canucks curse Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 25 minutes ago, elvis15 said: I know they had concerns over him putting it together mentally (Tocchet mentioned him overthinking his play and that getting in the way), but this still feels like an odd deal. The return isn't that much and a lot of us thought he might get a serious shot in camp this year. I guess re-signing some key players and bringing in a few new guys made it a little crowded. funny.... that was the knock on him in his draft year, but yet we took him ahead of boldy and caulfield 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viking Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 4 minutes ago, Captain insano said: Podkolzin is a 23 year old who was on pace to have 0 goals and 9 assists through 82 games last year he was .6ppg at the ahl level well getting lots of pp1 time, I honestly don’t understand why everyone is so upset he’s clearly not nhl caliber and let’s say he does find a home it’s going to be 4th line duty….. relax it was a horrible use of that draft pick new regime is fixing us slowly and also creating cap space clearing 1m by losing a former 10th overall pick is tough tho...why not include him in Mikheyev deal, or did that russian interview seal his fate and Management said fuck it 1st offer he's out of town! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4petesake Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 11 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said: Edmonton also thinks a rape apologist who destroyed the Blackhawk dynasty team was a good hire too, so there’s that. Thanks, another reason for me to not like the trade…helping said rape apologist save face for his shitty handling of his cap and RFA signings by letting him say Holloway and a 4th for Podz and a 3rd for the same cap hit isn’t a bad trade-off. To be clear I don’t care about trading Podz or the return. Unless there’s more to the trade I’d rather have no part of helping him and the oil out of a tight spot. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viking Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 Just now, canucks curse said: funny.... that was the knock on him in his draft year, but yet we took him ahead of boldy and caulfield Yup, its pretty simple Canucks are terrible at drafting, so many misses we jsut sadly never got gifted a 97 or 34...to make the team relevant even with all the other bad trades, signings and draft picks... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks curse Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 3 minutes ago, Viking said: clearing 1m by losing a former 10th overall pick is tough tho...why not include him in Mikheyev deal, or did that russian interview seal his fate and Management said fuck it 1st offer he's out of town! yeah but he sucked 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck You Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 5 minutes ago, Viking said: clearing 1m by losing a former 10th overall pick is tough tho...why not include him in Mikheyev deal, or did that russian interview seal his fate and Management said fuck it 1st offer he's out of town! What interview and what he say? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 4 minutes ago, 4petesake said: Thanks, another reason for me to not like the trade…helping said rape apologist save face for his shitty handling of his cap and RFA signings by letting him say Holloway and a 4th for Podz and a 3rd for the same cap hit isn’t a bad trade-off. To be clear I don’t care about trading Podz or the return. Unless there’s more to the trade I’d rather have no part of helping him and the oil out of a tight spot. This doesn’t help them or move the needle, at all. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaBamba Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 26 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said: CFF/CDC always over-values our own players, and under-values everyone else's. 0G and 2A in 19 games is going to be hard to replace. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 2 minutes ago, canucks curse said: yeah but he sucked You can only live off of 10th overall pick for so long. Draft +5/6 nah you’re just a replacement player/plug by now 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integra250 Posted August 19 Author Share Posted August 19 5 minutes ago, Viking said: Yup, its pretty simple Canucks are terrible at drafting, so many misses we jsut sadly never got gifted a 97 or 34...to make the team relevant even with all the other bad trades, signings and draft picks... We were gifted #43, you know, the best defenseman in the league last season, and may arguably be top 10 all time by the time he retires. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshua.Guy Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 Just making room for Klimovich, right? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Crossbar Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 2 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said: This doesn’t help them or move the needle, at all. It moves people to tears. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCupSyndrome Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 17 minutes ago, Integra250 said: Heinen Miller Boeser Debrusk Pettersson Sprong Joshua Blueger Garland Hoglander Suter Sherwood Extras: PDG, Bains, Karlsson, Raty, Lekkerimaki… Simply put, he isn’t likely to win a roster spot. Asset management rather than lost him for nothing on waivers (potentially). Wouldn’t be surprised if he wanted out as well since all his countrymen are gone. I think you might be right. Weird timing so I wonder if he and Millstein saw the additional moves made by Mgmt and quietly asked for a change of scenery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 I've liked most of their moves thus far, this one is a bit of a headscratcher though 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 1 minute ago, Dr. Crossbar said: It moves people to tears. Could you imagine how long it would take to recover if we traded a player like Hunter Shinkaruk? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bure10Kuzmenko96 Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 1 hour ago, SilentSam said: I thought Broberg had gone to St Louis already lol If Tuesday is the deadline for EDM/ Broberg to sign , then yes … it sounds complicated though. We’d have to get his rights in the next 48 hrs, unless the discussions have been allowed by Edm. Personaly I think Broberg would rather be on this Coast where he was recently fishing, than in Louis. Podz for a 4th only feels a bit odd. Edmonton can't trade Broberg or Holloway to any team. They must match the offer sheets or walk away. If they match the Oilers can't trade them for a year and if St. Louis gets them then they can't trade them for a year 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 Just now, Coconuts said: I've liked most of their moves thus far, this one is a bit of a headscratcher though Might as well get a pick instead of losing him to waivers 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 (edited) 2 hours ago, SilentSam said: I thought Broberg had gone to St Louis already lol If Tuesday is the deadline for EDM/ Broberg to sign , then yes … it sounds complicated though. We’d have to get his rights in the next 48 hrs, unless the discussions have been allowed by Edm. Personaly I think Broberg would rather be on this Coast where he was recently fishing, than in Louis. Podz for a 4th only feels a bit odd. Now that the offer sheets are signed neither player can be traded, not now and not for one calendar year from decision time. correction St Lou can still trade them. Edited August 19 by canuck73_3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Crossbar Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 2 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said: Could you imagine how long it would take to recover if we traded a player like Hunter Shinkaruk? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJC Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 1 hour ago, Viking said: should've traded Suter instead and kept out hope Podz could put it together...UnFUCKinBelieveable... Bad idea. Weaken the team based on hope? Cup contenders don’t pull shit like that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Lamora Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 35 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said: CFF/CDC always over-values our own players, and under-values everyone else's. There is something to this, but apart from a few pathological homers on this forum, it’s no different than any other fan base. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 (edited) 8 minutes ago, RWJC said: Bad idea. Weaken the team based on hope? Cup contenders don’t pull shit like that. Yikes yeah, don’t know how anyone could suggest trading Suter over Podkolzin adding that Suter can also play C and is a very solid defensive player. Not to mention good shootout player too. Edited August 19 by canuck73_3 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 5 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said: Might as well get a pick instead of losing him to waivers I get that, but I dunno. Edmonton? Yeah, not thrilled even if Podz needed a fresh start elsewhere. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 5 minutes ago, Coconuts said: I've liked most of their moves thus far, this one is a bit of a headscratcher though I would have preferred a hockey trade, maybe for a prospect d. Well as the man said, it is what it is. If nothing else, management is clearly not willing to diddle around in camp to see who might fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJC Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 3 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said: Yikes yeah, donmt onow how anyone could suggest trading Suter over Podkolzin adding that Suter can also play C and is a very solid defensive player. Not to mention good shootout player too. Totally. Value player for the $ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.