Jump to content

[Weekes/Dhaliwal] Zadorov Requests Trade, Canucks/Leafs Among Interested Teams


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, R3aL said:

How do we fit Zad in? 
 

i mean RT has showed zero desire to play Cole on the right side. 
 

with 

 

Hughes

Cole

Soucy

 

i just don’t see it. 
 

RHD is so pressing. And I can’t think now that Bear is the answer.

 

unless their goal is to use this cap to upgrade a top 6 winger and then sign bear but I don’t know. Eating popcorn here and I trust what they’ve been doing


Soucy can and has played right side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Coconuts said:

Leafs could be particularly desperate to beef up their D, missing the playoffs and not being able to capitalize on the last year of Matthews's and Nylander's current deals would be a huge failure 

 

Lot of teams right behind them right now 

 

 

 


Trade them Myers???

 

🙂

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, IBatch said:

Soucy and Cole play both sides.   Yes we need a RHD.    Bear and Zadarov would work.   We'd have to ask CAL to retain.   And give up some futures.    Which we likely will be doing for the next two years.  

I understand they have played both sides before.

 

but has RT or Foote showed at any point this season it’s an option in their mind or what they want?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, DeNiro said:


Soucy can and has played right side.

I understand Cole and Soucy have played their off side before.
 

But RT and Foote has shown this is not how they want to deploy our defence so I’m not convinced.
 

I also think Zad and Soucy are similar level dmen 


but with that in mind and say they actually were comfortable putting Cole or Soucy on their right side

 

hughes-Hronek/cole/bear

zadorov-Cole/Hronek

soucy-bear/cole


is that what we are running? If we acquire bear and Zad and Myers is moved 

 

Or we could not give up assets to over pay for Zad and run:

 

Hughes-Hronek

Cole-Bear

Soucy-Myers

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, R3aL said:

I understand Cole and Soucy have played their off side before.
 

But RT and Foote has shown this is not how they want to deploy our defence so I’m not convinced.
 

I also think Zad and Soucy are similar level dmen 


but with that in mind and say they actually were comfortable putting Cole or Soucy on their right side

 

hughes-Hronek/cole/bear

zadorov-Cole/Hronek

soucy-bear/cole


is that what we are running? If we acquire bear and Zad and Myers is moved 

 

Or we could not give up assets to over pay for Zad and run:

 

Hughes-Hronek

Cole-Bear

Soucy-Myers

 

It's strange, we won't move our LHD to the right (despite Soucy/Cole previously doing so with success) but we are doing it right to left. Since Soucy has been injured we've used a RHD as 3LHD. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, AK-19 said:

It's strange, we won't move our LHD to the right (despite Soucy/Cole previously doing so with success) but we are doing it right to left. Since Soucy has been injured we've used a RHD as 3LHD. 

I’m curious if it’s top 4 pref 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would Canucks want Bear when they actually need a top 4 D?  

 

I really do hope they did not clear room just for bear....sigh....that would be old Canucks typical play.

 

I hope our mgmt is targeting an actual good D man or don't bother making a trade.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mac said:

Why would Canucks want Bear when they actually need a top 4 D?  

 

I really do hope they did not clear room just for bear....sigh....that would be old Canucks typical play.

 

I hope our mgmt is targeting an actual good D man or don't bother making a trade.

 

Alvin proved this year he has clear picture what he want.No overpaid,old long term players.

  • Like 1
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BobbyClarke said:

We should not add Zadorov unless we get rid of Myers. Z can hit but he’s crappy at defense. We can’t have 2 defenseman on our team who are both crappy at defense. These guys need to have very limited minutes. 

Z is actually pretty good a defense bruh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SaWho are we targeting on D ?

whoooo could it be ?

zadorov ?

tanev ?

samheim with retention ?

how about ekholm with major retention from EDM ?

Zub ?

 

 

saravelli on 650 with Kypreos saying Canucks hoping to add a d man with this cap space in next 1-2 weeks 

 

that would be too early  for Bear who is supposedly not ready til after Christmas 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...