ArmchairGM22 Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 2 minutes ago, Satchmo said: JT appointed the head of the commission. Who else should have done that? Here are the members: (point out the woke left wing members if you can) https://publicorderemergencycommission.ca/about/the-commission/#frank-au Maybe the courts matter more than a commission led by the man appointed by a man who’s being told he broke the law? I dunno maybe it’s just my non computer science logic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Just now, ArmchairGM22 said: Maybe the courts matter more than a commission led by the man appointed by a man who’s being told he broke the law? I dunno maybe it’s just my non computer science logic Your first sentence is incomprehensible and has nothing to do with the question asked. Your second sentence is a weak jab at my chosen profession. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairGM22 Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Just now, Satchmo said: Your first sentence is incomprehensible and has nothing to do with the question asked. Your second sentence is a weak jab at my chosen profession. Im sorry you don’t understand the following man accused of breaking law appoints the head of a commission to see if he broke the law is not independent courts are independent beep boop computer floppy disk error beep boop Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeyJoeJoeJr. Shabadoo Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 It's probably best that @Sharpshooter cleans this mess up before one of you fine folks gets caught in the crossfire. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Just now, ArmchairGM22 said: Im sorry you don’t understand the following man accused of breaking law appoints the head of a commission to see if he broke the law is not independent courts are independent beep boop computer floppy disk error beep boop I love any post that ends with beep boop. It was an independent commission. You just don't like the results. beep boop computer floppy disk error beep boop Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairGM22 Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Satchmo said: I love any post that ends with beep boop. It was an independent commission. You just don't like the results. beep boop computer floppy disk error beep boop I respect the courts they are the arbiter of laws not a commission who’s head was appointed by the man who’s been told by the courts he broke the law the fact you think a liberal appointed commission has more authority than the courts is rather disturbing and also the problem in this country the irony of “you just don’t like the result” is only lost on you The view of the courts is the highest law of the land, a commission is not Edited June 14 by ArmchairGM22 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Just now, ArmchairGM22 said: I respect the courts they are the arbiter of laws not a commission who’s head was appointed by the man who’s been told by the courts he broke the law the fact you think a liberal appointed commission has more authority than the courts is rather disturbing and also the problem in this country When did I say that? Another incorrect conclusion on your part it would seem. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satchmo Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 That's it for me. This is not intellectually challenging enough to be any fun. Any one willing to guess we won't be continuing this conversation after sundown this evening? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairGM22 Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Satchmo said: When did I say that? Another incorrect conclusion on your part it would seem. It’s implied in your response If you respected the courts ruling over a non independent “commission” the point would be moot wouldn’t it, and therefore you would not raise it. As you are trying to use it as a defence for Trudy breaking the law, you imply the law wasn’t broken because a non independent commission does not agree with the court’s ruling. by logic it means you believe the non independent commission ruling takes precedence over the courts. which by law, it does not beep boop logic Edited June 14 by ArmchairGM22 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 1 minute ago, ArmchairGM22 said: It’s implied in your response If you respected the courts ruling over a non independent “commission” the point would be moot wouldn’t it beep boop logic I don't think that lower courts should make decisions of national importance. Let's see what the Supreme Court decides rather than placing all our faith in someone ruling on a matter that was above their pay grade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 1 hour ago, ArmchairGM22 said: Saying go troll your uncles is an attack? Oh and heard of Pavlov’s dog? You walked right into a psychological test and failed lol thanks for proving my point you're getting weirder in your old age, Clam. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 19 minutes ago, Satchmo said: That's it for me. This is not intellectually challenging enough to be any fun. bingo. The CPC gang really needs some new material. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 2 hours ago, ArmchairGM22 said: Tell me you don’t understand inflation without telling me you don’t understand inflation oh and his spending spree didn’t stop after covid hey why is inflation coming down? we're still spending. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4petesake Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 1 hour ago, Warhippy said: Home ec, I’m thinking. My god this is painful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6of1_halfdozenofother Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 1 hour ago, DSVII said: 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted June 14 Author Share Posted June 14 2 hours ago, JoeyJoeJoeJr. Shabadoo said: It's probably best that @Sharpshooter cleans this mess up before one of you fine folks gets caught in the crossfire. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RupertKBD Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Gone to that great BADM program in the sky? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted June 14 Author Share Posted June 14 25 minutes ago, RupertKBD said: Gone to that great BADM program in the sky? Wait for it………. ………..…… …….. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Lock Posted June 15 Share Posted June 15 Well I clearly haven't missed much... Armchair starts losing the debate so he has to resort to... somehow not even knowing how to insult another person.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted June 15 Share Posted June 15 12 minutes ago, The Lock said: Well I clearly haven't missed much... Armchair starts losing the debate so he has to resort to... somehow not even knowing how to insult another person.... Clam linguine is a dish best served cold? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bishopshodan Posted June 15 Share Posted June 15 Bananarama 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted June 15 Share Posted June 15 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted June 15 Share Posted June 15 On 6/10/2024 at 8:34 AM, RupertKBD said: Wasn't referring to you mate....cheers. Sorry Rupert. Losing my mind on these things. My bad, cheers. On 6/10/2024 at 9:07 AM, bishopshodan said: I asked.. Why does Lorrie think they wont be prosecuted? I assume by your answer ( that is a a question) that you agree they wont be prosecuted because all those 'in power' will help those that might be guilty? or that all in power are guilty?....am I understanding you? Who is Lorrie? Really who are you posting? some random tweeter jumping to conclusions ? Where is Kanada? Lorrie said... Kanada, not Kanata ( village)...Google says..some lanugages spell it this way ( Kanada)..'German, Afrikaans, Hungarian, and some slavic ones' (Addressing each bolded as 1/2/3) 1) correct on both. Ultimately I think politicians are not worthy of giving the benefit of the doubt - regardless of party. i don't mean this as a partisan statement at all. Both federal & provincial leaders are paid hundred(s) of thousands to managing millions/billions worth of 'portfolios' (tax payer dollars), the incentives are clear, your worth more holding & exploiting that position than we are paying them to do it. Not saying every single move is corrupt or that their aren't some well meaning people (most of the best are at lower levels) but the incentives in gaining/maintaining power are very clear imo 2) he's a writer for the Toronto Sun 3) play on words I suppose. I think we could both agree it's not particularly important (or atleast that's it's a legacy media writer trying to be snappy) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairGM22 Posted June 15 Share Posted June 15 I always enjoy watching the debates in the House of Commons. it truly shows how the liberal party loves to deflect and avoid answering questions here you see a question about the green slush fund scandal where $319 million of taxpayer money was pilfered and the response - screaming about climate change, not the issue at hand our taxpayer dollars at work - just one of many scandals of the Trudeau govt 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairGM22 Posted June 15 Share Posted June 15 15 hours ago, The Lock said: Well I clearly haven't missed much... Armchair starts losing the debate so he has to resort to... somehow not even knowing how to insult another person.... No debate lost please explain to me how the liberal govt has improved the economic lives of Canadians over their period in office When you can’t, you’ll have to accept I won the debate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.