Bob Long Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 I like how our response to the cheap shots was, nah, we'll just embarrass you some more. 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoop Hogg Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 4 minutes ago, Chickenspear said: I can't really fault him for letting one slip, after a pounding like that, though... It’s running down the drain Going wherever it leaks Why he twerks is a mystery 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzle Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 4 minutes ago, Bob Long said: I like how our response to the cheap shots was, nah, we'll just embarrass you some more. Careful… winning doesn’t matter as much as being ‘tuff’ and ‘sticking up for yourself’ 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 1 minute ago, Dizzle said: Careful… winning doesn’t matter as much as being ‘tuff’ and ‘sticking up for yourself’ well lets not go too far. It was McDiver and DraiBaby after all, I mean how much could it have hurt? I did like Joshua answering the bell. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 2 minutes ago, Bob Long said: well lets not go too far. It was McDiver and DraiBaby after all, I mean how much could it have hurt? I did like Joshua answering the bell. Cryasitl is the best nickname I saw last night after he looked ready to bawl like a baby in the penalty box. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 So after last night I wonder if the Oil want Garland. If not how many teams are calling? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rypien-Punch Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 I think Garland brings a lot to the table. His skill, speed, forechecking, and grit are much needed on that top line. He's a better choice than Bouviller, and I think Micheyev might be better on the third. Bouviller is the guy to go in my opinion Garland Pettersson Kuzmenko PDG Miller Boeser Micheyev Suter Lafferty Joshua Blueger Hoglander 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 1 minute ago, Rypien-Punch said: I think Garland brings a lot to the table. His skill, speed, forechecking, and grit are much needed on that top line. He's a better choice than Bouviller, and I think Micheyev might be better on the third. Bouviller is the guy to go in my opinion Garland Pettersson Kuzmenko PDG Miller Boeser Micheyev Suter Lafferty Joshua Blueger Hoglander Also a lot easier to move as an expiring contract. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistolPete13 Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 Nothing like an asswhupping of the presumptive SC favourites (lol), to clear the air on this roller coaster of a thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Combover Posted October 13, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted October 13, 2023 If there’s no trade for garland in which we don’t have to pay or retain to move him then move Beauvillier. his expiring contract should be more desirable and we should get something in return. 1 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
27 Percent Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 1 minute ago, Combover said: If there’s no trade for garland in which we don’t have to pay or retain to move him then move Beauvillier. his expiring contract should be more desirable and we should get something in return. This was definitely the thought when we acquired him as a PC in the Bo trade. I just don't see it playing out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCupSyndrome Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 (edited) Garland interest Retaining on a three year contract doesn't sound like a good idea, especially given Garland's positive 5v5 point production. I have no idea about Fabbro and whether he is a solid reclamation target to play with Hughes, etc. https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/predators-jets-trade-interest-canucks-garland Edited October 14, 2023 by NoCupSyndrome 1 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackbeard Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 8 minutes ago, NoCupSyndrome said: Garland interest Retaining on a three year contract, especially given Garland's 5v5 point production. No idea about Fabbro and whether he is a solid reclamation target to play with Hughes, etc. https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/predators-jets-trade-interest-canucks-garland Is Fabbro better than Ethan Bear? If not, the Canucks might be better off waiting for Bear to get healthy and sign him. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 Me I think Garland's contract we don't need retain as smer time ufa's with the same points got mire money then Garland. Garland and Beau I would be listening to calls until we get a deal that works. Say we want a RHD then add Woo. Rathbone might be thrown in as he seems unhappy. Either way we should be able to get a decent return. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
testycal Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 As an older fan, Garland reminds me of Cliff Ronning. I like Garland's play and the Canuck staff needs to ensure he is utilized properly. He has snarl and a bite which few Canucks show....Bouvilier should be traded in priority to Garland and WORST case scenario...if Garland must go, near the end of the year when his value is high. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck You Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 We say we'd like for Garland to stay but does he want to? I wouldn't be surprised if both Garland and Beau are traded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 I don't think the issue is Garland wants to go. I think the team and player understands we need some cap room. The player would like to have some say where he'd like to go to if possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guntrix Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 Best case scenario would be for Garland to start the season out hot so the Canucks can actually get some value in return (or at the very least, trade him without retaining cap). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BC_Hawk Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 27 minutes ago, Canuck You said: We say we'd like for Garland to stay but does he want to? I wouldn't be surprised if both Garland and Beau are traded. He wants to stay and play in the top 6, not be matched with plugs on the 3/4th constantly. He is able to drive offence there. the guy works his tail off every night 22 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said: I don't think the issue is Garland wants to go. I think the team and player understands we need some cap room. The player would like to have some say where he'd like to go to if possible. I think the player wants to feel some security and be deployed properly. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 29 minutes ago, Canuck You said: We say we'd like for Garland to stay but does he want to? I wouldn't be surprised if both Garland and Beau are traded. Trading them both would be a great way to shave cap, it'd be great if players like Podz and Hoglander could take steps forward this season and fill those slots. This isn't to say Garland or Beau couldn't provide a level of value, we're just going to need to slot cheaper forwards into our lineup going forward as guys like Pettersson and Hronek get paid. I'm hoping Beau is traded or allowed to walk for exactly this reason. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted October 13, 2023 Share Posted October 13, 2023 1 hour ago, Blackbeard said: Is Fabbro better than Ethan Bear? If not, the Canucks might be better off waiting for Bear to get healthy and sign him. Yeah Fabbro is ok, but not really what we need. And yes Bear is a comparable guy that would likely cost less. FAR rather see either Trenin or Sissons as part of the return, even if we need to add and/or retain a mil. 30 minutes ago, BC_Hawk said: He wants to stay and play in the top 6, not be matched with plugs on the 3/4th constantly. He is able to drive offence there. the guy works his tail off every night I think the player wants to feel some security and be deployed properly. Problem being, he doesn't fill a need in our top 6, good player or not. If anything, we need another Mik to bump PDG down where he belongs. Garland is a good player that's a bad fit (for us). 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
testycal Posted October 14, 2023 Share Posted October 14, 2023 So why can't Garland anchor a third line that is in essence a 2B line which makes the team that much more difficult to play against? Garland is a good asset as his motor is always on which makes for effective back checking and positional play. I would not like to see him go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJC Posted October 14, 2023 Share Posted October 14, 2023 (edited) 13 minutes ago, testycal said: So why can't Garland anchor a third line that is in essence a 2B line which makes the team that much more difficult to play against? Garland is a good asset as his motor is always on which makes for effective back checking and positional play. I would not like to see him go. Because in that role, and with who’s ahead of him in the top 6, he will still receive 3rd line mins and believes he’s capable of more if given more ice time. Basically he realizes his ceiling here and that he’s likely only ever going to get a limited role (barring injury) Edited October 14, 2023 by RWJC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted October 14, 2023 Share Posted October 14, 2023 27 minutes ago, testycal said: So why can't Garland anchor a third line that is in essence a 2B line which makes the team that much more difficult to play against? Garland is a good asset as his motor is always on which makes for effective back checking and positional play. I would not like to see him go. 14 minutes ago, RWJC said: Because in that role, and with who’s ahead of him in the top 6, he will still receive 3rd line mins and believes he’s capable of more if given more ice time. Basically he realizes his ceiling here and that he’s likely only ever going to get a limited role (barring injury) This. Also still not a great fit given Suter isn't exactly huge and that's also likely the best line for Hoglander. All three are tenacious for their size...but Garland's going to always do better matched up with a bigger C and a bigger opposite wing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted October 14, 2023 Share Posted October 14, 2023 18 hours ago, Rypien-Punch said: I think Garland brings a lot to the table. His skill, speed, forechecking, and grit are much needed on that top line. He's a better choice than Bouviller, and I think Micheyev might be better on the third. Bouviller is the guy to go in my opinion Garland Pettersson Kuzmenko PDG Miller Boeser Micheyev Suter Lafferty Joshua Blueger Hoglander I agree completely, only hang up for me is if Garland does want out then see ya! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.