Jump to content

(Trade) Podkolzin to Edmonton


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, tas said:

I don't really view last season as a breakout year for hoglander. it was like, good rookie year, 2 years of regression, and then finally back to where he was as a rookie. 

 

it was a back on track year, not a breakout year imo. 

Hogs is a more well rounded player now.  Much better defensively (he was poor) , and decent numbers offensively.  This could very well have been Podz as well.... back to is rookie numbers with a solid all around game and learning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hogs and Podz said:

Hogs is a more well rounded player now.  Much better defensively (he was poor) , and decent numbers offensively.  This could very well have been Podz as well.... back to is rookie numbers with a solid all around game and learning. 

the canucks don't have room for another project. with debrusk and heinen coming in and lekkerimaki not far off, hoglander better be looking over his shoulder as it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hoglander in front of the net. When was Podkolzin ever this determined in his life?  Maybe at times during his rookie year, maybe.  This is the 4th line dominating because of Hoglander.  (line change 30 seconds in)

 

Edited by Pure961089
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This time last year Podz publicly stated he'd have a "big season" in his own words last summer.

 

https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/podkolzin-promises-big-season-canucks

 

Fast forward one year and Podz recently said in an interview that he needed more "playing time" and "trust" this coming season.

 

https://www.canucksdaily.com/nhl-team/vancouver-canucks/vasily-podkolzin-blames-the-canucks-for-his-late-development

 

 

 

  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pure961089 said:

Hoglander in front of the net. When was Podkolzin ever this determined in his life?  Maybe at times during his rookie year, maybe.  This is the 4th line dominating because of Hoglander.

 

too bad he looks completely lost in the top 6. 

 

if this guy could kill penalties or be a powerplay specialist it'd be a different story, but as it stands he's just a worse garland and there's only room for one player like that at most. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tas said:

too bad he looks completely lost in the top 6. 

 

if this guy could kill penalties or be a powerplay specialist it'd be a different story, but as it stands he's just a worse garland and there's only room for one player like that at most. 

His value is on the 4th line and its the reason the Canucks could roll 4 dangerous lines. The reason we are such a good team.  And people are gonna say they faded down the stretch, like Petey dried up but I have my theories on what happened there.  I think when Demko is healthy the Canucks are the best team in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, tas said:

too bad he looks completely lost in the top 6. 

 

if this guy could kill penalties or be a powerplay specialist it'd be a different story, but as it stands he's just a worse garland and there's only room for one player like that at most. 

I agree, he's not guaranteed anything yet. That's why I suggested trading Hogs for a higher pick and or younger prospect with upside and giving Podz, whom has those skill sets more tailored to the team needs (power forward thats responsible defensively) possibly pk specialist.  Regardless, I sure hope Alvin and co know what they're doing. 

Edited by Hogs and Podz
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IBatch said:

Not true.  EP was demoted to the third line for a spell, Green/Bruce's first year.   He also played with JT Miller and Horvat.  Brass was patient with him as well, waiting for his KHL contract to be finished.   EP centered Hogs and Podz under Bruce to get EP going.  

and neither of them played well.. ahl wise they are on a very similar ppg basis and podz came off the horrific injury. i don't think hoglander outplayed podz in the preseason and tbh i don't think podz is a worse option than PDG on that top line with miller.. sure he hasn't earned it.. but neither did pdg

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, GrammaInTheTub said:

Other players dealt with major life changes adjusting to pro life as well and did okay. Acknowledge the concussion is a significant variable of his though. I’d have been okay giving him another year to piece it together, but that’s not what happened so we all just have to hope this doesn’t burn us. 

Yup dont want him pulling a similar development path to another Russian winger taken 10th overall like Nichushkin...Could possible get an opportunity to play with an elite player like Draisatl or McDavid like Nuke did when joining Colorado, that would suck! Cause we know 98% chance that 4th rd pick won't play as many NHL games for Vancouver as Podkolzin even did

  • ThereItIs 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Pure961089 said:

His value is on the 4th line and its the reason the Canucks could roll 4 dangerous lines. The reason we are such a good team.  And people are gonna say they faded down the stretch, like Petey dried up but I have my theories on what happened there.  I think when Demko is healthy the Canucks are the best team in the league.

I agree I prefer hoglander driving a bottom 6 line. but I also want my bottom 6 guys killing penalties. 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RomanPer said:

Finally. Wanted to see this putin lover gone for a while. Really don't care what the return was. And before you ask "why do you assume he's putin lover?" - I don't assume, I know. He openly supports the war in Ukraine (within the team locker room) and calls Ukrainians "khokhols" (which is a derogatory term for Ukrainians in russian language).

 

Oof. That's disappointing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tas said:

I agree I prefer hoglander driving a bottom 6 line. but I also want my bottom 6 guys killing penalties. 

It’s interesting to see the blade cut both ways with Hoglander. 
 

24 goals purely 5v5 on the 4th line in limited minutes is impressive. If he was feasting on other opponents bottom lines then how come no other 4th liners put up numbers like him? Then PP or PK time becomes a knock because he has a little less perceived versatility - though I’d argue it’s simply that we have players better suited for those minutes and it needn’t be knock on his play. Or it could signal one-dimensional play. Who knows?!

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tas said:

I agree I prefer hoglander driving a bottom 6 line. but I also want my bottom 6 guys killing penalties. 

where on bottom 6?  take Sherwoods spot?  Suter? Heinen?  No, the team has progressed to the point that unless they break up the '3rd line' and have Hogs take over DT's spot or Garly, there's no room for Hogs.... unless of course, he can stick to JT's or Petey's line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Hogs and Podz said:

where on bottom 6?  take Sherwoods spot?  Suter? Heinen?  No, the team has progressed to the point that unless they break up the '3rd line' and have Hogs take over DT's spot or Garly, there's no room for Hogs.... unless of course, he can stick to JT's or Petey's line. 

preaching to the choir. I've been pushing hoglander to anaheim for frank vatrano for months. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, tas said:

I agree I prefer hoglander driving a bottom 6 line. but I also want my bottom 6 guys killing penalties. 

I think it's possible now that Mikheyev has been traded. the PK could use his battle and speed.  Tocch though likes PKrs with reach like Joshua and Myers.  If DeBrusk's time is going to be on the PP his PK time will be limited. Hogs will get an opportunity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pure961089 said:

I think it's possible now that Mikheyev has been traded. the PK could use his battle and speed.  Tocch though likes PKrs with reach like Joshua and Myers.  If DeBrusk's time is going to be on the PP his PK time will be limited. Hogs will get an opportunity.

I'm less worried about him getting the opportunity and more worried about him having the defensive sense to help keep the puck out of the back of the net. 

 

I'd love to see him succeed at it though, because if you have a bottom 6 energy player who kills penalties and puts up 20+ goals, that's a great thing to have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Hogs and Podz said:

where on bottom 6?  take Sherwoods spot?  Suter? Heinen?  No, the team has progressed to the point that unless they break up the '3rd line' and have Hogs take over DT's spot or Garly, there's no room for Hogs.... unless of course, he can stick to JT's or Petey's line. 

why cant the bottom 6 look like this?

Garland - Heinen - Joshua

Hoglander - Suter - Sherwood

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tas said:

I'm less worried about him getting the opportunity and more worried about him having the defensive sense to help keep the puck out of the back of the net. 

 

I'd love to see him succeed at it though, because if you have a bottom 6 energy player who kills penalties and puts up 20+ goals, that's a great thing to have. 

so he's probably not going to be a special teams player.  that's ok, he's such a good even strength 4th liner.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pure961089 said:

why cant the bottom 6 look like this?

Garland - Heinen - Joshua

Hoglander - Suter - Sherwood

because teddy blueger and probably daniel sprong. 

Edited by tas
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pure961089 said:

so he's probably not going to be a special teams player.  that's ok, he's such a good even strength 4th liner.  

the problem is that it's hard to have room for guys like that. if you don't play on special teams, you need to be absolutely exceptional or it's unlikely you're going to last long, because sooner than later someone else is going to come along who can do what you can at even strength but also contribute on special teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...