wonder what Tampa wants for Jeannot.... or more correctly what they can get. Thought about that too and I would love him here as a 4th line Center/PK/grit guy. But I’m almost certain Vancouver is on his no trade list. 16 teams either indicates tax reasons or a whole conference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted June 23 Share Posted June 23 5 minutes ago, Northern_Nuck said: Thought about that too and I would love him here as a 4th line Center/PK/grit guy. But I’m almost certain Vancouver is on his no trade list. 16 teams either indicates tax reasons or a whole conference. Sure but he doesn't have a choice right now. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrammaInTheTub Posted June 23 Share Posted June 23 7 minutes ago, Bob Long said: Sure but he doesn't have a choice right now. Seeing LA pull the bandaid off of the bad trade that was acquiring PLD could maybe embolden TB to cut their losses (a whole draft year) and recoup what they can with a “he was a bad fit / fit for a bounce back” narrative. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted June 23 Share Posted June 23 11 minutes ago, GrammaInTheTub said: Seeing LA pull the bandaid off of the bad trade that was acquiring PLD could maybe embolden TB to cut their losses (a whole draft year) and recoup what they can with a “he was a bad fit / fit for a bounce back” narrative. There's just no way to recover what they gave up, plus he's one year from ufa. I do think he's poised for a bounce back. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Money Posted June 24 Share Posted June 24 I’ve often wondered if Tampa might trade Sergachev. His giant cap hit is a problem, and his sudden injury-prone-ness doesn’t fit their win-now goals. Them bringing back McDonagh right before Serg’s trade protection kicks might also be a tip of the hand. And that clears the room they need to re-sign Stamkos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.