Jump to content

Canadian Politics Thread


Sharpshooter

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Wiggums said:

Poiliviere wants to allow more free speech and not allow children to watch porn and people are completely up in arms about it?  Lol

 

 

All of those things being introduced is what caused to divisiveness in the first place.  

 

Children are easily manipulated and the left wants to feed them porn then allow them to decide they're a different sex, all on their own.  Fuckin weird man

 

 

 

I don't want to give a shady porn site my ID. It's up to parents to monitor their children's online experience - I shouldn't have to lose online freedom because bad parents exist.

 

I'm not sure why you think children are deciding they're a different sex. Gender != sex.

Edited by 112
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bob Long said:

 

No wigs, those attempts at division are created by the US right.

 

 

Cool narrative. It's not happening but yet here you are.

 

The left literally created and Invented new terms, new science, new speech we all have to use and if you don't you're a bigot.  People now go around calling anyone who doesn't want to refer to someone as  Optimus Prime a bigot.  This has all been going on since this new progressive left cancer started spreading 5-8 years ago

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Wiggums said:

 

The left literally created and Invented new terms, new science, new speech we all have to use and if you don't you're a bigot.  People now go around calling anyone who doesn't want to refer to someone as  Optimus Prime a bigot.  This has all been going on since this new progressive left cancer started spreading 5-8 years ago

 

Oh, here comes the attack helicopter bit. Lovely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, bishopshodan said:

 

It's mostly on the parents imo. 

 

There is too much wild stuff on the internet...nevermind porn ...that is very, very inappropriate for children.

 

Come on breeders. 

 

There's no way to prevent all access tho. This id thing is just dumb, but worse CPC supporters will think that they actually did something, all the meanwhile not educating kids properly about how to deal with the world.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 112 said:

 

I don't want to give a shady porn site my ID. It's up to parents to monitor their children's online experience - I shouldn't have to lose online freedom because bad parents exist.

 

I'm not sure why you think children are deciding they're a different sex. Gender != sex.

 

I don't agree with it either but to be so mad about it is funny. 

 

Pornographic books in school = good

 

ID for shady porn sites = bad

 

And no, people can't monitor their kids online use 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Wiggums said:

You're glad they are done school already?  You don't say?

 

Wouldn't you have much rather them have grown up in the current school system?  Learning about strap ons and such?

 

Nah....they should learn that with their boyfriends.....

 

Kind of like how you did....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wiggums said:

 

The left literally created and Invented new terms, new science, new speech we all have to use and if you don't you're a bigot.  People now go around calling anyone who doesn't want to refer to someone as  Optimus Prime a bigot.  This has all been going on since this new progressive left cancer started spreading 5-8 years ago

 

It's all the soy. 

 

Softball question for you: does everyone have equal rights in Canada?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RupertKBD said:

 

Nah....they should learn that with their boyfriends.....

 

Kind of like how you did....

 

Imagine if I said this to someone here hahaha

 

I'd never hear the end of it

 

Edited by Wiggums
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wiggums said:

 

I don't agree with it either but to be so mad about it is funny. 

 

Pornographic books in school = good

 

ID for shady porn sites = bad

 

And no, people can't monitor their kids online use 

 

You're burning books now too? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bob Long said:

 

It's all the soy. 

 

Softball question for you: does everyone have equal rights in Canada?

 

The soyboys need to be stopped. Poiliviere is the first step in making sense common again.

 

Why are you asking me a rhetorical question?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Master Mind said:

 

I don't disagree with this.

 

But if porn is inappropriate for children, why not at least make that one thing that's tougher for them to access? Can still look into solutions for all the other inappropriate stuff online. If we know something is inappropriate, I don't think it makes sense to ignore that just because there are other inappropriate things.

I hear ya. 

 

I think porn has age restrictions, like alcohol sites....even FB is supposed to 13 years old.

But there are no real conseqeunces for skirting those restrictions. And how would they really enforce this?

We're in the age of wanting freedoms, but not that kind or this kind...depending on your personal or political beliefs. 

 

Education is the way. Pressure on the parents is what I would like, however that would look.

Not unlike the violent crimes of young offenders these days. When do we start looking at who is raising them, maybe charging the parents?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Wiggums said:

The left literally created and Invented new terms, new science, new speech we all have to use and if you don't you're a bigot.  People now go around calling anyone who doesn't want to refer to someone as  Optimus Prime a bigot.  This has all been going on since this new progressive left cancer started spreading 5-8 years ago

 

I don't think you understand the word "literally".

 

Nobody "invents" science.....and you're not a bigot if you don't use it, you're just ignorant....

  • Huggy Bear 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, 112 said:

 

The courts would shut this down.

Regardless of that, it's absolutely telling and damning that the Conservative leader, a former anti abortionist and "man of god" who eschewed everything he stood for back in or around 2017 is now promoting some strict and severe social policies based on bhis views of morality or at least the views of morality as handed down by the church.

 

It's well and truly telling of how this party will govern and what they might attempt based on these statements

  • Like 1
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Wiggums said:

 

The soyboys need to be stopped. Poiliviere is the first step in making sense common again.

 

Why are you asking me a rhetorical question?

 

 

Can you define 'common sense'?  I'm not sure you and I use the term the same way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Wiggums said:

Poiliviere wants to allow more free speech and not allow children to watch porn and people are completely up in arms about it?  Lol

 

 

All of those things being introduced is what caused to divisiveness in the first place.  

 

Children are easily manipulated and the left wants to feed them porn then allow them to decide they're a different sex, all on their own.  Fuckin weird man

 

 

The right want to ban books and porn and specific histories in canada.

 

But the right is also the party of freedoms?

 

You uh....you don't think these things through before you state them do you?

  • Haha 1
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Warhippy said:

Regardless of that, it's absolutely telling and damning that the Conservative leader, a former anti abortionist and "man of god" who eschewed everything he stood for back in or around 2017 is now promoting some strict and severe social policies based on bhis views of morality or at least the views of morality as handed down by the church.

 

It's well and truly telling of how this party will govern and what they might attempt based on these statements

I agree. And I think the most particularly sickening part of his statements are that trans female inmates should be housed in male prisons. It puts them at risk of extreme (sexual) violence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a question:

 

If the right is so hell-bent on "parent's rights" then why are they wanting the government to step in and keep kids from watching porn? If you want to be involved in your kids' school environment, why do you want someone else to monitor their actions at home?

  • Thanks 1
  • Cheers 1
  • Vintage 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Warhippy said:

The right want to ban books and porn and specific histories in canada.

 

But the right is also the party of freedoms?

 

You uh....you don't think these things through before you state them do you?

 

They are the heroic protectors of our kids, don't you know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Wiggums said:

And no, people can't monitor their kids online use

why?

 

What lazy shit. 

 

My parents could go through my room, confiscate any thing they didnt like, at any time. I would get grounded, lose my allowance, etc...

 

It sucked at times but they were the best parents ever. Helped me become a success. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...