B.C. Politics Thread

[Bob Long]

1 minute ago, King Heffy said:

At some point, taking their children away from them needs to be an option if they can't cut out the bigotry.  These are the people who shouldn't be allowed near kids, let alone be responsible for their welfare.

 

they just need to leave others alone. But they seem entitled and think they can force their preferred way of life on everyone else. 

[Bob Long]

Just now, Alflives said:

And we need these laws because of parents teaching their children hate and intolerance. It’s a sick cycle of hatred. 

 

I guess they seem to think that a conservative government will do unconstitutional things for them. 

 

Where did they ever get this idea from?

 

[Alflives]

4 minutes ago, Bob Long said:

 

I guess they seem to think that a conservative government will do unconstitutional things for them. 

 

Where did they ever get this idea from?

 

Maybe it’s the moran thinking bleeding across the border? 

[Canadian_Kanga]

Lovely day for it.

[chris12345]

30 minutes ago, King Heffy said:

As long as the parts that need to be covered are covered, it's none of my business what other people wear.

Who defines what needs to be covered? 

 

I'm ok with a lotta cleav.

[Breadnbutta]

39 minutes ago, Alflives said:

A rainbow and a big purple hippo. What’s wrong? 

Read the poster

[Alflives]

Just now, Breadnbutta said:

Read the poster

The words are too small. 

[Breadnbutta]

1 minute ago, Alflives said:

The words are too small. 

Use the zoom feature big guy.

 

Anyway I've said my pieces

 

Disagreeing on this controversial topic is not hatred and bigotry. Both my children are very kind and respectful.

 

But this is what the left does, vilify the right to sway centrists.

 

Vote for common sense. I'm done lurking this sub. Back to canucks talk.

[Bob Long]

24 minutes ago, chris12345 said:

Who defines what needs to be covered? 

 

I'm ok with a lotta cleav.

 

[Bob Long]

26 minutes ago, Alflives said:

Maybe it’s the moran thinking bleeding across the border? 

 

for sure. "I have a Facebook friend that [fill in issue of the day]" is something we inherited from the GOP Karen brigade. 

 

Edited Sunday at 05:15 PM by Bob Long

[Bob Long]

9 minutes ago, Breadnbutta said:

Read the poster

 

whats unconstitutional about it? 

[Breadnbutta]

6 minutes ago, Bob Long said:

 

whats unconstitutional about it? 

You don't find that inappropriate for 11 year Olds?

 

Lol wow

[Bob Long]

Just now, Breadnbutta said:

You don't find that inappropriate for 11 year Olds?

 

Lol wow

 

answer the question. Whats unconstitutional about it? 

[4petesake]

1 hour ago, Bob Long said:

 

it moved? 

 

 

[Breadnbutta]

7 minutes ago, Bob Long said:

 

answer the question. Whats unconstitutional about it? 

I don't care about the constitution.

 

I care about groomers teaching children and how ass backwards this world is now.

 

We have gone way too far the other way. Change was needed from the old days of dad beating his kids and smoking darts inside restaurants being the norm. but we have gone way too far the other way.

 

In my opinion.

[Satchmo]

6 minutes ago, Breadnbutta said:

I don't care about the constitution.

 

I care about groomers teaching children and how ass backwards this world is now.

 

We have gone way too far the other way. Change was needed from the old days of dad beating his kids and smoking darts inside restaurants being the norm. but we have gone way too far the other way.

 

In my opinion.

Not all conservatives are racists and anti-vaxxers (we have been told) yet all gay men are groomers.   That's just how ass backwards the world is now.

 

I had two gay men as high school teachers.  One for Art and another for English. It's a marvel how I managed to maintain my attraction to women and father two kids.

[Bob Long]

13 minutes ago, Breadnbutta said:

I don't care about the constitution.

 

I care about groomers teaching children and how ass backwards this world is now.

 

We have gone way too far the other way. Change was needed from the old days of dad beating his kids and smoking darts inside restaurants being the norm. but we have gone way too far the other way.

 

In my opinion.

 

Well if nothing else you are honest.

 

You are trying to force your unconstitutional ideas on others. You are the problem.

 

If it bothers you so much, you have the legal right to homeschool.

 

You are the one trying to infringe on others rights. Making up Facebook Boogeyman stories doesn't provide you with any rights.

 

[Warhippy]

2 hours ago, Breadnbutta said:

My son goes there and it obviously makes a lot of parents uncomfortable cause it gets mentioned often and there is anti sogi rallies outside here and there.... so it's not another city lol.... this forum isn't only vancouver proper...

 

I live in the Okanagan and have donated hundreds of hours to volunteering for my daughters over the years.

 

Again, what exactly does a man wearing hells, a skirt or a dress have to do with your life that somehow is so reprehensibly awful that you need to make the comments you have and have the attitude towards it you do without being utterly misinformed or completely just an awful person?

 

Also, in your OWN words, what does SOGI mean to you?  What about it is bad?  How does it differ from us learning about BJs and sex and condoms and the like in school sex ed classes?

Edited Sunday at 06:52 PM by Warhippy

[Warhippy]

2 hours ago, Breadnbutta said:

 

I'm not going to post pictures of him as I don't think that's appropriate for him. But this was a poster on the other side of his door, behind the pride flag.

 

Why did he feel the need to describe what he's attracted to physically to grade 6 kids?

 

A bunch of parents complained and he had to take this down. According to my son he let's kids play video games in his class at lunch. He doesn't really help educationally. He's just there as a diversity hire in My opinion.

 

 

I don't think this would fly in a conservative government. If one school in the Bible belt allows it, then I'm sure many others do.

 

This was posted to a private facebook group with parents from the school, it was not my post nor did i take photos of him or his class.

 

OK, so what exactly about this is bad?  Honestly?

 

Are you positive they were telling kids what they're attracted to or were they just educating kids about something that their parents are endlessly fetishizing about?

 

Just again, in your own words what about any of this is bad?  

 

Im in my 40s and I remember this crap about a gay teacher at my high school and how a few dads had such issue with him being gay and existing that they felt the need to protest in the school hallway about it.

 

We're over 25 years on from that but how does this differ?

[Warhippy]

1 hour ago, Breadnbutta said:

Use the zoom feature big guy.

 

Anyway I've said my pieces

 

Disagreeing on this controversial topic is not hatred and bigotry. Both my children are very kind and respectful.

 

But this is what the left does, vilify the right to sway centrists.

 

Vote for common sense. I'm done lurking this sub. Back to canucks talk.

We're not making any mention of your kids we're asking you how this affects you or their school experience at all.

 

As for common sense, you're making a MAJOR part of what you're voting on or about or who you're voting for this issue.  A gd man wearing a dress in school is what you're voting for.  Your candidate could be one of the parties individuals that is a repugnant PoS with some truly reprehensible views and social media comments about race, colour, gender or orientation with zero plan on how to fix the real issues but because a man wears a dress in a school, is NOT actually an educator (in your words) and this is a major part of why you're voting conservative.

 

Common sense you say.....

[Warhippy]

1 hour ago, Breadnbutta said:

You don't find that inappropriate for 11 year Olds?

 

Lol wow

In grade 5 at 10 years old in the super early 90s we learned about sex.  BJs.  Anal penetration.  Sex between two men and two women.  We learned about STDs.  Infidelity and cheating.  We learned how to put a condom on and how babies were made.  ALL in sex ed.

 

Why are we now redefining what is or is not appropriate for 11 year olds because when 10 year old Mark Wiehler asked if you get poop on your pee pee if you butt love a person or if a condom gets stuck inside a bum and if the person poops it out if the poop gets stuck inside like a sausage casing, I was not ready for that.

 

So what is inappropriate about this vs that?

[Warhippy]

1 hour ago, Breadnbutta said:

I don't care about the constitution.

 

I care about groomers teaching children

Yes we get your opinion.  it speaks volumes.

 

So to the bolded.

 

1.  No you don't.  Like at all.  You only care about the parts you can apply to your opinion.

 

2.  What is grooming?  Educating kids about the world?  Or telling kids who to hate based on how they look, how they identify, who they love or what they believe in?  Because children don't actually give a crap about that stuff like at all, especially in a day and age of the internet where they can as 10 year old boys look up 2 midgets getting savaged by 9 large african americans and a jar of baby oil on any pornographic website they want while still alt tabbed in to minecraft or roblox.

 

So....

[NewbieCanuckFan]

18 minutes ago, Warhippy said:

Yes we get your opinion.  it speaks volumes.

 

So to the bolded.

 

1.  No you don't.  Like at all.  You only care about the parts you can apply to your opinion.

 

2.  What is grooming?  Educating kids about the world?  Or telling kids who to hate based on how they look, how they identify, who they love or what they believe in?  Because children don't actually give a crap about that stuff like at all, especially in a day and age of the internet where they can as 10 year old boys look up 2 midgets getting savaged by 9 large african americans and a jar of baby oil on any pornographic website they want while still alt tabbed in to minecraft or roblox.

 

So....

One small step removed from being against having teachers of a certain religion.  Oh Jebus, they'll indoctrinate my child into their religion.

 

To be fair, that's what the Residential School system did try to do by design leading to disastrous results.  All in the name of being good Ned Flanders.

[Warhippy]

5 minutes ago, NewbieCanuckFan said:

One small step removed from being against having teachers of a certain religion.  Oh Jebus, they'll indoctrinate my child into their religion.

 

To be fair, that's what the Residential School system did try to do by design leading to disastrous results.  All in the name of being good Ned Flanders.

Every time someone mentions "grooming kids" it is usually on the backs of disturbing behaviour and actions towards minorities and leaves me questioning what level of grooming towards this kind of intolerance is happening in the house of that child.

[Breadnbutta]

1 hour ago, Warhippy said:

We're not making any mention of your kids we're asking you how this affects you or their school experience at all.

 

As for common sense, you're making a MAJOR part of what you're voting on or about or who you're voting for this issue.  A gd man wearing a dress in school is what you're voting for.  Your candidate could be one of the parties individuals that is a repugnant PoS with some truly reprehensible views and social media comments about race, colour, gender or orientation with zero plan on how to fix the real issues but because a man wears a dress in a school, is NOT actually an educator (in your words) and this is a major part of why you're voting conservative.

 

Common sense you say.....

That was just one reason.

 

I mentioned in a previous post about the ndp presence in the interior, how they handled the forest fires and how they treat farmers.

 

Their entire platform is pathetic. Authoritarian and infringes on human rights.