Hogs and Podz Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 16 minutes ago, Billabong said: Not surprising but Canucks have circled garland conversations with CBJ and NSH around peeke and fabbro Carolina is very intriguing! Probably wishful thinking though. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hogs and Podz Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 4 hours ago, wai_lai416 said: podz at this point is expandable I don't think you and I'll be friends... Plus... 'expandable'... I think you're expandable... Full of hot air that is. 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Combover Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 Can’t see us getting anything for garland at this point. PA couldn’t find a trade for him his agent can’t seem to find a team that’s interested. Hed clear waivers at this point. More and more looks like 30% retained and probably a prospect or pick and that’s just to move him so. we’d have to add more to get D that’s actually an upgrade . he’s a serviceable player I sure hope they don’t pay (to much) just to get rid of him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Lock Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 2 minutes ago, Combover said: Can’t see us getting anything for garland at this point. PA couldn’t find a trade for him his agent can’t seem to find a team that’s interested. Hed clear waivers at this point. More and more looks like 30% retained and probably a prospect or pick and that’s just to move him so. we’d have to add more to get D that’s actually an upgrade . he’s a serviceable player I sure hope they don’t pay (to much) just to get rid of him. Yeah, just trade the entire team while we're at it. They're all worthless in your books. lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks curse Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 (edited) To CBJ Hoglander Garland Jett Woo or Juulsen To VAN Peeke Cuelemens 2024 5th round pick Milky Petey Kuzy PDG Miller Boeser Joshua Suter Beauvellier Aman Bluegger Lafferty Hughes Hronek Cole Peeke Soucy Myers ---- Bear Edited October 16, 2023 by canucks curse Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamonds Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 If Chicago is poking around, I'd be pretty happy to do Garland for Murphy one-for-one with no salary retained either way. We gain $500,000 in cap room and add a big RHD. Chicago gets an improvement on Corey Perry/Taylor Raddysh/Tyler Johnson to run shotgun with Bedard and Hall. 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks curse Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 1 minute ago, Diamonds said: If Chicago is poking around, I'd be pretty happy to do Garland for Murphy one-for-one with no salary retained either way. We gain $500,000 in cap room and add a big RHD. Chicago gets an improvement on Corey Perry/Taylor Raddysh/Tyler Johnson to run shotgun with Bedard and Hall. I would be interested in this 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bob Long Posted October 16, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted October 16, 2023 retaining money on Garly is a bad idea. We'll be shedding new Beau, Myers, and the cap goes up. Just work with that. 1 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flickyoursedin Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 Need Columbus and Nashville to have some scoring troubles and Garland to have a hot start and hopefully force another gm into making a trade. Would love Garland for Fabbro, Peeke or Boqvist trade to go down. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huggy Bear Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 15 minutes ago, flickyoursedin said: Need Columbus and Nashville to have some scoring troubles and Garland to have a hot start and hopefully force another gm into making a trade. Would love Garland for Fabbro, Peeke or Boqvist trade to go down. Interesting to see Chicago and Carolina enter the mix. Two teams we've transacted with recently... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Combover Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 1 hour ago, The Lock said: Yeah, just trade the entire team while we're at it. They're all worthless in your books. lol Wtf are you talking about lol. Untie your panties. they’ve been trying to trade garland for what a 6 months a year …. Now the agent suppose to make the trade and you think hes got trade value lolololol. he’s a ok player but we have no bargaining power other gms know this we need cap space team that have cap will take him at a cost pretty basic and widely known information. I’d rather keep him than pay to get rid of him since as I said above (before your tantrum) he’s a serviceable player. but kick your feet have a little fit and tell yourself he’s a high value top six player that has a ton of value yet nobody wants him. makes sense. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Combover Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 28 minutes ago, Bob Long said: retaining money on Garly is a bad idea. We'll be shedding new Beau, Myers, and the cap goes up. Just work with that. Yup but only way garland goes is with retention and probably sweetener. doesn't reflect the player as much as the cap situation we once again find our selves. moving AB would probably yield a better return and have no cost. and are we really resigning him anyways. Myers at the deadline should have decent value as a rental. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RakuRaku Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 We should aim for a bigger deal by offloading BOTH Garland and Beauvillier.... we seriously don't need them around if we can get Podz back with some boosted confidence & consistency!! All we need now is a solid RHD plus a gritty guy tougher than Joshua in return!! The key is whether we'll give up picks/prospects or retain some salary %!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 5 minutes ago, Combover said: Yup but only way garland goes is with retention and probably sweetener. doesn't reflect the player as much as the cap situation we once again find our selves. moving AB would probably yield a better return and have no cost. and are we really resigning him anyways. Myers at the deadline should have decent value as a rental. I'd rather shed Beau than Garland, which is going to happen automatically. We can't retain any more money on guys, OEL is bad enough. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huggy Bear Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 37 minutes ago, canucks curse said: I would be interested in this Likewise...Chicago should also be able to take Garland's full contract without retention, and they have RD Zaitsev scratched at $4.5M for one more year to backfill Murphy. 34 minutes ago, Bob Long said: retaining money on Garly is a bad idea. We'll be shedding new Beau, Myers, and the cap goes up. Just work with that. Agreed...not loving the reports that the Canucks will have to retain to trade him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 Roslovic seems to be a guy bandied about. He makes 4M so it would be minimal savings this season but you'd get out of the remaining years. From an on-ice perspective it's a downgrade, Roslovic has been a pretty middling player but is a bit bigger & has some speed. I assume it would be like adding another Beauvillier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJC Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 Canucks Willing to Take a Player With Term in Garland Trade During his recent 32 Thoughts podcast, Elliotte Friedman noted that he got pushback from a few sources on his report that the Canucks were only willing to take a contract back in a Conor Garland trade if that contract was going to expire at the end of this season. He now reports that is not accurate. Apparently, if the Canucks like a player, they are willing to take that player with term if it makes sense and still allows them to win the deal financially and bank salary cap. https://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-rumors-october-16-2023/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwarrior Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 9 minutes ago, RWJC said: Canucks Willing to Take a Player With Term in Garland Trade During his recent 32 Thoughts podcast, Elliotte Friedman noted that he got pushback from a few sources on his report that the Canucks were only willing to take a contract back in a Conor Garland trade if that contract was going to expire at the end of this season. He now reports that is not accurate. Apparently, if the Canucks like a player, they are willing to take that player with term if it makes sense and still allows them to win the deal financially and bank salary cap. https://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-rumors-october-16-2023/ Just get it done already. I still have a bitter taste in my mouth from the OEL trade in the first place. I didn't like it when it happened, I don't like it now, and the fact we chased that trade down the damn rabbit hole for 2 off seasons just pisses me off. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJC Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 Transcript really makes these two sound like a couple of dimwits, but anyway: NHL Rumors: A Couple Teams Like Conor Garland but at a Reduced Salary 10/16/2023 Mark Easson Donnie & Dhali: Rick Dhaliwal and Don Taylor on the latest involving Conor Garland and the Vancouver Canucks. ** NHLRumors.com transcription Taylor: “You had some news regarding Conor Garland.” Dhaliwal: “Well, I just wanted to say this Donnie. I was told night that both sides continue to work the phones, the Canucks and Garland’s new agent Judd Muldaver. Muldaver, um. Taylor: “Is it Muldaver Muldaver?” Dhaliwal: “You’re looking at me, and waiting for me to screw up the name.” Taylor: “What’s his old agent?” Dhaliwal: “Peter Cooney. Good guy, Peter Cooney. Let me get going here.” Taylor: “So Muldaver isn’t a good guy?” Dhaliwal: “No, but Cooney’s a good guy. I’ve known him 20-30 years. Good guy. Muldaver knows this contract Donnie with term in a capped out NHL won’t be easy. The agent is going to need help from the Canucks. Retaining on Garland or adding a sweetener, that’s what, that’s what teams want. Teams think that Garland is a $3 million player, not a $5 million player. That’s why the Canucks haven’t been able to move him for the past year. If the Canucks can retain 30 percent Don, that’s $1.5 million, that makes the agents’ job a whole lot easier. That’s the word out there. That if the Canucks can get to $1.5 (million) on retention, it’s gonna help.” Taylor: “Okay, can I just say something here? ” Dhaliwal: “Go ahead.” Taylor: “Okay, those numbers are fabulous. Outstanding. For that we’ll get you a gift certificate to Sammy J Peppers, but there’s a couple teams interested in Conor Garland, right?” Dhaliwal: “Yeah. I’m getting to that. That was next. My goodness. There are teams interested. I was told last night Nashville and someone told me Winnipeg. There’s others as well. You know why there’s teams interested? Because they’ve been trying to move the guy for over a year Don. So anyways, that’s the good news. There is interest in the player. But sadly for the Canucks the interest is not there at $4.9 million. They got to get that number down.” https://nhlrumors.com/nhl-rumors-a-couple-teams-like-conor-garland-but-at-a-reduced-salary/2023/10/16/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huggy Bear Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 (edited) 14 minutes ago, RWJC said: Canucks Willing to Take a Player With Term in Garland Trade During his recent 32 Thoughts podcast, Elliotte Friedman noted that he got pushback from a few sources on his report that the Canucks were only willing to take a contract back in a Conor Garland trade if that contract was going to expire at the end of this season. He now reports that is not accurate. Apparently, if the Canucks like a player, they are willing to take that player with term if it makes sense and still allows them to win the deal financially and bank salary cap. https://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-rumors-october-16-2023/ They're not banking much salary cap until Poolman is off the books. That might point to a trade with Chicago who openly weaponized cap space for picks in taking on Zaitsev last season. Edited October 16, 2023 by Huggy Bear 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeanSeanBean Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 3 hours ago, Billabong said: Not surprising but Canucks have circled garland conversations with CBJ and NSH around peeke and fabbro Let's go Phil, get a job. Someone has gots to sign The Thrill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainQuin Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 Curious that Washington is interested ?? anyone know if they have anyone in their lineup that would make sense to trade garland for ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamonds Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 18 minutes ago, CaptainQuin said: Curious that Washington is interested ?? anyone know if they have anyone in their lineup that would make sense to trade garland for ?? Nick Jensen is who I'd want. Good get stopgap option at RD while we wait for Willander to be ready. I'd love Iorio, but not a realistic return for Garland. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted October 16, 2023 Share Posted October 16, 2023 Way it is Garland is paid fair if you look at summer deals. Garland and Woo or Juulsen For a RHD with term. This way after seasons end one of McWard or Johansson can step in.Hirose will take Coles place and we will have great D. Any other trade doesn't make sense unless we do two and second involved Beau. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huggy Bear Posted October 17, 2023 Share Posted October 17, 2023 (edited) Sounds like there’s enough interested to drive the price up…or keep retention down, hopefully Edited October 17, 2023 by Huggy Bear 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.