Dr. Crossbar Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 Just now, Hammertime said: 0-82 pace. Wet blanket wet dream. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cranston Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 (edited) 5 minutes ago, RU SERIOUS said: Get a bag of pucks? RU Serious? We'd have to give whoever takes him 7 million per year. I would risk 4.6 mil per year on him. Edited October 10 by Cranston 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JeremyCuddles Posted October 10 Popular Post Share Posted October 10 3 minutes ago, Dr. Crossbar said: You're going to be proven wrong. Petey has been tripping over his skates every year he's been in the league. I been waiting to eat crow on my Petey takes for 4 years now. First two years I gave him the benefit of the doubt as he was a kid. He's 26 in November. Hoglander is bigger and stronger than him for crying out loud. Lol. Dude is 5'9, come on. 2 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJC Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 (edited) 6 minutes ago, RU SERIOUS said: Isn't that what the Pre season was intended for - instead of playing 15 players per game that will never make the NHL. Makes no sense Quinn! No that’s not what it’s for. It’s to get wholesale looks on player development throughout the org, suss out progress, and to allow the NHL players to absorb and test out systems tweaks and vets to recondition physically prior to opener. It’s not necessarily to suss out lines etc. and shouldn’t be because true chemistry is proven against actual NHL competition and emerges over time out of familiarity and systems play. Lots of roster turnover, yet ppl expect near perfection off the hop. Highly unrealistic. Give them 5-10 games to diagnose exact issues Edited October 10 by RWJC 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimito Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 (edited) Edited October 10 by Jaimito 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post luckylager Posted October 10 Popular Post Share Posted October 10 Canucks played hockey for 17 minutes tonight. It wasn't enough 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 8 minutes ago, 24K said: Nah, 3 of them is definitely on Silvos. Those long shots are his Achilles heel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnstorm Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 2 minutes ago, Dr. Crossbar said: 0-1 ... season's over. Pfffftt! Lol 0-0-1 . Far worse than you suggest. I say trade everyone and start from scratch. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hammertime Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 5 minutes ago, Dr. Crossbar said: You're going to be proven wrong. I hope not, That would suck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU SERIOUS Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 13 minutes ago, Cromeslab said: Classic dominate the 1st then shit the bed just like "The Good 'ol J.B. Decade of Despair" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 1 minute ago, Barnstorm said: 0-0-1 . Far worse than you suggest. I say trade everyone and start from scratch. No just Silov's and 40 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cranston Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 4 minutes ago, Smashian Kassian said: I didnt mind DeBrusk. Made a nice play on one of the goals, goes to hard areas. Fair enough. I didn't notice him but my attention isn't very focused nowadays. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimito Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Hammertime said: 0-82 pace. 41-0-41 Edited October 10 by Jaimito Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swimmer Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 Seemed to stop competing in the 2nd and 3rd. Not acceptable in this league if you want to win games. Hope the coach gets this sorted. At least managed the single point. Next. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 2 minutes ago, luckylager said: Canucks played hockey for 17 minutes tonight. It wasn't enough Although, it kind of was almost enough. Lol. Which goes to show how ass Calgary is, but yeah. Our effort was cheeks for way too much of this game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckylager Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 1 minute ago, Hairy Kneel said: Those long shots are his Achilles heel. In close, he lost his crease on one, and forgot to paddle down coming across on another. Wasn't a good night for Silovs, but a lot of guys stunk tonight. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Crossbar Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 1 minute ago, JeremyCuddles said: Petey has been tripping over his skates every year he's been in the league. I been waiting to eat crow on my Petey takes for 4 years now. First two years I gave him the benefit of the doubt as he was a kid. He's 26 in November. Hoglander is bigger and stronger than him for crying out loud. Lol. Dude is 5'9, come on. Let me just say that I think he'll put it together like the Sedins did ... but ... and ... that he needs to put it together given his contract. Big believer in Hoglander and he's only 23. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Crossbar Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 4 minutes ago, Barnstorm said: 0-0-1 . Far worse than you suggest. I say trade everyone and start from scratch. Lol ... worse than Benning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 (edited) Honestly its a very embarrassing loss but im not overly worried. Its a big time wakeup call, but they showed in the 1st what they are capable of & thankfully they got a point. Some good, some bad, but most of all were back into regular season mode after a collapse like this so... onto friday. Edited October 10 by Smashian Kassian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrwipeout Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 24 minutes ago, Qwags said: Silovs needs to be better. Especially with long point shots. his right side topside seems a bit weak. i dont blame silovs for the loss though, u cant loose when ur up 4-1. if we cant defend wer in trouble. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Harvey Specter Posted October 10 Popular Post Share Posted October 10 7 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 2 minutes ago, luckylager said: In close, he lost his crease on one, and forgot to paddle down coming across on another. Wasn't a good night for Silovs, but a lot of guys stunk tonight. Well here we go for excuses for weak players Well his long shot reads killed us in the playoffs So w.e. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU SERIOUS Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 (edited) 12 minutes ago, RWJC said: No that’s not what it’s for. It’s to get wholesale looks on player development throughout the org, suss out progress, and to allow the NHL players to absorb and test out systems tweaks and vets to recondition physically prior to opener. It’s not necessarily to suss out lines etc. and shouldn’t be because true chemistry is proven against actual NHL competition and emerges over time out of familiarity and systems play. Lots of roster turnover, yet ppl expect near perfection off the hop. Highly unrealistic. Give them 5-10 games to diagnose exact issues I'll agree with the 2nd statement you made and agree with the last. Cheers! Edited October 10 by RU SERIOUS 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qwags Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 These are the types of losses I hate the most. Not because of the loss, but HOW they lost. They beat themselves. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1-d Posted October 10 Share Posted October 10 3 minutes ago, Dr. Crossbar said: You're going to be proven wrong. More often than not, holding onto an asset pays better dividends than giving it up early. We already saw what they're capable of at their very best. We just need to be a little more patient for the return. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.