Jump to content

[Signing] Daniel Sprong to the Canucks


Recommended Posts

it sounds like a few things that support how awesome, detailed and accurate our pro scouting is:

 

Sprong - trending up past 2 seasons playing good hockey

- high shot volume player (what did we lack in playoffs...shots shots shots)

- speed - coaching and management said we need more of 

-transition play - we lack this- spring has scored a to of goals off the transition

- motivated and hungry and set up for a break out year 

 

... sound familiar - Joshua, Heiden, DeBrusk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Coconuts said:

 

Puts a bit of a damper on the whole him not being a Tochett player bit

agree, it sounds like he has just been trying to up his value based on points and so maybe developed a bad rap

now it sounds like they just want him to relax into a good situation and use his speed and transition game to help generate shots and that he will play with a defensively reliable C and try to just be a bit more solid omg the D side 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a package could be made to trade some of our extra defenseman, like Woo Wolanin and Brisboise. Add a Aman or PDG.

Get a 3rd for one each of a dman and a forward.

Great depth for some teams. 

Move some extra contracts out. 

Making room for when Poolman's contract goes to ltir. 

Get a lower cost yet effective blueliner.

Or as part of a trade?

 

ps fk Benning fk Gillis fk OEL  fk Messier and fk Green.

 

 

 

Edited by Hairy Kneel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hairy Kneel said:

I think a package could be made to trade some of our extra defenseman, like Woo Wolanin and Brisboise. Add a Aman or PDG.

Get a 3rd for one each of a dman and a forward.

Great depth for some teams. 

Move some extra contracts out. 

Making room for when Poolman's contract goes to ltir. 

Get a lower cost yet effective blueliner.

Or as part of a trade?

 

ps fk Benning fk Gillis fk OEL  fk Messier and fk Green.

 

 

 

Did you forget someone as AntonyG????

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s nice to hear his side of things.  Not getting a decent contract despite putting up numbers seems to have sent the right message to him - and he appears to be on board to work with Tocchet to shore up that side of his game.  
 

Tocc had no problem running managment’s prize signing in Kuz out of town - and it’s nice to know coach and GM are on the same page.  Bodes well for getting a career year out of Sprong.

Edited by The Duke
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, wai_lai416 said:

what are you talking about.. garland literally started the season with kuzmenko and Pettersson.. coz mikheyev was injured 

for four games

 

 

yeeeesh

 

whatever

Edited by deepbluefunk
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully we get the Sprong who understands his next stop will be the KHL if he doesn't buy into systems. It's obvious points aren't the problem or he would have been signed on the first day of FA for 3+m. 

 

 

 

  • Cheers 1
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always liked the idea of Sprong. His defensive issues are well known but there's something to be said about being able to produce at the NHL level with little to no ice time. If he's half as committed to the defensive side, and even being more active on the forecheck, as he says. This may be a pretty big steal of a contract. Even if just for one year.

  • Cheers 1
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out:

Kuzmenko (22)

Beauvellier (5)

Lafferty (13)

Milky (11)

 

In:

Debrusk (19)

Heinen (18)

Sherwood (10)

Sprong (17)

= faster, tougher, more goals, overall better defensively  (plus all these guys coming in have something to prove, arguably hungrier)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

a lot of options

 

 

DeBrusk Petey Sprong

Hogz Miller Boesser

Joshua Bluegger Garland 

Heinen Suter Sherwood 

 

Podz Aman PDG

 

Thats two  first lines and two third lines

 

probably the deepest forward group in the NHL 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, -dlc- said:

Just saw an interview with him on Global news. Will work on the defensive side of things, is excited to be here.

 

Has been in touch with Petey (met on vacation?). Knows Debrusk. Soucy.

 

Think we have a(nother) winner here.

Hmmm....methinks PA sort of knows what he's doing?

  • Like 1
  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hammertime said:

Hopefully we get the Sprong who understands his next stop will be the KHL if he doesn't buy into systems. It's obvious points aren't the problem or he would have been signed on the first day of FA for 3+m. 

 

 

 

That’s what I was trying to say. Could get cut from the team for all we know lol. But I hope he does well and comes ready for camp. We do need him to be a top 6 forward 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Bob Long said:

 

I wonder if something is cooking on moving Garland? Sprong can replace his offence but sucks defensively, at least up to now. Maybe Tocc can simplify things for him like with Myers?

 

Freeing up Garlands cap makes a lot of other significant moves possible for another top 6 or top 4 d.

 

 

 

Zero chance they put all that work to keep the best 3rd line in the league together just to move out 1/3rd and the best player on said line. The logic just makes no sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously great signing, having a 10-20 goal scorer, 40 point scorer for under a mil is outrageous considering Garland isn't much better and costs 5 times as much.

 

Rick's going to have a lot of options and obviously blend our lines throughout the year, but here's a nice example of a lineup:
 

Heinen - Miller - Boeser

DeBrusk - Pettersson - Hoglander

Joshua - Blueger - Garland

Sherwood - Suter - Sprong

Podkolzin

PDG

 

That's some unreal depth there. Exciting to have such a deep forward group which was our weakness in the last playoffs. Our defence is going to suck but maybe the coaching staff will use the forwards more defensively (tighter gaps, helping out more tracking back) to support them. Having 40 point scorers on your 4th line is pretty wild, along with one of the best chemistry 3rd lines in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said:

3 guarantees in life now, death, taxes and Anthony defending Jimbo to the death in every trade thread. 

Well, you were one of those defending Jimbo back in the days when I was in the same position as Anthony is now.

I was blocked, picked on etc… 

 

But I talked about how bad Benning was.

 

Do you understand nowadays what I was talking about back then? 
Or is your mind still stuck with Dahlen? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...