Jump to content

B.C. Politics Thread


Sharpshooter

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Bob Long said:

 

I think there's huge value in discussions around both. 

 

Dunno, my daughter has been out of school for a while now.

Don’t know either. Guessing if one book is being shelved then it’s likely others are too. Sad really. The classics have important value and should be still read by our kids. Add the new ones too. But don’t limit what the kids study. Really don’t want our kids programmed to only see the world from a narrow lens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bob Long said:

 

But that's not what's behind this.

 

Results vs. Reasoning.  Outcome is almost objectively great.  The explanation was just piss-poor.  "We think the new books are better."  That's really all they had to say.

 

5 minutes ago, Alflives said:

Don’t know either. Guessing if one book is being shelved then it’s likely others are too. Sad really. The classics have important value and should be still read by our kids. Add the new ones too. But don’t limit what the kids study. Really don’t want our kids programmed to only see the world from a narrow lens. 

 

Mockingbird was a fine book, but it does have some noticeable flaws.  It's a novel about racism that almost exclusively features white people.  It's a clichéd book written during the Jim Crow Era about a Jim Crow society... from the perspective of a white family.  Tom Robinson is such a minor character in that book - much better to read a book that actually centers around a figure like Robinson.

  • Like 1
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Miss Korea said:

 

Results vs. Reasoning.  Outcome is almost objectively great.  The explanation was just piss-poor.  "We think the new books are better."  That's really all they had to say.

 

 

Mockingbird was a fine book, but it does have some noticeable flaws.  It's a novel about racism that almost exclusively features white people.  It's a clichéd book written during the Jim Crow Era about a Jim Crow society... from the perspective of a white family.  Tom Robinson is such a minor character in that book - much better to read a book that actually centers around a figure like Robinson.

Like I suggest before. Don’t mind new books. But don’t limit our kids’ reading to only one point of view and from one era. Keep the classics too. 
I remember reading the Alkegory of the Cave in school. Very cool stuff. Hopefully our kids get to explore and learn about these classics still. Nothing wrong (IMHAO) with kids reading a variety. Old and new. Bad and good. The world is diverse. 

  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Alflives said:

Like I suggest before. Don’t mind new books. But don’t limit our kids’ reading to only one point of view and from one era. Keep the classics too. 
I remember reading the Alkegory of the Cave in school. Very cool stuff. Hopefully our kids get to explore and learn about these classics still. Nothing wrong (IMHAO) with kids reading a variety. Old and new. Bad and good. The world is diverse. 

 

There are far better books that do a better job of presenting the injustice behind institutional racism.  That's what's at play here.  You can't be arguing for the classics when you've never even heard of the new books replacing it.  You also can't make them read both - there's no time in a classroom setting to read that many novels.

 

Did your curriculum have something like Ivanhoe by Walter Scott?  I don't think so.  But maybe your parents read it.  BC changed their curriculum even when you were growing up.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2024 at 4:19 PM, 6of1_halfdozenofother said:

 

On 2/21/2024 at 4:49 PM, Bob Long said:

 

thats a relief. It was looking to me like another Victoria museum debacle but on a provincial scale. 

 

 

On 2/21/2024 at 5:07 PM, King Heffy said:

I definitely appreciate this government's ability to listen to feedback and change course when necessary.

 

On 2/21/2024 at 5:18 PM, Bob Long said:

 

Yep in this case for sure.

 

I do think that this was bubbling up as a major election issue which I suspect a big part of the walk back. Might be too late in some rural areas tho 

 

The only reason they walked this back is because it's an election year. If they win the coming election it will be back.

 

I've never been very impressed with any iteration of BC's government (in my adult life anyways), but as someone who lives in rural BC the NDP getting another term terrifies me... for stuff like this specifically. Two years ago the NDP basically shut my entire region out of moose hunting - something the indigenous population actually spoke against - despite the fact that over 90% of the feedback was against this move (I talked to the bureaucrat who was overseeing the feedback) . They don't listen to people in Rural communities and it's incredibly frustrating. 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dizzle said:

 

 

 

 

The only reason they walked this back is because it's an election year. If they win the coming election it will be back.

 

I've never been very impressed with any iteration of BC's government (in my adult life anyways), but as someone who lives in rural BC the NDP getting another term terrifies me... for stuff like this specifically. Two years ago the NDP basically shut my entire region out of moose hunting - something the indigenous population actually spoke against - despite the fact that over 90% of the feedback was against this move (I talked to the bureaucrat who was overseeing the feedback) . They don't listen to people in Rural communities and it's incredibly frustrating. 

 

I think the BC conservatives are going to do quite well in rural areas 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bob Long said:

 

From the news, sounds like fear 

There is an odd mention of fear in the article I posted but if I was to try to label it I might use 'overzealous'.  And mostly harmless.

 

Anyway, this is not likely worth the time we've put into it.   Let's disagree to agree on this one.

  • ThereItIs 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Satchmo said:

There is an odd mention of fear in the article I posted but if I was to try to label it I might use 'overzealous'.  And mostly harmless.

 

Anyway, this is not likely worth the time we've put into it.   Let's disagree to agree on this one.

 

I just see a lost learning opportunity 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Bob Long said:

 

I think the BC conservatives are going to do quite well in rural areas 

Not if their fearless leader comes up with zingers like he did addressing the school shortages in Surrey. He's as laughable as Falcon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Johngould21 said:

Not if their fearless leader comes up with zingers like he did addressing the school shortages in Surrey. He's as laughable as Falcon.

 

I think a lot of people don't care about zingers, they do care about land use issues tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bob Long said:

 

What in particular? I'm not being snarky, genuinely curious.

 

They seem serious when looking at housing and development, plus trades schooling investments. 

My nephew works for a big developer and they claim the NDP has been the best to work with. 

Edited by bishopshodan
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bishopshodan said:

 

They seem serious when looking at housing and development, plus trades schooling investments. 

My nephew works for a big developer and they claim the NDP has been the best to work with. 

 

yea the new 2 billion pumped into housing by the feds should go a long way into that 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bob Long said:

 

yea the new 2 billion pumped into housing by the feds should go a long way into that 

Yup..BC Build.

 

I liked that they did the rezoning thingy too..is that Bill44? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Bob Long said:

 

What in particular? I'm not being snarky, genuinely curious.

Undoing the outsourcing in hospitals, giving the pay increase for family doctors, crackdown on AirBNB and forcing municipalities to fix zoning to allow more densitiy are all winners for me.

Edited by King Heffy
  • Cheers 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, bishopshodan said:

Yup..BC Build.

 

I liked that they did the rezoning thingy too..is that Bill44? 

 

not sure, I do give Sim more credit for that (he did light that fire as part of his platform). 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, King Heffy said:

Undoing the outsourcing in hospitals, giving the pay increase for family doctors, crackdown on AirBNB and forcing municipalities to fix zoning to allow more densitiy are all winners for me.

 

there's a lot of structural problems in healthcare tho, that they haven't done much about in the hospital system and how our HA's are organized. Its still a lot of pigs at the admin trough. 

 

Vancouver only had a good zoning plan once they bounced that clown Kennedy Stewart. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bob Long said:

 

there's a lot of structural problems in healthcare tho, that they haven't done much about in the hospital system and how our HA's are organized. Its still a lot of pigs at the admin trough. 

 

Vancouver only had a good zoning plan once they bounced that clown Kennedy Stewart. 

May not be perfect but the other parties seem determined to destroy healthcare in BC every time they get in office with privatization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, King Heffy said:

May not be perfect but the other parties seem determined to destroy healthcare in BC every time they get in office with privatization.

 

I think its fair to be critical of the NDP on their own merit though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bob Long said:

 

I think its fair to be critical of the NDP on their own merit though. 

I'm not particularly happy about the lack of action against the money laundering in casinos, but overall they haven't done anything that I take issue with.  I'd rather be angry about good things a government hasn't done instead of bad things a government did do.

  • Cheers 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...