Jump to content

Canadian Politics Thread


Sharpshooter

Recommended Posts

Just now, ArmchairGM22 said:

So the video of an interview of Jagmeet saying it is now not reliable because of blackface? Huh?

 

 

....or maybe it has something to do with the "suspected Sikh terrorist" line. :classic_rolleyes:

 

That basically tells the rest of us everything about where you get your information from. :picard:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Warhippy said:

Fancy that 

 

He doesn't call anyone a traitor.  He outlines what is or would be designated in his opinion traitorous behaviour 

 

Lemme help ya out champ since you only posted the edited short form of that video.

 

You know, the ENTIRE video that doesn't say at all would you claim.

 

This should have been super easy for you and somehow you still managed to prove nothing 

 

https://www.ctvnews.ca/video/c2940704-power-play--one-on-one-with-jagmeet-singh

1:30

 

question to Jagmeet 

 

“you called these people traitors” 

 

knods head repeatedly 

 

And says “sensitive Canadian information was revealed to foreign intelligence officers” and goes on

 

Just stop, You’re making a fool of yourself or are so in denial of reality it’s unbelievable 

Edited by ArmchairGM22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RupertKBD said:

 

....or maybe it has something to do with the "suspected Sikh terrorist" line. :classic_rolleyes:

 

That basically tells the rest of us everything about where you get your information from. :picard:

Or you’re too lazy to watch a video in the link of JAGMEET TALKING ABOUT IT!!

 

Just stop 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ArmchairGM22 said:

I posted it. I hit save before it saved 

 

1:30

 

grow up 

 

 

Semantics.  Singh uses the word traitor yet later says no action should be taken.

 

A traitor is one who betrays trust or someone who commits treason.   People are jumping to the treason aspect while I think the betrayal aspect is more appropriate.

 

That is not to say I side with betrayers or think they should go unpunished, it's just that it does not appear treason (as defined below) has been committed . 

 

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-46.html#:~:text=High treason,any act preparatory thereto%3B or

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ArmchairGM22 said:

So the video of an interview of Jagmeet saying it is now not reliable because of blackface? Huh?

 

The real interview is.

 

The edited video sent from such a ridiculously questionable source sharing the shit that Twitter feed does is not.

 

Just for reference here's some lighter topics screen shot from that Twitter feed.

 

And here's the actual FULL video in it's entirety WITHOUT editing 

 

https://www.ctvnews.ca/video/c2940704-power-play--one-on-one-with-jagmeet-singh

 

Tell me.  Which one of these seems more honest to you?

Screenshot_20240616-114903.png

Screenshot_20240616-114839.png

Screenshot_20240616-114814.png

Screenshot_20240616-114701.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ArmchairGM22 said:

Or you’re too lazy to watch a video in the link of JAGMEET TALKING ABOUT IT!!

 

Just stop 

 

I don't think I will.

 

I think you're full of shit and will continue to point that out....

 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • ThereItIs 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ArmchairGM22 said:

1:30

 

question to Jagmeet 

 

“you called these people traitors” 

 

knods head repeatedly 

 

And says “sensitive Canadian information was revealed to foreign intelligence officers” and goes on

 

Just stop, You’re making a fool of yourself or are so in denial of reality it’s unbelievable 

Lol.

 

He didn't call anyone a traitor he labeled what he called traitorous behaviour 

 

The whole video shows that.  Not your bullshit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Satchmo said:

Semantics.  Singh uses the word traitor yet later says no action should be taken.

 

A traitor is one who betrays trust or someone who commits treason.   People are jumping to the treason aspect while I think the betrayal aspect is more appropriate.

 

That is not to say I side with betrayers or think they should go unpunished, it's just that it does not appear treason (as defined below) has been committed . 

 

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-46.html#:~:text=High treason,any act preparatory thereto%3B or


the reporter literally quotes Singh as says “you called them traitors”

 

Singh proceeds to nod his head repeatedly in agreement and expands on it

 

he does not deny he said that 

he does not correct the report

 

That is called agreement 

 

good luck in life you’re in another world 

Edited by ArmchairGM22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RupertKBD said:

 

I don't think I will.

 

I think you're full of shit and will continue to point that out....

 

 

Fear of the truth emerges now

 

thanks

 

being ignorant of facts is one thing 

choosing to remain ignorant because of fear of those facts is clearly a problem in society 

 

lol you are truly scared of the truth 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ArmchairGM22 said:

you’re in another world 

And thank god for that. 

I'm about to watch the unedited video and will get back to you.  BTW - have you watched it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Satchmo said:

And thank god for that. 

I'm about to watch the unedited video and will get back to you.  BTW - have you watched it?

You know he hasn't and won't.

 

He still hasn't answered me on the two simplest economics questions for any level of economics education which are

 

How is the strength of a nations currency derived

 

And

 

Who sets the price of fuel food housing and energy in Canada.

 

Getting this...type, to answer a question is like getting bettman to admit Arizona didn't work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ArmchairGM22 said:

Fear of the truth emerges now

 

thanks

 

being ignorant of facts is one thing 

choosing to remain ignorant because of fear of those facts is clearly a problem in society 

 

lol you are truly scared of the truth 

 

I don't think you know anything about the truth. In fact, I think your entire shtick here is bullshit...

 

FTR, I don't believe you have a degree in Economics. If you did, you would have had zero trouble answering Hippy's question. I also don't believe you're leaving the country, nor do I believe your claims of significant wealth that will be leaving the country with you....

Edited by RupertKBD
  • Haha 1
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RupertKBD said:

 

I don't think you know anything about the truth. In fact, I think your entire shtick here is bullshit...

 

FTR, I don't believe you have a degree in Economics. If you did, you would have had zero trouble answering Hippy's question. I also don't believe you're leaving the country, nor do I believe your claims of significant wealth that will be leaving the country with you....

Cool

 

it doesn’t change any of the economic realities I’ve posted 

IMG_7950.jpeg

IMG_7953.jpeg

IMG_7949.jpeg

IMG_7948.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JoeyJoeJoeJr. Shabadoo said:

Just got my first PM on CFF. Wonder who it could be? Lol

 

Screenshot_20240616_120101_Samsung Internet.jpg

 

I got one too....Telling me how "crushed" he is....

 

I suppose to point out that he isn't really crushed? :classic_unsure:

 

Oh...and something about Douglas College that didn't make any sense to me....

  • Cheers 1
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ArmchairGM22 said:

Cool

 

it doesn’t change any of the economic realities I’ve posted 

IMG_7950.jpeg

IMG_7953.jpeg

IMG_7949.jpeg

IMG_7948.jpeg

Economic realities.  

 

Posts the same 4 images he's posted for days while claiming he's smarter than everyone towards economics.

 

Funny the one thing they haven't posted is there vaunted economics degree or anything proving they have an actual understanding of even basic economic principles 

 

Wonder why

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ArmchairGM22 said:

Cool

 

it doesn’t change any of the economic realities I’ve posted 

IMG_7950.jpeg

IMG_7953.jpeg

IMG_7949.jpeg

IMG_7948.jpeg

 

Thanks perfesser. We've all seen these....The dozen or so other times you've posted them.

 

Funny thing is, all the real BADM professors that I work with all have original thoughts....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, JoeyJoeJoeJr. Shabadoo said:

Just got my first PM on CFF. Wonder who it could be? Lol

 

Screenshot_20240616_120101_Samsung Internet.jpg

 

5 minutes ago, RupertKBD said:

 

I got one too....Telling me how "crushed" he is....

 

I suppose to point out that he isn't really crushed? :classic_unsure:

 

Oh...and something about Douglas College that didn't make any sense to me....

Omg guys

 

We're in a club!

 

 

Screenshot_20240616-121109.png

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so those aren’t economic realities because I didn’t post my economics degree online?


please go challenge the sources of those pictures then?

 

I’m not the source champ. So you can believe my education or not, but the sources are on those pictures 


Good luck dealing with those economic realities and coping with a conservative landslide 

 

 

IMG_7960.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...