Warhippy Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Just now, ArmchairGM22 said: Yes all PM’s combined you’re welcome to use google to learn second the reckless spending has continued well past Covid so sorry it’s not the win you think it is You’re continuing to show you’re uneducated on facts, go learn some before you debate people. It’s pointless for me to discuss when you’re not aware of facts enjoy the destruction of Canada you’re cheering lol uneducated ok From march 2020 to Aug 2022 all covid related spending was done at the behest of an all party committee. All 4 major parties, Libs, NDP, Cons and Bloc agreed on covid spending totalling in the hundreds of billions Around $360 billion to be exact. ALL parties. Since 2019 Trudeau has been the figurehead of a coalition government. All spending has been done based on a majority representation of the populace by the NDP (kingmakers) and Liberals, so outside of 2015-2019 spending it has not been a "trudeau spending spree" at all as it has been done with 2 to 4 party consent. It's pointless for me to point this out to you though because you're not aware of the facts. Maybe go learn some facts before you debate people before you go showing people how uneducated you are on the facts because those are the facts eCoNoMiX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairGM22 Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Warhippy said: Isn't that ideological training though? Something that the new government will not allow Maybe Economics is ideological to a leftist. To most its actually a science because there are economic facts. It’s not based on feelings facts like govt spending is inflationary inflation is a tax on people as it erodes purchasing power govts don’t give you free things, their paid for by you and your taxes and their inflationary spending inflation is bad things like that Edited June 14 by ArmchairGM22 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairGM22 Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Warhippy said: lol uneducated ok From march 2020 to Aug 2022 all covid related spending was done at the behest of an all party committee. All 4 major parties, Libs, NDP, Cons and Bloc agreed on covid spending totalling in the hundreds of billions Around $360 billion to be exact. ALL parties. Since 2019 Trudeau has been the figurehead of a coalition government. All spending has been done based on a majority representation of the populace by the NDP (kingmakers) and Liberals, so outside of 2015-2019 spending it has not been a "trudeau spending spree" at all as it has been done with 2 to 4 party consent. It's pointless for me to point this out to you though because you're not aware of the facts. Maybe go learn some facts before you debate people before you go showing people how uneducated you are on the facts because those are the facts eCoNoMiX The NDP wants to spend even more than liberals lmao you should just stop your argument that the spending is ok because a bunch of ndp socialists like it is hilarious Edited June 14 by ArmchairGM22 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 5 minutes ago, ArmchairGM22 said: Yes all PM’s combined you’re welcome to use google to learn second the reckless spending has continued well past Covid so sorry it’s not the win you think it is You’re continuing to show you’re uneducated on facts, go learn some before you debate people. It’s pointless for me to discuss when you’re not aware of facts enjoy the destruction of Canada you’re cheering So, if I'm following along correctly you are smarter and richer than all of us and you read all the right things and we read all the wrong things. Is that about right? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Just now, ArmchairGM22 said: The NDP wants to spend even more than liberals lmao you should just stop your argument that the spending is ok because a bunch of ndp socialists like it hilarious So instead of "debating the facts" this is your response. Typical 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairGM22 Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 1 minute ago, Warhippy said: So instead of "debating the facts" this is your response. Typical What facts? That a spending socialist ndp has helped Trudeau keep spending? ya we know that what’s your point? Because they agree basic economic principles won’t hold? lmao 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Just now, ArmchairGM22 said: What facts? That a spending socialist ndp has helped Trudeau keep spending? ya we know that what’s your point? Because they agree basic economic principles won’t hold? lmao lol I pointed out who is or was in charge of spending since 2019 and the $360 billion through covid and all you can say is "soshulist" Grow the fuck up. You're not smart. You're not educated. You want attention and sorry for being stupid enough to give you that when it should have been evident that you have zero interest in actually speaking about anything and instead just coming in, telling everyone how awesome you are how smart you are and how nobody gets it but you. Not interested. Take care champ 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Speaking of Pierre. Fancy this, since we're now listening to Singh and May is wrong. If Singh is now the standard of believability that's not good for Pierre is it? Kind of explains why he doesn't want to actually get clearance to read up on this. Singh says report has troubling details about Conservative Party That would make Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre the only major party leader to refuse to obtain the necessary security clearance to read the report. Conservative foreign affairs critic Michael Chong defended Poilievre's decision Thursday after testifying before a Senate committee. "The leader would not be able to divulge this information to anyone else and therefore would not be able to act on this information," said the MP, who was himself a target of Beijing's foreign interference. "At the end of the day, if members of the House of Commons are knowingly and wittingly assisting foreign states to the detriment of Canada's national interest, to the detriment of the people of Canada, then those individuals need to be held accountable. That's not up for party leaders to decide expulsion." The redacted NSICOP report said foreign actors from India and the People's Republic of China interfered in more than one race for the leadership of the Conservative Party of Canada. The public report does not provide any further information about the nature of the alleged interference, or state which Conservative leadership races were allegedly targeted and when. Singh said Poilievre doesn't want to read a report that contains "serious allegations touching his party." "To me, that disqualifies him as a leader, and I do not buy his phoney excuses," he said. "It is clear that both of them, Justin Trudeau and Pierre Poilievre, want to protect their party rather than defending the country. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairGM22 Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Warhippy said: lol I pointed out who is or was in charge of spending since 2019 and the $360 billion through covid and all you can say is "soshulist" Grow the fuck up. You're not smart. You're not educated. You want attention and sorry for being stupid enough to give you that when it should have been evident that you have zero interest in actually speaking about anything and instead just coming in, telling everyone how awesome you are how smart you are and how nobody gets it but you. Not interested. Take care champ I see economics isn’t something you studied and that’s ok. We all study different things. as I said enjoy Canada in the next 10 years as all that spending destroys a once great country I’m happily leaving and taking my wealth with me later this year. oh and I’m much more educated and smarter in THESE economic issues than you, that I know. but if it makes you feel better to insult and swear at me go for it. My knowledge and confidence isn’t affected by someone getting angry at me for pointing out economy realities. Perhaps direct that anger where it belongs, towards Trudeau. My goodness Edited June 14 by ArmchairGM22 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 2 minutes ago, ArmchairGM22 said: I’m much lore educated and smarter in THESE economic issues than you How can you be so sure? Can you tell us your qualifications and certifications? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairGM22 Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 (edited) 1 minute ago, Satchmo said: How can you be so sure? Can you tell us your qualifications and certifications? I don’t need to and even if I did you’d say it’s a lie but I can tell given the lack of comprehension of what govt spending does to inflation and what inflation does to economies And the fact many of you are trying to defend Trudeau’s economic performance tells me most of you don’t pay your own bills since most of even my most liberal friends who are self sufficient adults are aghast at what the liberal ndp coalition has done to this country good luck! Edited June 14 by ArmchairGM22 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Just now, ArmchairGM22 said: I don’t need to and even if I did you’d say it’s a lie but I can tell given the lack of comprehension of what govt spending does to inflation Oh, ok then. I'll just take your word for it all. Your posts certainly imply a great intelligence. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 And now for the main event: Wiener Wars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 15 minutes ago, ArmchairGM22 said: I see economics isn’t something you studied and that’s ok. We all study different things. as I said enjoy Canada in the next 10 years as all that spending destroys a once great country I’m happily leaving and taking my wealth with me later this year. oh and I’m much more educated and smarter in THESE economic issues than you, that I know. but if it makes you feel better to insult and swear at me go for it. My knowledge and confidence isn’t affected by someone getting angry at me for pointing out economy realities. Perhaps direct that anger where it belongs, towards Trudeau. My goodness Im so much smarter and wealthier than all of you and I need to point that out every chance I get because it's a hockey forum and it matters to tell people how much smarter and wealthier I am than everyone You're fucking 10 ply bud, kick rocks 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairGM22 Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 5 minutes ago, Satchmo said: And now for the main event: Wiener Wars. My wiener is bigger than yours. And so much wealthier and smarter. If you only understood wieners like I understood wieners you'd know this, but since you don't know wieners as intimately as myself you'll just never have the privilege of enjoying it the way i can. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Just now, Warhippy said: My wiener is bigger than yours. And so much wealthier and smarter. If you only understood wieners like I understood wieners you'd know this, but since you don't know wieners as intimately as myself you'll just never have the privilege of enjoying it the way i can. source? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bishopshodan Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 I'm taking all my wieners to a better land. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeyJoeJoeJr. Shabadoo Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 1 hour ago, ArmchairGM22 said: Show me where you sourced his net worth second deflection from the material issues of the liberal govt is not going to change them Wish you the best. I’m moving out of Canada this year and taking my significant net worth with me go take a course in economics and learn where this country is headed or simply use your brain. Does it make sense to keep spending when you’re broke and all your loans and credit cards are maxed out? It all ends the same way. good luck to you all. I’ll enjoy my better life out of Canada 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elias Pettersson Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 2 hours ago, bishopshodan said: I only saw the clip posted. Didn't she make it clear in that to say 'no list of sitting MP's' but talked of a former one, Then went on to say that person should be prosecuted? Maybe I missed something... Can you post the contradiction you speak of? May: “There is no list of MP’s who have shown disloyalty to Canada. So I am very comfortable sitting with my colleagues. I am vastly relieved”. Also May: “The few named people may be compromised. They have been beneficiaries of foreign governments interfering in nomination contests. There are clearly threats to Canadian democracy from foreign governments”. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 10 minutes ago, bishopshodan said: I'm taking all my wieners to a better land. It's called Thailand. We just won't ask questions. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Just now, Elias Pettersson said: May: “There is no list of MP’s who have shown disloyalty to Canada. So I am very comfortable sitting with my colleagues. I am vastly relieved”. Also May: “The few named people may be compromised. They have been beneficiaries of foreign governments interfering in nomination contests. There are clearly threats to Canadian democracy from foreign governments”. 39 minutes ago, Warhippy said: Speaking of Pierre. Fancy this, since we're now listening to Singh and May is wrong. If Singh is now the standard of believability that's not good for Pierre is it? Kind of explains why he doesn't want to actually get clearance to read up on this. Singh says report has troubling details about Conservative Party That would make Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre the only major party leader to refuse to obtain the necessary security clearance to read the report. Conservative foreign affairs critic Michael Chong defended Poilievre's decision Thursday after testifying before a Senate committee. "The leader would not be able to divulge this information to anyone else and therefore would not be able to act on this information," said the MP, who was himself a target of Beijing's foreign interference. "At the end of the day, if members of the House of Commons are knowingly and wittingly assisting foreign states to the detriment of Canada's national interest, to the detriment of the people of Canada, then those individuals need to be held accountable. That's not up for party leaders to decide expulsion." The redacted NSICOP report said foreign actors from India and the People's Republic of China interfered in more than one race for the leadership of the Conservative Party of Canada. The public report does not provide any further information about the nature of the alleged interference, or state which Conservative leadership races were allegedly targeted and when. Singh said Poilievre doesn't want to read a report that contains "serious allegations touching his party." "To me, that disqualifies him as a leader, and I do not buy his phoney excuses," he said. "It is clear that both of them, Justin Trudeau and Pierre Poilievre, want to protect their party rather than defending the country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elias Pettersson Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Warhippy said: Elizabeth May said there is no list of names. None of the current MP’s have done anything wrong. Jagmeet seems to be telling a different story. So who are we supposed to believe? Maybe Tom Mulclair is correct and we should actually wait for a judge to read the report instead of some MP’s who clearly don’t know what the fuck they are talking about and have an extreme bias to this? Edited June 14 by Elias Pettersson 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elias Pettersson Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 (edited) 3 hours ago, JoeyJoeJoeJr. Shabadoo said: 2 days ago you guys were all up in arms because the Liberals all voted to not release the names in the report, but now we should take our time and let the investigation take its course? Anyone else getting dizzy? Maybe because two different party leaders read the same unreacted report and came up with two completely different conclusions? Seems like we probably need someone with higher education levels like a judge who can actually give a fair and unbiased summary of what the report actually says. Edited June 14 by Elias Pettersson 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 6 minutes ago, Elias Pettersson said: Maybe because two different party leaders read the same unreacted report and came up with two completely different conclusions? Seems like we probably need someone with higher education levels like a judge who can actually give a fair and unbiased summary of what the report actually says. They aren't different conclusions. Their statements don't conflict in context. That feeling you're having is knowing Skippy is full of shit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.