Coconuts Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Ghostsof1915 Posted June 26 Popular Post Share Posted June 26 4 is pretty broad. I'd rather see a crackdown on embellishment. 2 3 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Colt 45s Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 Wow, did not think these penalties were an issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Coconuts Posted June 26 Author Popular Post Share Posted June 26 7 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said: 4 is pretty broad. I'd rather see a crackdown on embellishment. You call it embellishment, the NHL calls it parity 6 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 Not bad rules, but the league really does need to bring in an automatic 5 and a game for embellishment, with suspensions for repeat offenders and refs who fail to call it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Rekker Posted June 26 Popular Post Share Posted June 26 11 minutes ago, Coconuts said: You call it embellishment, the NHL calls it parity NHL calls it parity, Oilers call it foundational. 1 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 11 minutes ago, Rekker said: NHL calls it parity, Oilers call it foundational. Pouty McDiver approves of this message! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck You Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 How about actually suspending players...For you know, Shit like this...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elias Pettersson Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 I was hoping they’d institute a new penalty for crying… 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kragar Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 Don't like rule 3 much. It's too easy to have the net come off if you have to hug the post on those tight angle shots. Seem to recall this being an issue for Demmer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rekker Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 (edited) 1 hour ago, Canuck You said: How about actually suspending players...For you know, Shit like this...? Douche move. And some posters on here wonder why we hated on that slag team and it's kneepad media. Edited June 26 by Rekker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RupertKBD Posted June 27 Share Posted June 27 "Ratified"? Does that mean they had to consult Brad Marchand? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pianoman Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 On 6/26/2024 at 3:06 PM, Kragar said: Don't like rule 3 much. It's too easy to have the net come off if you have to hug the post on those tight angle shots. Seem to recall this being an issue for Demmer. I think it’s ok though. It’s not like it’s a penalty. Makes sense that if it’s your fault you get punished for it. Just prevents a player or a goalie doing it ‘accidentally on purpose’ to get a whistle for a change if they are tired. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kragar Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 10 minutes ago, Pianoman said: I think it’s ok though. It’s not like it’s a penalty. Makes sense that if it’s your fault you get punished for it. Just prevents a player or a goalie doing it ‘accidentally on purpose’ to get a whistle for a change if they are tired. Yep, the underlying purpose is good. It's just that the posts are made so easy to dislodge for player safety, that I wonder how often a team (especially ours, given how often it seems Demko does this) will get hit with it in cases when it truly is accidental. Assumes that it is generally an accident when it happens with Demko. If it is deliberate more often than not, then he needs to watch out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Posted July 2 Share Posted July 2 On 6/26/2024 at 3:06 PM, Kragar said: Don't like rule 3 much. It's too easy to have the net come off if you have to hug the post on those tight angle shots. Seem to recall this being an issue for Demmer. I think it's fine The whistle needs to be blown down on this anyways. The defending team just can't change and the offensive team gets to choose the side No penalty is called Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kragar Posted July 2 Share Posted July 2 20 minutes ago, Johnny said: I think it's fine The whistle needs to be blown down on this anyways. The defending team just can't change and the offensive team gets to choose the side No penalty is called And not having the chance to change can be important. Odds are, it evens out and is not a big deal. If only it wasn't so easy to have happen. If it is done deliberately, it's a penalty. If it's an accident, it's an accident and there shouldn't be consequences. But maybe this really is a good idea... I guess this will help cut down on "accidents" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.