Rocket-68 Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 (edited) If Edmonton retained 50% with another team retaining a further 25%, I would be open to trading a once-fucked chicken (donated by @Devron) for him with performance bonuses that included playing 82 games without being a dickwad. Edited June 30 by Rocket-68 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post RWJC Posted June 30 Author Popular Post Share Posted June 30 2 minutes ago, Rocket-68 said: If Edmonton retained 50% with another team retaining a further 25%, I would be open to trading a once-fucked chicken (donated by @Devron) for him with performance bonuses that included playing 82 games without being a dickwad. Some Chick-Filled-Eh? 5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 4 minutes ago, Rocket-68 said: If Edmonton retained 50% with another team retaining a further 25%, I would be open to trading a once-fucked chicken (donated by @Devron) for him with performance bonuses that included playing 82 games without being a dickwad. Myers will just throw his sweats into the showers again.....no thanks. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrJockitch Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 Just now, Ghostsof1915 said: Myers will just throw his sweats into the showers again.....no thanks. For all the BS that guy pulled over the years, getting upset about an athlete is a sweatsuit just seems dumb. I think the idea that professional hockey players need to dress like bankers is so antiquated and dumb. Do they really think putting an athlete in a suit helps bring in new millennial customers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 5 minutes ago, DrJockitch said: For all the BS that guy pulled over the years, getting upset about an athlete is a sweatsuit just seems dumb. I think the idea that professional hockey players need to dress like bankers is so antiquated and dumb. Do they really think putting an athlete in a suit helps bring in new millennial customers. It's about looking professional. It was worse before. Considering in the 30's-50's, if you wore say a bomber jacket and walked into the Leafs locker room. They would pull you aside. Get you to go with a team rep or another player, and you'd get a coat, hat, and suit so you'd "Look like a Leaf". A Leafs rookie went into MLG all proud of his fur coat (Because it was snowing) they took him to get into a suit and coat right away. It's considered "work". What you wear away from the rink is your own business. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 This has Treliving written all over it. He'll blow 12 mil on this douche and big Z. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrJockitch Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 2 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said: It's about looking professional. It was worse before. Considering in the 30's-50's, if you wore say a bomber jacket and walked into the Leafs locker room. They would pull you aside. Get you to go with a team rep or another player, and you'd get a coat, hat, and suit so you'd "Look like a Leaf". A Leafs rookie went into MLG all proud of his fur coat (Because it was snowing) they took him to get into a suit and coat right away. It's considered "work". What you wear away from the rink is your own business. Yes and that is exactly what I said, antiquated and somewhat prejudiced against anyone who doesn’t work in an office. Shit, even in offices these days suits are becoming less and less common. ‘It is considered work sure, but so is construction and I don’t see a lot of suits and hard hat combos. ‘Antiquated and archaic. Most of the guys wear a suit to get on an airplane and then immediately change into regular clothing on the plane. Coaches are on the bench in golf shirts frequently now. ‘Let these guys dress how they want, let them play with fashion more if they want to like Zads does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 4 minutes ago, Bob Long said: This has Treliving written all over it. He'll blow 12 mil on this douche and big Z. Not even he's that stu--- yeah you're right I can see it too. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBH1926 Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 3 minutes ago, Bob Long said: This has Treliving written all over it. He'll blow 12 mil on this douche and big Z. He will spend that kind of money on Zadorov and Tanev probably. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 1 minute ago, CBH1926 said: He will spend that kind of money on Zadorov and Tanev probably. No, dad is coming home. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 3 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said: Not even he's that stu--- yeah you're right I can see it too. Right ? "We need to protect our stars" blah blah. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBH1926 Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 Highlight of Kane’s career is when he knocked out cold Matt Cooke. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reg Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 Kane along with Nicholson, Keith, and Perry define the character of the Oilers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKSR Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 From the Stanley Cup Finals thread... Buyout Campbell... check. Trade Kane... in progress. Ceci next. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker67 Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 I don't like Kane, he was an a-hole to play against, but I wonder what it would be like to have that nastiness on our team. Would we feel differently if he was playing hard and battling in a Canucks uniform? I'd feel a bit dirty bringing him to the team, but if he played with Petey, could he turn out to be a good team guy and help Petey produce? Tocchet might really like that size and grittiness. Podkolzin and Hirose for Kane Kane had 6 more goals last season than Podkolzin has had in his whole NHL career. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 Don’t get any ideas 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boudrias Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 I thought Kane had kinda resurrected his career in Edmonton. I felt he played a decent game but his offence tailed off before the season ended. He was on the 3rd line and wasn't happy. Apparently he got injured playing the Canucks in Round 2. Kane doesn't fit in Vancouver for the money he is being paid. I rather the team look elsewhere at his age. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 Absolutely not 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rekker Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 Just stay away. No thanks. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Brodka Jr Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 Fuck this guy! Probably have to get rid of him or Draisaitl won't re-sign.. Such a P.O.S! Players don't even want this child abandoning scumbag in their locker room. Such a cancer. Hard pass.. Will be THRILLED when this Muppet is out of the league! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistolPete13 Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 1 hour ago, Ghostsof1915 said: Vegas? Black Hawks 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 2 hours ago, stawns said: To be fair, I never said I wanted Kane, just that it'd be a way to weaponize the salary cap for once and to also fill a couple of spots on the roster We’re trying to win weaponizing cap for a mediocre cancerous winger does nothing to help that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 (edited) 2 hours ago, Rocket-68 said: If Edmonton retained 50% with another team retaining a further 25%, I would be open to trading a once-fucked chicken (donated by @Devron) for him with performance bonuses that included playing 82 games without being a dickwad. Id rather try and get Lavoie out of the deal than retention Edited June 30 by stawns Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CurtFraser24 Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 2 hours ago, Nucker67 said: I don't like Kane, he was an a-hole to play against, but I wonder what it would be like to have that nastiness on our team. Would we feel differently if he was playing hard and battling in a Canucks uniform? I'd feel a bit dirty bringing him to the team, but if he played with Petey, could he turn out to be a good team guy and help Petey produce? Tocchet might really like that size and grittiness. Podkolzin and Hirose for Kane Kane had 6 more goals last season than Podkolzin has had in his whole NHL career. 23 year old PF just starting his career vs 32 year old soon to be out of the league. JR and PL are not dumb. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hogs and Podz Posted June 30 Share Posted June 30 2 hours ago, Nucker67 said: Podkolzin and Hirose for Kane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.