Jump to content

[Waivers] October 2, 2023


Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, CaptainCanuck12 said:

I'm sure the Canucks would love to add Peeke's size on D, but if Bernard-Docker can be had for free, that might be too good an opportunity for Allvin to pass up.  Might just be determined by seeing if he falls to us or not.  Anyone have any idea where we stand in the waiver claim pecking order as of now?  Is it the same as the draft order?

I think it’s just reverse draft order or just reverse previous points - and doesn’t matter how many claims you make the positions stay all year.

 

You’re right about the free asset, too. Interesting case here for Allvin.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RWJC said:

CGY C Ben Jones  is a surprising name/option according to Flames blogger Trevor Neufeld:

 

“Clarke Bishop, Ben Jones, Colton Poolman and Oskar Dansk will report to the AHL squad to start preparing for the regular season. The biggest surprise was Jones. The 6’0”, 190lb center plays a hard game. 

The 24 year old center made a strong case to slot in on the fourth line at camp this time around. The former Niagara Icedog put up a respectable 17 goals and 54 points in 71 games last season on the Flames’ affiliate.”

 

We already have decent C depth for Abby though so I can’t see us claiming him.

If we claimed him we would have to leave him on our NHL roster. Otherwise we waive him and every other team can take him... including Calgary would could then send him down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Coryberg said:

If we claimed him we would have to leave him on our NHL roster. Otherwise we waive him and every other team can take him... including Calgary would could then send him down.

Thanks, I realize that. What I meant is it would prohibit some Abby C depth from possibly being called up…Raty, Sasson, Dowling, Neilsen, Wouters have all been invested into and PA might want to see how some of them perform with the big club prior to making a C waiver claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, EliPeterson40 said:

 

We should be taking a hard look at JBD, if he makes it to us 

I mean I get the whole right handed shot former first round young defenseman but honestly he hasn't shown anything that would warrant making a claim for him. I mean where would he slot in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Ryan Strome said:

I mean I get the whole right handed shot former first round young defenseman but honestly he hasn't shown anything that would warrant making a claim for him. I mean where would he slot in?

Yeah, I’m always intrigued by 1st rounders hitting the waiver wire but Taj is such a mouth breathing idiot. 
 

“He’s better than what they have on the RHS” no he’s exactly what the Canucks have like 2-3 of after Hronek and Myers.  
 

Young 6-foot-190-pound players who have shown some promise but haven’t done enough to stick in the NHL.  We’re really quite flush with that, actually.

Edited by The Duke
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point, I don't think we need any more projects. Nor should we think about waiver cast offs for RD acquisitions. I mean, they're other team  cast offs so why would we wan 'em?!?!?!?!?!???? 

 

Yea, I know. We could get lucky. But then we'd possibly be in a Kravtsov scenario. Surely Kravtsov was promising for what we gave up for him, but a freebie from the waiver wire in preseason isn't too promising. Mostly............ 

  • Like 1
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JBD is one we should look at closely. A 2018 1st round draft pick that's a  right-handed defensive dman that skates well. I view him as an immediate upgrade + better potential than Noah Juulsen. I suspect we are keep two healthy scratches for Dmen with each type of handedness. 

 

Hughes McWard

Cole Hronek

Soucy Myers

Wolanin JBD

Brisbois Juulson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Grandmaster said:

Absolutely nothing to see here. That’s my point 

He is a Defensive dman his Hockey DB page wont jump out at you. He had a hell of a year in 2020-21:

 

2020-2021

NCAA (NCHC) Best Defensive Defenseman

NCAA (NCHC) Champion

NCAA (NCHC) Regular Season Champion

NCAA (NCHC) Second All-Star Team

World Championship Gold Medal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From an article this morning by Drance in the Athletic:

 

Waiver targets

 

The Canucks need another right-handed defender, but unfortunately (and obviously), NHL teams are loathe to waive players matching that description.

 

Between now and the roster deadline, there could still be a few intriguing names that surface on the wire and it’ll be interesting to see if the Canucks put in a claim to bolster their depth. One thing to note here is that Vancouver’s poor performance last season is an edge in this particular marketplace. As a result of its finish last season, Vancouver owns the 11th-highest waiver priority through Nov. 1.

 

One of those intriguing names that could hit the wire is Ottawa Senators defender Jacob Bernard-Docker, who will be waived by the Senators on Tuesday, the club announced. Still just 23 years old, Bernard-Docker is certainly interesting because of his age and skating ability, but there should be real questions about his ability to hold up in more than a third-pair role.

 

The fit seems particularly problematic if he’s asked to play with Hughes. We know Hughes can carry a pair, of course, but there’s still a baseline level of puck skill required to effectively complement him.

 

Chris Tanev, Jordie Benn and Luke Schenn might not be dynamic puck carriers, but they share the common trait of being passable — or even deceptively good — at passing the puck. That’s what permitted them to effectively recycle pucks over to Hughes without wasting possessions.

 

Tucker Poolman is an example of a player who didn’t hit that baseline level of puck skill. It’s why he never really fit on Hughes’ right side despite being a great skater and having solid defensive instincts. I’d suggest Bernard-Docker profiles closer to a Poolman type, without the size, than a Schenn type.

 

Looking over the numbers game that various teams are dealing with around the league, there aren’t many who fit the bill in terms of right-side defenders who could be waived. Here are some names that stand out at a glance.

 

1. Dylan Coghlan from Duncan, B.C. seems like he’ll be in tough to break camp with the Carolina Hurricanes.


2. Daniil Miromanov, 26, of the Vegas Golden Knights is interesting as a late-blooming 6-foot-4 righty with a decent scoring profile. Yes, he is a Dan Milstein client.


3. Grant Hutton is big, right-handed, can defend and will likely get lost in the shuffle on Long Island.

 

All of these players are better suited as third-pair defenders or outright depth guys. Even if Hughes’ partner is used situationally and averages third-pair minutes in games, trying to fill a premium spot in the lineup at this juncture is extremely difficult to do effectively on the waiver wire.

 

https://theathletic.com/4924637/2023/10/03/vancouver-canucks-preseason-elias-pettersson/?amp=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, CaptainCanuck12 said:

I'm sure the Canucks would love to add Peeke's size on D, but if Bernard-Docker can be had for free, that might be too good an opportunity for Allvin to pass up.  Might just be determined by seeing if he falls to us or not.  Anyone have any idea where we stand in the waiver claim pecking order as of now?  Is it the same as the draft order?

Season standings from last year until November.

 

I don't know enough about B-D to say if his other attributes overcome his not that impressive 2 assists in 32 NHL games. He's not small at least and is supposed to be good defensively, but is that side of his game developed enough to overcome the lack of offence?

Edited by elvis15
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, elvis15 said:

Season standings from last year until November.

 

I don't know enough about B-D to say if his other attributes overcome his not that impressive 2 assists in 32 NHL games. He's not small at least and is supposed to be good defensively, but is that side of his game developed enough to overcome the lack of offence?

The most important attribute of a blueliner is the ability to play defence.  Any offensive production is a bonus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...