Jump to content

[GDT] Vancouver Canucks vs San Jose Minnows at Rogers Arena, Nov 20, 7PM PST


Rocket-68

Upcoming Deals  

67 members have voted

  1. 1. Will the Canucks Land a fLames Player?

    • Yes, Chris Tanev but only if the Canucks give up a 4th round pick or less - he's a rental after all.
      18
    • Yes, the other Giraffe on D (Russian one this time), but only if he agrees to a trade / sign deal that isn't longer than 4 years
      12
    • Never!!!!! Flames won't trade within Western Conference unless it is Tanev for Pettersson or something like that.
      28
    • #3 aside (Petey), yes, but only if it is more than the Canucks (or any other team) would be willing to pay ... DON'T DO IT Allvin!
      10
  2. 2. Where will the Canucks Big 4 Finish! Multiple Choice Allowed here.

    • Boeser will win the Rocket Richard ... pfffftttt pffffttttt, it is BC after all
      3
    • Boeser will hit the top 3 in goals scored but sadly not the RR trophy
      16
    • Petey will win the Hart Trophy and/or lead the league in points ... once he gets back to 100% health, watch the F out
      19
    • Huggy will grab the Norris but sadly will not match Bobby Orr and become only the second D-man to lead the league in scoring
      40
    • Miller will pull an Oven-Chicken and score 50+ goals while possibly leading the league in hits by a top 6 player
      17
    • Chaos Giraffe will win the Lady Bing, just not on the Canucks
      3
    • BWHAHAHAHAAAA ... none of the above, see my comments below
      15


Recommended Posts

Just now, greenbean30 said:

I feel like lately for the first minute of every powerplay, we are just super non-chalant and kill have the penalty for the other team.

Where's the sustained pressure that we used to get?

For sure, gotta move the puck way quicker as well as some bodies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, greenbean30 said:

Definitely was a play that went bad. After seeing the replay, I could've lived with a 5 but still think that's possibly a bit much. But the Intent to Injure Match? Absolutely not, don't think there was any intent or malice in Hogs actions, I just think they were both a bit off balance and the wrist happened.

I agree I think what I meant was. 5 mins was correct but intent to injure I don’t think so 

  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Canuckfanforlife82 said:

I wish they would go back to them full time. The change was never needed but these new altered ones looks so good. It all comes down to too much money to change things. Imagine the millions that would have to be put into Roger’s to update everything. (Paint, dressing rooms etc.) Aquillini’s likely don’t want to spend that sort of money.

Can't be millions, AND all us hardcores will buy more new jerseys, likely net money maker to change, that is the only reason teams do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, RWJC said:


Considering where he is in point standings I’d argue he wants to play with guys who see the game the same way creatively as he does and that’s what brings the best out of him. I’ve always wanted see a power forward alongside but I’m not sure he needs someone to create that space but he’s quite capable of doing that himself with his smarts and with the understanding and IQ of similar players like Kuz and the speed of Mik. If anything, he must have fast linemates who have the speed to keep up with how he sees the play unfold and can get to the marks where and when he needs them to.

I think Garland, Hoggz and Suter see the game at a very high level, but they have no finish whatsoever. Would like to at least try someone else with EP at 5 on 5. I really like Kuz but he isn't finishing, isn't playmaking and isn't digging along the boards. 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...