Wiggums Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 2 minutes ago, Satchmo said: Would I be smug or arrogant if I was to ask how that differs from some of the posts you have graced us with? The left's number one play is to cancel and silence differing views. The left contains the more fragile, sensitive types 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RupertKBD Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 41 minutes ago, Ricky Ravioli said: Why do people on this board assume soo much about others? Occam's Razor.... If the bulk of your posts suggest you're a bigoted prick, there's a pretty good chance that you're a bigoted prick.... 1 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DSVII Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 12 minutes ago, Rob Eh said: You guys assume alot, then throw out chirps based on your assumptions. I won't vote lib or con, i don't trust either. Do you accept the fact that there has been at least one example of someone being attacked in Canada over a gender issue? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 3 minutes ago, Wiggums said: The left's number one play is to cancel and silence differing views. The left contains the more fragile, sensitive types Like banning books? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiggums Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 (edited) 1 minute ago, Satchmo said: Like banning books? Protecting children from pornography is bad mmkay Edited February 16 by Wiggums 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 Just now, Wiggums said: Protecting children from pornography is bad mmkay I was not talking about pornography. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boudrias Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 5 minutes ago, Wiggums said: The left's number one play is to cancel and silence differing views. The left contains the more fragile, sensitive types If the left cannot BS their way through a issue they either change the parameters or the subject. What I want from PP or even the Liberals is a realistic assessment of the countries finances. Cut the politics out and put the facts on the table. In business we always had to do forecasts and then measure them against what actually happened. That is not happening in a serious way right now. All you have to do is drive through any town with your eyes open to realize how bad things are. I have no idea if PP can turn this country around or not. I don't think so. But what we do know is the Lib/NDP coalition is not getting it done. Not close. 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiggums Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 1 minute ago, Satchmo said: I was not talking about pornography. I literally posted a picture from a page from one of the books that were banned from a school and I got penalized here for posting pornographic material lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 1 minute ago, Boudrias said: If the left cannot BS their way through a issue they either change the parameters or the subject. What I want from PP or even the Liberals is a realistic assessment of the countries finances. Cut the politics out and put the facts on the table. In business we always had to do forecasts and then measure them against what actually happened. That is not happening in a serious way right now. All you have to do is drive through any town with your eyes open to realize how bad things are. I have no idea if PP can turn this country around or not. I don't think so. But what we do know is the Lib/NDP coalition is not getting it done. Not close. This is another thing I have seen from all sides. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 1 minute ago, Wiggums said: I literally posted a picture from a page from one of the books that were banned from a school and I got penalized here for posting pornographic material lol I remember. I was talking more about banning Toni Morrison, Margaret Atwood, John Steinbeck, Harper Lee..... 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6of1_halfdozenofother Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 1 minute ago, Satchmo said: I remember. I was talking more about banning Toni Morrison, Margaret Atwood, John Steinbeck, Harper Lee..... zOMG, not Margaret Atwood, that master pornographer! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RupertKBD Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 4 minutes ago, Wiggums said: Protecting children from pornography is bad mmkay Oh yes, we need to "protect" kids from the horrors of pornography, lest it turn them into sex-crazed rapists......or something.... But guns? Fffffttt.....no "protection" needed there..... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky Ravioli Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 29 minutes ago, RupertKBD said: Occam's Razor.... If the bulk of your posts suggest you're a bigoted prick, there's a pretty good chance that you're a bigoted prick.... Point to a post where I have said something bigoted? What a ridiculous thing to accuse Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd. Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 (edited) 58 minutes ago, Wiggums said: Poiliviere make sense common again please. Trudeau is tossing away billions of dollars while Canadians live on the streets I’ll be voting Pierre because I’d rather him than Trudeau. I’ll just say this though. Be prepared to be disappointed. Pierre’s a con artist. Edited February 16 by Odd. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RupertKBD Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 7 minutes ago, Ricky Ravioli said: Point to a post where I have said something bigoted? What a ridiculous thing to accuse Oh were you referring to yourself? That wasn't clear when you responded to Jimmy's post. You asked why people make assumptions, and I responded by saying that their posting history is the reason. As far as instances of bigotry go, I'm sure I could find several if I cared to look, but TBH, I can't be bothered. Carry on with your faux outrage.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky Ravioli Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 1 minute ago, RupertKBD said: Oh were you referring to yourself? That wasn't clear when you responded to Jimmy's post. You asked why people make assumptions, and I responded by saying that their posting history is the reason. As far as instances of bigotry go, I'm sure I could find several if I cared to look, but TBH, I can't be bothered. Carry on with your faux outrage.... 43 minutes ago, RupertKBD said: Occam's Razor.... If the bulk of your posts suggest you're a bigoted prick, there's a pretty good chance that you're a bigoted prick.... Are you using the wrong "your" or you are referring to me. Which is it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RupertKBD Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 1 minute ago, Ricky Ravioli said: Are you using the wrong "your" or you are referring to me. Which is it? It was meant euphemistically.....but if it makes you feel better, I could go back and change "your" to "ones"..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky Ravioli Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 5 minutes ago, RupertKBD said: It was meant euphemistically.....but if it makes you feel better, I could go back and change "your" to "ones"..... Well when you quote me while saying that it doesn't quite come across like that to me but I digress Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 1 hour ago, Ricky Ravioli said: Why do people on this board assume soo much about others? 5 minutes ago, RupertKBD said: It was meant euphemistically.....but if it makes you feel better, I could go back and change "your" to "ones"..... Maybe Ricky could go back and change 'others' to 'me'. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RupertKBD Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 2 minutes ago, Ricky Ravioli said: Well when you quote me while saying that it doesn't quite come across like that to me but I digress You were the one that asked the question. Who else should I have quoted? And yes, you do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky Ravioli Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 Just now, RupertKBD said: You were the one that asked the question. Who else should I have quoted? And yes, you do. My question was in reference to why he would assume I like Jordan Peterson. Looking back I should have made that more clear but my point still stands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 7 minutes ago, Ricky Ravioli said: My question was in reference to why he would assume I like Jordan Peterson. Looking back I should have made that more clear but my point still stands. Maybe because you raised a cheer to Rob's post referencing Peterson. An assumption on people's part I suppose but that's pretty much what all people do. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky Ravioli Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 4 minutes ago, Satchmo said: Maybe because you raised a cheer to Rob's post referencing Peterson. An assumption on people's part I suppose but that's pretty much what all people do. Fair. I was "cheering" the calling out of the obvious fear mongering in that headline/article but I get that. For the record I'm not a Jordan Peterson "fan" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 21 minutes ago, Ricky Ravioli said: My question was in reference to why he would assume I like Jordan Peterson. Looking back I should have made that more clear but my point still stands. Because of your posting history. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky Ravioli Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 Just now, Bob Long said: Because of your posting history. Huh? Point to where that would show I like him? There is some serious insanity on these boards 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.