J-23 Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 I would like to run this on the powerplay. At least try it out. Hronek is good at getting shots on net. Miller - Pettersson - Boeser Hughes - Hronek Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huggy Bear Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 1 minute ago, coolboarder said: Yes, that was my initial thought but I also feel that it could also apply to any point in the game that led to a goal from any immediate missed penalty that led to change of possession that lead to a goal. If there is a change of possession that didn't lead to a goal, and a penalty was committed at this point and didn't affect the outcome and play resumed for 3 minutes without stoppage, then no coach challenge at all. It has to be directed tied to a blown call that led to a goal directly affecting the team defense or the defending team didn't have a chance to have a line change due to this. That was my intention of this rules of a coach challenge for anything. No pp be awarded in this case. The last goal is a good example of this rule that would have worked and still have 3 on 3 OT at the neutral zone faceoff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 3 minutes ago, stawns said: Where are there better refs? Not on their knees at NHL headquarters taking orders from Bettman and then flying out the window. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post J-23 Posted October 29, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted October 29, 2023 Hronek with 7 points in 8 games with no 1st unit powerplay time. Not bad. 4 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huggy Bear Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 1 minute ago, J-23 said: I would like to run this on the powerplay. At least try it out. Hronek is good at getting shots on net. Miller - Pettersson - Boeser Hughes - Hronek Agreed. Kuzmenko could improve the 2nd PK, but who would QB it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post xMagnus Posted October 29, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted October 29, 2023 53 minutes ago, Squirter said: Fucking bitch ass cock sucking waste of a life dick swallowing referees fucking beat the shit out of them leaving the ice. Name checks out 7 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 6 minutes ago, Huggy Bear said: They can’t get them all right, but the game needs to be called consistently. Don’t make us effing guess that you’ll put your whistles away in OT. Call it the same way, and be willing to overturn it if you get it wrong. Id like to see coaches challenges expanded a bit to make more calls reviewable. Deciding a game in OT with a call (or non-call) is more important than regulation goals due to offsides. They can’t. I’ve seen blown calls but when something happens right in front of you and you don’t call it when you were clearly watching it, it is absolutely and totally suspect. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayDangles Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 6 minutes ago, 24K said: So your answer is to have zero accountability from the refs? No wonder hockey is not growing. Who wants to watch a sport where results is heavily influenced by the bias of the refs. Yes, my answer is continue the game the way it's been played for over 100 years. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24K Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 Just now, JayDangles said: Yes, my answer is continue the game the way it's been played for over 100 years. Sorry to break it to you but the game today is not even close to that played 100 years ago. 1 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coho8888 Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 1 hour ago, mj vic said: Who was that guy pretending to be Myers tonight? It was a young Chara dressed as Myers. It’s alo most Halloween Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimito Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 got lot more D men scoring this season 8 games: QH 3 Soucy 2 Myers 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-23 Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 Just now, Huggy Bear said: Agreed. Kuzmenko could improve the 2nd PK, but who would QB it? Myers was good in previous years. Soucy has 2 goals this season as well. 1st Unit Pettersson - Miller - Boeser Hughes - Hronek 2nd Unit Mikheyev - Blueger/Suter - Hoglander Kuzmenko - Myers/Soucy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolboarder Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 2 minutes ago, PhillipBlunt said: They can’t. I’ve seen blown calls but when something happens right in front of you and you don’t call it when you were clearly watching it, it is absolutely and totally suspect. Or even if ref didn't see the infraction completely and somehow assumed that he committed a penalty like tripping, he didn't see the cause of a trip but he was close to him and still call it anyways, a phantom penalty. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhoodlum Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 47 minutes ago, 1-d said: That is so true, but I'd still want the players keep their balls intact. Sami Salo has entered the chat. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayDangles Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 Just now, 24K said: Sorry to break it to you but the game today is not even close to that played 100 years ago. What I'm saying is changing what's expected from the refs won't get you the result you want. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimito Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 1 minute ago, 24K said: Sorry to break it to you but the game today is not even close to that played 100 years ago. @Ghostsof1915 would know. ask him 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Canuck You Posted October 29, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted October 29, 2023 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24K Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 (edited) 5 minutes ago, JayDangles said: What I'm saying is changing what's expected from the refs won't get you the result you want. Hence reffing robots. Algos will screw both teams but at least you can't complain it ain't consistent or biased. Edited October 29, 2023 by 24K 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 2 minutes ago, 24K said: Sorry to break it to you but the game today is not even close to that played 100 years ago. but……..still. The refs shouldn’t have to possess any semblance of impartiality or be accountable at all when the entire crux of their position in life is to call infractions in a hockey game and ensure it’s played fairly. They’ve been this infallible and easily influenced for a hundred years, buddy!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 4 minutes ago, coolboarder said: Or even if ref didn't see the infraction completely and somehow assumed that he committed a penalty like tripping, he didn't see the cause of a trip but he was close to him and still call it anyways, a phantom penalty. If you watched the game, the ref was ten feet away watching the play. Not seeing the cause of the trip is an excuse. Pure and simple. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barn Burner Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 44 minutes ago, Sharpshooter said: I kinda think Hrudey and Scott are kinda scared of Coach. They would be! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolboarder Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 Just now, PhillipBlunt said: If you watched the game, the ref was ten feet away watching the play. Not seeing the cause of the trip is an excuse. Pure and simple. I'm not speaking of tonight's game, the ref looked away, then turned, saw the guy on the ice and assumed with a late call as an example in the past. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huggy Bear Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 (edited) 8 minutes ago, J-23 said: Myers was good in previous years. Soucy has 2 goals this season as well. 1st Unit Pettersson - Miller - Boeser Hughes - Hronek 2nd Unit Mikheyev - Blueger/Suter - Hoglander Kuzmenko - Myers/Soucy I’m here for it. Put the call in to Tocchet. 11 minutes ago, PhillipBlunt said: They can’t. I’ve seen blown calls but when something happens right in front of you and you don’t call it when you were clearly watching it, it is absolutely and totally suspect. I agree, that was brutal. Read the last part of my post…I want to see calls/non-calls that impact goals (especially GWG) to be eligible for video review. The average game has what, 4-5 goals. Maybe that leads to 1 more video review per game. No penalty for losing a challenge if it’s a GWG? Vote on that at the next GM meeting FFS Edited October 29, 2023 by Huggy Bear 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoop Hogg Posted October 29, 2023 Share Posted October 29, 2023 How about instead of awarding us the Stanley cup, they give us 5 minutes alone with the officials? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Jaimito Posted October 29, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted October 29, 2023 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.