Jump to content

Hamas attacking Israel


Sabrefan1

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, RWMc1 said:

 

I've noticed in most of these sorts of videos lately that they are not wearing uniforms but are dressed as civilians. If the IDF bombs them the un will claim that they are civilians and many will buy into the narrative.

 

It's not just recent, it's always been like that.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/08/13/middleeast/israel-strike-gaza-twins-intl-latam
 

So this is what.. more fake news created by Hamas?

 

I agree that Hamas needs to be taken out. What I’m arguing is that Israel is NOT doing a good enough job of sparing innocent lives. Not fucking close.

 

To those arguing that death tolls are being exaggerated, etc - you are missing the point. Israel needs to do a better job of NOT killing non-combatants.

 

History will not look kindly on what is happening here, I guarantee you that.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Babych said:

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/08/13/middleeast/israel-strike-gaza-twins-intl-latam
 

So this is what.. more fake news created by Hamas?

 

I agree that Hamas needs to be taken out. What I’m arguing is that Israel is NOT doing a good enough job of sparing innocent lives. Not fucking close.

 

To those arguing that death tolls are being exaggerated, etc - you are missing the point. Israel needs to do a better job of NOT killing non-combatants.

 

History will not look kindly on what is happening here, I guarantee you that.

 

Some in this thread will show you stats that every war has civilian casualties.

 

They call it the cost of war.

 

Kinda like the kids in the states that get shot at schools etc....some call it the cost of freedom. 

 

I backed out of this thread, mostly, a while back. I was called idealistic.  My criticism is that the on going conflict over there is doing the same thing over, and over, and over. There has to be a better way? but no.... this is how wars are apparently, they cant be any different, and if children die or strave then its Hama's fault. No other discussion respected.

Edited by bishopshodan
  • Like 1
  • Huggy Bear 1
  • Vintage 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, bishopshodan said:

 

Some in this thread will show you stats that every war has civilian casualties.

 

They call it the cost of war.

 

Kinda like the kids in the states that get shot at schools etc....some call it the cost of freedom. 

 

I backed out of this thread, mostly, a while back. I was called idealistic.  My criticism is that the on going conflict over there is doing the same thing over, and over, and over. There has to be a better way? but no.... this is how wars are apparently, they cant be any different, and if children die or strave then its Hama's fault. No other discussion respected.


I think you and I are like-minded, brother.

 

Thank you for this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Babych said:

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/08/13/middleeast/israel-strike-gaza-twins-intl-latam
 

So this is what.. more fake news created by Hamas?

 

I agree that Hamas needs to be taken out. What I’m arguing is that Israel is NOT doing a good enough job of sparing innocent lives. Not fucking close.

 

To those arguing that death tolls are being exaggerated, etc - you are missing the point. Israel needs to do a better job of NOT killing non-combatants.

 

History will not look kindly on what is happening here, I guarantee you that.

 

Have you ever been to war? Not in a movie but actually fighting? Just curious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bishopshodan said:

 

Some in this thread will show you stats that every war has civilian casualties.

 

They call it the cost of war.

 

Kinda like the kids in the states that get shot at schools etc....some call it the cost of freedom. 

 

I backed out of this thread, mostly, a while back. I was called idealistic.  My criticism is that the on going conflict over there is doing the same thing over, and over, and over. There has to be a better way? but no.... this is how wars are apparently, they cant be any different, and if children die or strave then its Hama's fault. No other discussion respected.

 

There is a better way. But it probably won't be seen in our lifetimes. I'm quite confident that if every ME country was a democracy, that would be the end of this kind of warfare we are seeing right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, RomanPer said:

 

Have you ever been to war? Not in a movie but actually fighting? Just curious.

How does that align with Russia's actions in Ukraine. Same? Different? Sometimes it seems like you do a lot of mental gymnastics to justify two different positions in two different countries (both conveniently personally connected to you).

  • Cheers 1
  • ThereItIs 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bishopshodan said:

 

Some in this thread will show you stats that every war has civilian casualties.

 

They call it the cost of war.

 

Kinda like the kids in the states that get shot at schools etc....some call it the cost of freedom. 

 

I backed out of this thread, mostly, a while back. I was called idealistic.  My criticism is that the on going conflict over there is doing the same thing over, and over, and over. There has to be a better way? but no.... this is how wars are apparently, they cant be any different, and if children die or strave then its Hama's fault. No other discussion respected.

Unfortunately when it has come to radicals and terrorism the only effective way in the past has been brute force. They are usually very committed to their cause and will dedicate their life to it. That said is a bad situation, with a heavily populated small area and Hamas using the civilians as human shields. I do think they Israel could be doing a better job to minimalize casualties for sure though and likely have aspiration to increase their power in the region. Hamas made a grave error on Oct 7 and are now suffering the consequences.      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LegioN said:

How does that align with Russia's actions in Ukraine. Same? Different? Sometimes it seems like you do a lot of mental gymnastics to justify two different positions in two different countries (both conveniently personally connected to you).


Who attacked who in both situations? I’m not a gymnast, I am a volleyball player, hitting it straight.

  • Vintage 1
  • ThereItIs 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, RomanPer said:


Who attacked who in both situations? I’m not a gymnast, I am a volleyball player, hitting it straight.

Fair enough, I'm replying more to your generalized "have you ever been in a war?" statement. Where killing babies in one part of the world is a war crime but killing babies in another part of the world is the cost of doing business.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RomanPer said:

 

Have you ever been to war? Not in a movie but actually fighting? Just curious.

Is that a prerequisite to having an opinion?   I don't often disagree with you (though I think you have certain biases that are as easy to spot as mine are) but I just don't think you are making a valid point. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Satchmo said:

Is that a prerequisite to having an opinion?   I don't often disagree with you (though I think you have certain biases that are as easy to spot as mine are) but I just don't think you are making a valid point. 

 

 

I've never been to war.

 

I have known some children though.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, LegioN said:

Fair enough, I'm replying more to your generalized "have you ever been in a war?" statement. Where killing babies in one part of the world is a war crime but killing babies in another part of the world is the cost of doing business.

There is a difference between collateral damage and intentional targeting. Russia is aiming at civilian targets, Israel is being forced to hit them because the enemy is hiding in them and using them to prosecute their war. I could make a long ass post trying to explain the difference but this isnt something thats hard to see so im just going to assume you are choosing to not see the difference to make your point.

 

Ive been seeing a lot of people saying that Israel should be able to do a better job of avoiding civilian casualties but no one seems to be willing to say how that is to be done?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Yoshiyoshi said:

Ive been seeing a lot of people saying that Israel should be able to do a better job of avoiding civilian casualties but no one seems to be willing to say how that is to be done?

It won't be easy to do but if attempts were made the world would notice and probably lighten up a bit.   I'd like to see more Entebbe level logistics and wizardry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LegioN said:

Fair enough, I'm replying more to your generalized "have you ever been in a war?" statement. Where killing babies in one part of the world is a war crime but killing babies in another part of the world is the cost of doing business.

 

Never said anything about killing babies. There's a lot more to war than "killing babies". My comment about being to war meant that it's easy to sit in a warm house, near a computer and be a pacifist and criticize things that happen in a war zone. Once you are in an active war - your perspective changes a bit. And I challenge you to show me examples where Israel DELIBERATELY targeted babies.

  • Cheers 1
  • MillerTime 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Satchmo said:

Is that a prerequisite to having an opinion?   I don't often disagree with you (though I think you have certain biases that are as easy to spot as mine are) but I just don't think you are making a valid point. 

 

 

Absolutely not, it wasn't meant as "if you've never been to war, you can't have an opinion". It was more in line with it's very easy to be an idealist and think that all is needed to stop the war is to stop shooting if you've never experienced it first hand. I don't wish on anyone to have that experience though.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Yoshiyoshi said:

There is a difference between collateral damage and intentional targeting. Russia is aiming at civilian targets, Israel is being forced to hit them because the enemy is hiding in them and using them to prosecute their war. I could make a long ass post trying to explain the difference but this isnt something thats hard to see so im just going to assume you are choosing to not see the difference to make your point.

 

Ive been seeing a lot of people saying that Israel should be able to do a better job of avoiding civilian casualties but no one seems to be willing to say how that is to be done?

 

This is precisely my point, thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Satchmo said:

It won't be easy to do but if attempts were made the world would notice and probably lighten up a bit.   I'd like to see more Entebbe level logistics and wizardry.

 

The world only notices what it wants to notice. The amount of efforts that Israel goes to, often putting themselves in tactical disadvantage is huge. But it's not sexy for the news around the world. They won't tell that Israel announces way in advance in Arabic about upcoming operation in certain areas, they won't show you leaflets that Israel distributes in advance of the attacks. They won't tell you about the "knock on the roof" that Israel does by dropping a light weight on the house they want to target long in advance. Not really sure what more Israel can do. And guess what - when something goes wrong, Israel admits it more often than not and investigates. And if investigation finds Israeli military personnel criminally responsible - they do go to jail.

  • Vintage 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, RomanPer said:

 

The world only notices what it wants to notice. The amount of efforts that Israel goes to, often putting themselves in tactical disadvantage is huge. But it's not sexy for the news around the world. They won't tell that Israel announces way in advance in Arabic about upcoming operation in certain areas, they won't show you leaflets that Israel distributes in advance of the attacks. They won't tell you about the "knock on the roof" that Israel does by dropping a light weight on the house they want to target long in advance. Not really sure what more Israel can do. And guess what - when something goes wrong, Israel admits it more often than not and investigates. And if investigation finds Israeli military personnel criminally responsible - they do go to jail.

Interesting.  Why is the world not told of this?

 

EDIT:

 

Senior Israeli source: Gaza will not be Hamastan; ‘roof knocking’ policy no longer norm

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/senior-israeli-source-gaza-will-not-be-hamastan-roof-knocking-policy-no-longer-norm/

 

(The comments section - which are edited for civility - in this article are quite something.  Granted they were all made Oct 9th/23. I was pretty pissed that day too.

)

Edited by Satchmo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Satchmo said:

Interesting.  Why is the world not told of this?

 

EDIT:

 

Senior Israeli source: Gaza will not be Hamastan; ‘roof knocking’ policy no longer norm

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/senior-israeli-source-gaza-will-not-be-hamastan-roof-knocking-policy-no-longer-norm/

 

(The comments section - which are edited for civility - in this article are quite something.  Granted they were all made Oct 9th/23. I was pretty pissed that day too.

)

 

It was October 9th and I wouldn't be surprised if "senior Israeli source" was someone like Ben Gvir... As for why the world is not told this - the world is told, the world chooses not to listen. Every attempt by Israel to present its side of the story is immediately being labeled "hasbarah" by the anti Israel crowd and became for some reason a swear word (the word "hasbarah" is translated as "explanation" from Hebrew). At some point Israel decided not to bother too hard since no matter what Israel says, the loud minority swarms every attempt. Some channels are still maintained though, like this one: https://x.com/IDF

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, bishopshodan said:

 

Some in this thread will show you stats that every war has civilian casualties.

 

They call it the cost of war.

 

Kinda like the kids in the states that get shot at schools etc....some call it the cost of freedom. 

 

I backed out of this thread, mostly, a while back. I was called idealistic.  My criticism is that the on going conflict over there is doing the same thing over, and over, and over. There has to be a better way? but no.... this is how wars are apparently, they cant be any different, and if children die or strave then its Hama's fault. No other discussion respected.

 

Yeah.

 

I have been called idealistic, a pacifist.

These are meant as insults. 

 

I have had one poster backhandedly state he will ram my face into piss.

Same poster told me to fuck off. 

 

The reason why Israel has backed down somewhat is because there has been international pressure on them to do so. 

 

We must always speak out against injustice, especially when you might be unpopular for doing so.

  • Huggy Bear 1
  • Vintage 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...