qwijjibo Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 Just now, Barnstorm said: You’re right, I don’t have a clue what you’re saying. Something about not being able to celebrate and being unhappy. I'm saying having offside reviews for plays that are so marginally offside or for plays that happened WELL before the scoring play is ridiculous. Tell me you've never been passed off when a Canucks goal got disallowed because the play was JUST barely offside 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barn Burner Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 1 minute ago, PhillipBlunt said: How did the loathsome New York Ringers leapfrog us in the standings? One less game played. Winning percentage. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Shekky Posted November 13, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted November 13, 2023 1 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijjibo Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 Just now, PistolPete13 said: Can always count on you to provide measured takes. The borderline offside calls big me too. Yours Habs seem to be on an upward trend. Tonight’s game was hard fought and Habs were a tough out. They're definitely looking up They're fast and work hard. A couple more years of the young guys maturing and getting Dach into the lineup will do wonders. That said the Canucks were definitely the better team tonight 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 Unless the Canucks are parting with a 1st round pick, I don't think Garland, or Beau is going to going to get us a defenceman. And even then, the Canucks probably have to add, in which case then we're overpaying. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Alflives Posted November 13, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted November 13, 2023 12 minutes ago, qwijjibo said: Full credit to the Canucks on the win but I really hate the ticky tacky offside reviews. 95% of the reviews take goals off the board that 100% should count. It's taken the joy out of the game. You can't even celebrate a goal when it happens in case there's a review Full credit … but? We destroyed the Haberdoodle Bugs. Dominated. Pounded. 3 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barn Burner Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 Just now, qwijjibo said: I'm saying having offside reviews for plays that are so marginally offside or for plays that happened WELL before the scoring play is ridiculous. Tell me you've never been passed off when a Canucks goal got disallowed because the play was JUST barely offside It's okay to be pissed off and disappointed, but it's happened to the Canucks on too many occasions, as we all know, but it's still the rule. It works both ways. And, in this case, he was clearly a stride over the blue line offside. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 3 minutes ago, PistolPete13 said: Can always count on you to provide measured takes. The borderline offside calls bug me too. Yours Habs seem to be on an upward trend. Tonight’s game was hard fought and Habs were a tough out. Habs are not climbing very high. No elite talent. Missed on two high picks in a row. Could have had Cooley and Michkov. Big misses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 9 minutes ago, steviewonder20 said: Doesn’t matter who our goalie is, we have a piss poor record against the Leafs in Toronto. The problem is Vancouver reverted to old bad habits. They started out well, then derailed. Nice to have a bounce back game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 2 minutes ago, Barn Burner said: It's okay to be pissed off and disappointed, but it's happened to the Canucks on too many occasions, as we all know, but it's still the rule. It works both ways. And, in this case, he was clearly a stride over the blue line offside. And honestly it seems like 90% of the challenges for offside don't work. What is lame is when you know it's onside and you challenge it anyways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 Just now, Ghostsof1915 said: Unless the Canucks are parting with a 1st round pick, I don't think Garland, or Beau is going to going to get us a defenceman. And even then, the Canucks probably have to add, in which case then we're overpaying. Depends on the d-man. Some of us are still on team Peeke, he won't fetch a 1st But yeah, sounds like Calgary wants a premium for their UFAs, and given we're a divisional rival and we lost Soucy, again, they may try gouge the hell out of us. Not even sure who else might even be on the trade market. Any chance Seattle parts with Larsson to us? Particularly on the cheap. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barn Burner Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 4 minutes ago, Alflives said: Full credit … but? We destroyed the Haberdoodle Bugs. Dominated. Pounded. It's Alfin' John! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijjibo Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 2 minutes ago, Barn Burner said: It's okay to be pissed off and disappointed, but it's happened to the Canucks on too many occasions, as we all know, but it's still the rule. It works both ways. And, in this case, he was clearly a stride over the blue line offside. I didn't say it didn't. I'm saying I hate the offside reviews in general. It didn't change the outcome tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnstorm Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 1 minute ago, qwijjibo said: I'm saying having offside reviews for plays that are so marginally offside or for plays that happened WELL before the scoring play is ridiculous. Tell me you've never been passed off when a Canucks goal got disallowed because the play was JUST barely offside Honestly… no. My view is offside is offside. I don’t see any grey area or reason to say this one shouldn’t be called because it was close or 30 seconds ago. It’s one rule applicable to everyone as rules should be. If it’s a Canuck goal called back I’m disappointed, I’m not pissed off. Does your opinion include not counting goals that were scored but not immediately confirmed like the one in Ottawa the other night? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post AmyTheGma Posted November 13, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted November 13, 2023 I’m feel like we had a spy infiltrate the Habs equipment room and loosen a bunch of screws in the Habs skates. Maybe Burrows still secretly loves the team and was trying to give them an edge. 1 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barn Burner Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 1 minute ago, Ghostsof1915 said: And honestly it seems like 90% of the challenges for offside don't work. What is lame is when you know it's onside and you challenge it anyways. Not with these teams video crews. You know they have guys watching every offside or any other possible infraction and will notify the bench immediately. Obviously our video guys were right on the money. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 1 minute ago, JeremyCuddles said: Depends on the d-man. Some of us are still on team Peeke, he won't fetch a 1st But yeah, sounds like Calgary wants a premium for their UFAs, and given we're a divisional rival and we lost Soucy, again, they may try gouge the hell out of us. Not even sure who else might even be on the trade market. Any chance Seattle parts with Larsson to us? Particularly on the cheap. Now Larsson I understand. My fear is he's got a lot of wear and tear at age 31. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 2 minutes ago, AmyTheGma said: I’m feel like we had a spy infiltrate the Habs equipment room and loosen a bunch of screws in the Habs skates. Maybe Burrows still secretly loves the team and was trying to give them an edge. "I'm just making sure the skates are sharpened properly..." 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimito Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 31 minutes ago, Bure10Kuzmenko96 said: A goal is a goal no matter how it's scored I agree. Just saying why the game felt close 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucklehead Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 Nice win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 1 minute ago, Ghostsof1915 said: Now Larsson I understand. My fear is he's got a lot of wear and tear at age 31. Yeah, that's a lot of tough minutes on bad teams. But we don't need him for a long time. This year and next year at 4mil is good enough for me. Prospect/Pick and Beau for cap reasons for Larsson. Maybe, sorta, in my dreams. Lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyfan-observer Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 Great result by the Canucks - Also nice to see some depth scoring today - somewhat like how TO beat us yesterday - everyone chipping in.with their part. Not to take anything away with the 11-3 start which is impressive, but I would still like the team to focus a game at a time and hopefully reduce the noise a bit - articles / interviews about how the team is so successful to start, best player here, cup odds there, best goalie tandem here etc. Teams like Boston, Vegas NYR seem to continue to move along successful by controlling this exposure a bit so hopefully the Canucks can also do the same. It is a cliche but true - long season - don't get too up or down - respect your opponents - and if you can control the positive noise (or negative like last year) - that may help with the focus to hopefully correct any problems as they come about. Regardless, congrats on a good trip - they can get some rest before facing Bo + company on Wednesday. Go Canucks 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 4 minutes ago, qwijjibo said: I didn't say it didn't. I'm saying I hate the offside reviews in general. It didn't change the outcome tonight. I agree they suck, it’s like you can’t celebrate a goal until the faceoff at Center sometimes. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnstorm Posted November 13, 2023 Share Posted November 13, 2023 3 minutes ago, qwijjibo said: I didn't say it didn't. I'm saying I hate the offside reviews in general. It didn't change the outcome tonight. We don’t know how it effected the outcome. Every game is fluid and every action contributes to the outcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.